January 31, 2006
Austrians in Paris.
Signandsign, which translates many of Perlentaucher's daily summaries of the best articles in the feuilletons in the German-language papers, is worth at least scanning for the bits they've translated of pieces on a production in Paris of Mozart's Don Giovanni directed by none other than Michael Haneke. From Manuel Brug's review in Die Welt, for example: "Of course there's no graveyard, no hell. The stony guest is just a bloody corpse in a wheelchair. Elvira puts a knife in Giovanni, then the maniac cleaners with Mickey Mouse masks (straight out of Benny's Video) dump him out the window."
Perlentaucher points to another one, Peter Hagmann's in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, but sticking with English, signandsight translates all of Dominik Kamalzadeh's interview with Haneke for die taz - the topic here is strictly Caché.
Update, 2/3: Claus Spahn in Die Zeit (and in German); one photo.
Posted by dwhudson at 1:00 PM
Fests and events, 1/31.
Matt Dentler announces six more features to be screened at SXSW:
Perhaps you saw (or more likely, read about) Isabel Coixet's The Secret Life of Words when it screened at Sundance. If so, you'll be doubly interested to hear that it's just won four Goyas, the Spanish counterpart to the Oscars. Those four include best film and best director. Reuters reports and André Soares has the full list at the Alternative Film Guide.
In other awards news, the New York Times ran an AP report on the Screen Actors Guild awards, but the Carpetbagger's entries are far more fun. At any rate, Reese Witherspoon (comment: robbiefreeling at Reverse Shot) and Philip Seymour Hoffman were the big winners.
Also in the NYT: David M Halbfinger wraps Sundance, and he's found a theme: culture clashes.
Sonia Phalnikar has a serious take on this morning's Berlinale press gathering at Deutsche Welle (and in English).
Posted by dwhudson at 12:31 PM
Nam June Paik, 1932 - 2006.
Nam June Paik, an avant-garde composer, performer and artist widely considered the inventor of video art, died Sunday at his winter home in Miami Beach. He was 73 and also lived in Manhattan.
Roberta Smith, the New York Times.
Paul Schimmel, chief curator at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, said Paik was "the first artist to realize the potential of television, the idea that it was going to be all around us and change the culture." Despite Paik's fascination with that phenomenon, Schimmel said, "one of the beautiful things he did was to disrupt the sophistication of electronic technology."
Suzanne Muchnic, the Los Angeles Times.
The late Paik Nam-june, a Korean-born celebrated video-artist, will have his wish to be buried in his home country fulfilled. Paik, who died on Sunday at his home in Miami, Florida, will be cremated and his ashes placed in South Korea, the United States and Germany.
Bae Keun-min, the Korea Times.
Update, 2/5: Yoko Ono remembers Nam June Paik at a memorial service in New York on February 3. A short video by Doron Golan.
Posted by dwhudson at 9:36 AM
And the nominees are...
First, where's Jeff Daniels? Second, the Germans are happy.
And third, here's the full list of Oscar nominees.
Posted by dwhudson at 6:47 AM
| Comments (2)
January 30, 2006
Berlinale. Preview.
The annual end-of-January press conference previewing the full program of onscreen and offscreen Berlinale festivities, in full swing this year from February 9 through 19, was a bit jazzier this year. They went for a talk show format, moderated by an actual TV personality from ZDF, one of the festival's primary sponsors, and sat the programmers down in a line of swiveling orange lounge chairs.
Click to enlarge.
While the moderator joked about keeping the proceedings on schedule (that's him, glancing at his watch), the star of the show, hands down, this year as in every year, was Berlinale director Dieter Kosslick (to the moderator's left, our right). Kosslick's charm offensive can sometimes come off as precisely that, a means of warding off critique, but no, today, he was just plain damn funny, as when he related that one of the supreme benefits of his job are the private talks with the likes of George Clooney, whom he told, "You look good," and who replied, "So do you." In such special moments, Kosslick noted wryly, you know you're making a difference in the world.
But seriously, folks. Our press books span over a hundred-plus dense pages, far too much info to relate even just the highlights of here, but the gist is this: Once again, I wish I could live through those upcoming ten days at least three or four times, once for the Competition, once for the Forum, once for the Panorama and once again to catch a variety of events all over town, some of them associated with other sections or the Talent Campus. For example, Peter Kubelka will be delivering his lecture, "The Edible Metaphor," on Sunday afternoon (February 14); Wim Wenders, Tom Tykwer, Agnieszka Holland and Andres Veiel will be talking about Kieslowski the following Wednesday morning; Peter Cowie will be interviewing International Jury prez Charlotte Rampling on Thursday, and so on and so on.
A couple of final quick notes: The European Film Market is still exploding, now larger by a third over what it was last year; and all up and down that line of orange chairs, you heard the conviction echoed over and again that something very good is going on in the German film scene, something that not only most of the rest of the world but also even most German moveigoers haven't caught onto yet. And these programmers will be doing their darnedest to rectify that situation.
Posted by dwhudson at 6:37 AM
January 29, 2006
The New New World revisited.
You've seen a recent tendency here to round up reviews of films of particular interest into entries of their own, films that seem significant for one reason or another. Mostly, though, that significance doesn't inspire much more than a spate of approving or disapproving reviews and the occasional think piece - good reading, but something very different than what The New World is sparking at the moment: serious discussion throughout a wide-ranging network of blogs. Conversations that last a while, which can be unusual for blogs.
There are no ringleaders or moderators of such blog-to-blog or comment area discussions, but there can be particularly active nodes, and in this case, one is most certainly Matt Zoller Seitz. On Wednesday, he wrote fifth entry on the film at his still-new The House Next Door:
The New World is a new watermark. It is a $50 million epic poem made with Time Warner's money; it is a an American creation myth that recontextualizes our past, present and future as fable, as opera, as verse. It is this era's 2001: A Space Odyssey - a musical-philosophical-pictorial charting of history's slipstream and the individual's role within it.
It is nothing less than a generation-defining event.
And for the fifth time, he's kicked up some meaty commentary, drawing in fellow critics and a filmmaker or two.
In the meantime, his fellow New York Press critic, Armond White, doesn't share quite as much enthusiasm, but he is more or less on the same page: "It is [Terrence] Malick's rebuke to artful cynicism, re-imagining - and re-editing - history with grace."
The Telegraph's Tim Robey: "At the end, you emerge as if from a dream - a sublime and desperately sad one - and a large part of the sadness is that it's over." Some background.
Michael Atkinson in the Voice: "But the trims are targeted only at the restless: Malick's movie is essentially intact, and though run through with misjudgments (the voiceover ellipses from The Thin Red Line are still overused and mawkish) it remains a beatific, fabulously Rousseauian experience."
David Lowery: "The New World is triumph of cinematography and performance, of sound and picture, but it's in the cutting that Malick has truly achieved that lofty poetic function, and it is the cutting one must study to truly get to the heart of the film."
Peter Bradshaw in the Guardian: "Malick has a pure, fluent cinematic idiom; his expedition into the past is ambitious and glorious."
Paul Matwychuk in Vue Weekly: "I couldn't wait for Malick to conclude his opening montage and begin telling his story—probably the most legendary, mythic love story in American history. The crazy thing is, though, the montage never really ends."
Donna Bowman in the Nashville Scene: "Cinephiles will be left enraptured by the two new faces of Malick - humane and architectural on display."
In the Times of London, James Christopher reminds us that this "hypnotic piece of art... can be truly appreciated only on a big screen." And Kevin Maher meets Q'Orianka Kilcher.
But Joshua Gibson's having none of it, writing at Fagistan: "I know a lot of people like this movie, and really I can't begrudge that. It's about a kajillion times the film Brokeback Mountain is, and it's nice to see a movie like this being made at all, even it's not that good. But I'm beginning to think I saw an entirely different film than anyone else."
Posted by dwhudson at 4:52 PM
| Comments (3)
Bubble.
Manohla Dargis in the New York Times: "Easier to admire than love, Bubble is a fascinating exercise that seems calculated to repel most audiences, which probably suits [Steven] Soderbergh just fine." Also, Mark Olsen: "More than a few will be fascinated to see that Robert Pollard, former leader of the disbanded indie-rock stalwart Guided by Voices, has done his first film music for this quirky drama about the doings in an Ohio doll factory."
Steve Erickson for Gay City News: "Instead of making a film 'about' America's class and culture gaps, [Soderbergh's] willing to place his own difficulty understanding and bridging them at center stage."
Is that a good thing, wonders Michael Atkinson in the Voice: "Soderbergh's movie ambitiously focuses on movie-rare Americans... but never wonders what makes them tick."
Dennis Harvey disagrees in the San Francisco Bay Guardian: "Bubble isn't perfect. But it does underline how seldom movies really pay attention to the rhythms of truly average American lives. While that might sound like a prescription for pure boredom, Soderbergh's own striking cinematography is one major reason why these terse 73 minutes are anything but."
But from Andrew O'Hehir at Salon, it the film "no better than a C-plus for artistic achievement and a D-minus for audience appeal."
"[T]he director stares at his protagonists with such austere, Bressonian intensity it starts to feel impolite after a while," writes Carina Chicano in the Los Angeles Times. "It is, however, strangely absorbing — and its unadorned naturalism and metronomic editing style go a long way to create a feeling of floaty isolation and disconnect."
Desson Thomson in the Washington Post: "Soderbergh and screenwriter Coleman Hough aren't interested in creating a coy whodunit so much as evoking the deeper, less romantic mysteries of people - and it's riveting."
Writing in the Chicago Sun-Times, Roger Ebert agrees: "The characters are so closely observed and played with such exacting accuracy and conviction that Bubble becomes quietly, inexorably, hypnotic."
Ruthe Stein in the San Francisco Chronicle: "It's so low-scale, it makes his breakthrough Sundance hit sex, lies and videotape look like a Cecil B DeMille production."
Stephen Metcalf in Slate: "So brutal a negation of the popcorn aesthetic is liable to be mistaken for artistic courage."
Jürgen Fauth for World / Independent Film: "Bubble is astonishingly economical and effective melodrama - down to the devastating last line."
Cinematical's Karina Longworth: "Like Steven Soderbergh's best work, Bubble feels like a genre film that can't find its genre."
All in all, for Matt Zoller Seitz, writing in the New York Press, "it's more interesting to talk about than to sit through."
Dylan Hicks in the City Pages: "[T]he film's veneer of elliptical artfulness could be scraped off with felt."
Andy Klein in the LA CityBeat: "[I]t's odd to see Soderbergh, a tremendously funny guy, so totally suppressing his sense of humor (unless there's a level of deep irony here that I'm missing)."
"And yet the movie is interesting, almost in spite of itself," find the AV Club's Noel Murray.
And, as Monica Mehta reminds us at Alternet, "it might mean big changes in the way Hollywood does business over the next decade - much the way downloaded music has changed the way the music industry operates." Oh, let's not get carried away, cautions Anthony Kaufman in the Voice: "'Collapsing the Distribution Window' - one of The New York Times' 'Year in Ideas' highlights - is not going to live or die on Bubble's success or failure. A micro-budget feature with a nonprofessional cast going out in 25 cities, Bubble has little to do with the future of Hollywood."
The film's sparked a lively conversation at Twitch about the future of distribution; as for the film, there's Canfield's review: "Bubble isn't half baked - it's almost nonexistent. But here's the rub. I lived in a place just like the town in Soderbergh's film. And the non-actors in it are like carbon copies of people I grew up around and hung out with as a young adult."
More on all this from Scott Kirsner at CinemaTech: "While simultaneous release may seem like it endangers the revenues of studios and theater owners, the opposite may be true."
For Cinematical, Ryan Stewart talks to Mark Cuban about those collapsing windows.
Owen Gibson profiles Soderbergh for the Guardian. Soderbergh also talks about the film on Fresh Air.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:48 PM
Shorts, 1/29.
You'll want to have seen Jonathan Glazer's Birth before you read Robert C Cumbow's essay in 24 Lies a Second. But you definitely want to read that essay and Cumbow's take on the question, "Who or what was it?" So: Seen it? Read it. And if not, see the movie, then read that piece.
The other bit of reading you'll definitely want to get around to comes in the form of a compressed PDF file, courtesy of Tom Sutpen at If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger...: Calvin Tomkins's 1973 profile of Jonas Mekas for the New Yorker. While you're there, you'll also find an online listening tip.
"Without much fanfare, Michael Almereyda has developed into one of the most intriguing and intellectually rewarding filmmakers at work on the American independent scene." Mark Olsen interviews him for the LA Weekly, where Scott Foundas reviews Almereyda's "extraordinary documentary," William Eggleston in the Real World. More from Cheryl Eddy in the SFBG and Kenneth Turan in the Los Angeles Times.
Newsweek's annual Oscar Roundtable takes a fine turn this year, going exclusively with directors. Five of them: George Clooney, Paul Haggis, Ang Lee, Bennett Miller and Steven Spielberg. Nigel Parry's snapped a cute photo of the group clowning around to accompany the conversation moderated by Sean Smith and David Ansen.
Matt Zoller Seitz interviews Alonso Duralde, the arts and entertainment editor of The Advocate and author of 101 Must-See Movies for Gay Men who has some maybe-surprising things to say about Brokeback Mountain: "Regular folks are seeing it and being moved by it, and that's where its power lies. And while the film certainly doesn't wear an agenda on its sleeve, I'd go so far as to say that Brokeback Mountain has the potential to be the Uncle Tom's Cabin of gay marriage; Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel allowed readers to empathize with the horrors of slavery, and Brokeback will probably be, for many viewers, their first glimpse at the notion that there is a real, human cost to homophobia." Update: Part 2.
Mark Rahner in the Seattle Times: "Still can't wrap your head around the concept of gay cowboys? Got news for you, pardner: You've been watching them all your life."
Gunner Palace director Michael Tucker (at Movie City News, courtesy of International Documentary Magazine) on the absurdities of the MPAA's current ratings system: "Like many of the soldiers in the film, I walked into an Army recruitment station when I was sixteen and was wearing a uniform at seventeen. If young Americans can make decisions like that - and if they can actively be recruited by the military when they are 14 - then surely they are mature enough to see a film about their peers at war."
Mark Fisher in the new issue of ImageTexT: "[I]t is a specific mode of capitalism - post-Fordist finance capital - that is demonised in Batman Begins, not capitalism per se. Yet the film leaves open the possibilitity of agency which Capitalist Realism forecloses." Also: Fisher on "The Shining's Hauntology."
DK Holm at Movie Poop Shoot: "Film Geek is a delightful, sad, witty, scorchingly satirical film about movie buffs and their tendency toward asociality.... And I'm in a position to comment with some intimacy about the film's value for a simple reason: I'm in it."
In the Austin Chronicle, Marc Savlov talks to John Roecker, who's "finally unleashing Live Freaky! Die Freaky!, his jaw-droppingly outrageous feature debut, upon a public already up to its pinpoint pupils in black body-bag humor and anxiety."
Tim Lucas investigates "The Strange Case of Dr Jerry and Mr Gillis."
Girish: "So, if you feel like reminiscing: The first film (or scene from a film) that you can remember?" The cinetrix has a different yet not-so-different question: "When did cinematic poetry reveal itself to you in the past year?"
"Magnetically attractive to adolescent women and alternately threatening and validating to neurotic men, [Jeremy] Irons has become one of the most self-consciously, unnervingly erotic male performers in the business," writes Jonathan Kiefer in Maisonneuve. "If he has a niche then it's a strange and disquieting one: the go-to guy for the thinking person's kink."
Sarah Kernochan, who co-directed Marjoe with Howard Smith, in the American Prospect: "Flash forward 30 years. The evangelical sect has grown from this fringe cult to a huge, vibrant mass movement. It is in one's face 24/7. According to a Barna research poll in 2001, four out of ten Americans reported that they consider themselves 'born-agains.'" The DVD's out January 31.
"[A]nyone this cool is bound to be somewhat reluctant to analyze his own work, especially when he loves the gaps between words and the hobbled exchanges between people who speak different languages." And yet, writes Andrew Hultkrans in Artforum's "Diary," onstage for a Q&A in NYC a few days ago, "Jarmusch gamely faces this and more—impassive, Cuban-heeled, deadpan as John Lurie in Stranger Than Paradise."
"[F]or his many biographers, Peckinpah represents the last of the fierce Western individualists, a renegade who preferred to go out in a violent blaze of glory rather than submit to the leveling forces of modern industrial America. Certainly that was a story he told again and again in his films," writes Dave Kehr, reviewing the four new DVD releases from Warner. In the New York Observer, Charles Taylor cuts "small windows into each picture as a view into the director's preoccupations, and as a way of listening in on the echoes that occur from film to film." More from Steve Uhler in the Austin Chronicle.
Back to the New York Times:
Noting the differences between Alfred Clark's The Execution of Mary, Queen of Scots (1895) and George Melies's The Haunted Castle (1896), Marco Lanzagorta launches a three-part examination of the history of special effects in horror and sci-fi film.
Also in PopMatters, Simon Wood on why Hollywood chases trends, Bill Gibron on Spalding Gray's Life Interrupted and Amos Posner asks, "Is there such a thing as a female superstar?"
And then, Michael Ward, referencing Thomases Mann and Pynchon, on the strange attraction of Escape to Witch Mountain and Return from Witch Mountain: "The Witch Mountain storyline - involving a pair of supernatural, extraterrestrial siblings trying to reunite with their other-worldly community - entwines many powerful narratives, deftly synthesizing, for example, a potent wish-fulfillment fantasy with an almost beatific dream of ascending into the sky, of learning one is not of this Earth and, strangely, embracing this knowledge."
Filmbrain considers the "Orientalization of Myrna Loy" and wonders, "[H]as Hollywood changed much over the years?"
A season of Buster Keaton's films runs at the National Film Theatre in London from February 2 through March 29. In the Telegraph, Philip Horne analyzes a scene in Seven Chances and, in the Independent, David Thomson writes, "the experience is not only comic - it has to do with space, light, movement, duration, time. It is great theatre, but it is music and form, too. These are among the most beautiful films ever made in the silent era."
Cinematical's Kim Voynar talks with Alex Gibney about Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room.
Stop Smiling unveils its January DVD roundup.
The Chronicles of Narnia has turned out to be a huge hit with very long legs. Why aren't we hearing more about that - and its director, Andrew Adamson - wonders Patrick Goldstein in the Los Angeles Times. Related: Alison Lurie in the New York Review of Books: "It is no surprise that conservative Christians admire these books. They teach us to accept authority; to love and follow our leaders instinctively, as the children in the Narnia books love and follow Aslan. By implication, they suggest that we should and will admire and fear and obey whatever impressive-looking and powerful male authority figures we come in contact with."
Back to the LAT:
"The White Countess isn't like anything else in the Merchant Ivory canon I've seen; it's a significantly, substantially better work (though also seriously flawed) than the muck for which these filmmakers have often been highly praised," writes NP Thompson, crediting cinematographer Christopher Doyle with spurring director James Ivory "to take a greater number of risks."
At the IFC Blog, Alison Willmore's been engaging in a bit of "counter-programming," that is, reviewing films currently without distribution in the US that have nothing at all to do with Sundance. For example: Johnnie To's Election, Olivier Marchal's 36 Quai des Orfèvres and Park Kwang-hyun's Welcome to Dongmakgol.
In the Guardian, Ryan Gilbey wonders if Jennifer Aniston will really ever be a movie star (and asks around), as does John Patterson, who also wonders why anyone still goes to movies, while Jason Solomons wonders, "Whatever happened to the 90-minute movie?"
Also: Oliver Burkeman on Grizzly Man (more from Leslie Felperin in the Independent), Andrew Mueller calls for a sequel to Walk the Line, Laura Barton talks with Clive Owen about Derailed, Emma Brockes meets Gwyneth Paltrow and Ben Marshall interviews Eric Bana.
For the Observer, Gaby Wood pays a visit to Mia Farrow: "She's been filming The Omen 666 in Prague, she has appeared in a Luc Besson movie, Arthur and the Minimoys, and last year she gave an extremely well received performance on the New York stage in Fran's Bed. As she puts it, 'Things have been chugging along.'" Also: Graham Fuller asks a panel of 'xperts how the Oscar race will pan out. Related: Jason Solomons on award-magnet Focus Features.
Elaine Lipworth meets Reese Witherspoon. Also in the Independent: James Graham on the British rating system.
Felix Vasquez Jr in Film Threat: "While Oliver Stone and many other big wigs in Hollywood prepare their big budget, star studded spectacles tackling that horrible day, in comes September 12th, a heartfelt exploration in to a family's grieving of their daughter."
In the New Statesman, Rachel Dwyer recommends four Bollywood films "you must see."
Freshly forged, the site freshly launched: The Faith and Film Critics Circle.
Science loves you. Invisible Cinema: "The cinephiles already know that seeing movies increases empathy, but now we have the data (extrapolated ever so slightly) to prove it. Mirror Neurons!"
Annalee Newitz for Wired News: "Ostensibly a strategy game like The Sims in which you build up a movie studio, The Movies also contains the world's first dedicated machinima-building tool set." More from Lore Sjöberg.
Online browsing tip #1. The Lydecker Gallery, Dave Kehr's "Film Posters of Distinction."
Online browsing tip #2. Kinoart.net. Via Sean Spillane, who writes at Bitter Cinema: "I typed in Buñuel, Godard and Jess Franco, and was not disappointed by a long shot."
Online listening tips. At Slate: Mark Jordan Legan picks the best bad gorilla movies and Rita Dove reads "Two for the Montrose Drive-In" at Slate.
Another online listening tip. Milo Miles on Fresh Air, talking about the recent spate of punk-themed DVDs.
Online viewing tip #1. Alain Resnais and Chris Marker's Even Statues Die, via GreyLodge.
Online viewing tip #2. "Part of what I do, is teach storytelling, and recently I've become interested in master plots, or story templates, and how they've been changing in recent years." Hence Richard BF's Five Minute Matrix. Via Matt Clayfield.
More reviews:
Posted by dwhudson at 4:41 PM
Manderlay.
The IFC Center in New York is wrapping its Lars von Trier retro with Jesper Jargil's The Humiliated, a making-of doc shot on the set of The Idiots and, writing in the Voice, J Hoberman finds it "more powerful than the movie it documents—more successfully Dogmatic and dramatic (almost a 'reality' version of The Blair Witch Project)."
Then it's on to the film at hand: "Where von Trier's 1994 TV miniseries The Kingdom was a mad mix of hospital soap opera, Saturday-morning supernaturalism, and genteel detective story, spiked with gross-out effects and served with a sneer, its 1997 sequel was only more, and consequently less, of the same," writes J Hoberman in the Voice. "So too Manderlay, von Trier's disappointing Dogville sequel."
"[W]ho, beyond the gifted Danish filmmaker's ardent cult of admirers, will want to watch it?" asks Stephen Holden in the New York Times. "[M]ake no mistake: this deeply misanthropic, anti-American film insists the United States is ruled by crooks and gangsters and cursed by the legacy of slavery whose poison has seeped to its very core."
"You could say Manderlay deals with American problems," von Trier tells Jennifer Merin in the New York Press. "But that's just the film's surface. The problems aren't only American."
Salon's Andrew O'Hehir finds it "maddening, hilarious, frustrating and invigorating, pretty much from moment to moment." So he writes an "ass-kissy email" von Trier.
"Why can't the Danish director be both a brilliant filmmaker and a loathsome creep?" asks Dana Stevens in Slate. "The answer, of course, is that he can and he is."
Marcy Dermansky for World / Independent Film: "Von Trier has finally lost me."
Ed Gonzalez at Slant: "Von Trier's foresight is uncanny (his hypothetical thesis corresponds with an egregious and avoidable chapter in America's modern history) and his complex understanding of race relations in our country is unmistakable, which is somewhat surprising given how little he understands our gun violence (see - or, rather, don't see - Dear Wendy).
Andrew Sarris in the New York Observer: "It may be that the director has overreached in Manderlay by trying to deal with racial conflicts in an excessively abstract manner. Since his chosen mise-en-scène is already dangerously abstract, he has piled on too many layers of disbelief for an audience to overcome."
The AV Club's Scott Tobias finds the film "loses in power what it lacks in novelty, even though it's more relevant than anything the year is likely to bring."
Posted by dwhudson at 4:30 PM
| Comments (2)
From Korea, 1/29.
2006 is already being tallied at Koreanfilm.org. The first review is Adam Hartzell's, on If You Were Me 2, the second omnibus film to be commissioned by uth Korea's National Commission on Human Rights.
Meanwhile, picking up on an oh-so-2005 release, Kyu Hyun Kim: "My reaction to Rules of Dating is similar to one I had to Im Sang-soo's Good Lawyer's Wife. Both films are sexually frank, morally challenging, quite funny and moving at times and driven by great performances by male and female leads. They are also not nearly as well put together or coherent in design as their defenders make it out to be, and neither is as 'progressive' or 'honest' as its filmmakers (in this case screenwriter Go Yun-hui and director Han Jae-rim) probably think it is.
The most sweeping new entry, though, is Thomas Giammarco's "A Brief History of Animation, Part II: 1967 - 1972: The First Wave."
And in the Voice, Michael Atkinson reviews Hong Sang-soo's Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors: "Undramatic, dour, and photographed wholly in long medium shots that suggest Ozu by way of Stranger Than Paradise, Hong's scenario is reincarnated as its emotional antithesis - or as if the narrative had become rewritten by desire and memory."
Posted by dwhudson at 4:28 PM
Shandy.
"But matters of geopolitics aside," writes Stuart Klawans in the Nation, having just hesitantly approved of Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World, "the question remains: What can you see for fun on Friday night? The best answer I can give is the preposterously funny, perpetually inventive, implausibly successful Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story."
In Dennis Lim's making-of report for the Voice, Michael Winterbottom tells him, "Comedy's always able to be bolder structurally. If something's funny, people don't say it's deconstructive." J Hoberman compares the film to Irma Vep: "[Olivier] Assayas was making a serious comedy about film history; Winterbottom is demonstrating his own cleverness, although the editing shenanigans that intermittently parallel Sterne's narrative strategies are not that far from the 18th-century 'new wave' of Tony Richardson's manic Tom Jones."
AO Scott in the New York Times: "This is not just a movie-within-a-movie, but a movie-within-a-movie-within-a-movie, something that sounds unbearably arch but that is swift, funny and surprisingly unpretentious."
Stephanie Zacharek in Salon: "[I]t may be the most honest kind of adaptation imaginable."
The AV Club's Noel Murray: "[W]hile there's nothing new about the scenes of harried production assistants and indecisive directors, it's comforting to know that playing with expensive toys hasn't changed much over the years." More from Keith Ulrich at Slant.
"It's a riot," says Jürgen Fauth.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:25 PM
Fests and events, 1/29.
The Nashville Scene's Jim Ridley previews the Samurai Film Festival, running at the Belcourt Theatre through February 7: "The most exciting finds in the samurai series are by lesser-known directors who expand and complicate the genre Kurosawa defined."
Boyd van Hoeij has just arrived in Rotterdam, where the festival's running through February 5, and, at europeanfilms.net, reviews the first four movies he's caught.
The Film Comment Selects lineup looks scrumptious. February 15 through 28, but they're talking about it already at Cinemarati.
In the LA Weekly, David Thomson previews A Tribute to Gavin Lambert at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art through February 11.
AtomFilms has announced the winners of its Intel Indies Film Contest.
Flickhead points to the seeds of the next Blog-a-Thon: Michael Haneke's Code Unknown, Monday, February 13.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:22 PM
Spain in NYC.
As chance would have it, Víctor Erice's The Spirit of the Beehive began its run at the Film Forum on the same day that the series Another Spanish Cinema: Film in Catalunya, 1906 - 2006 opened at the Walter Reade.
Of the former, Michael Atkinson writes in the Voice that it "remains arguably the finest and most beautifully wrought first film of the European 70s, a mysterious crucible as elusive, concrete, and visually primal as anything by Herzog, Straub, Olmi, or Denis." More from AO Scott in the New York Times.
As for the series, a quick reminder of Manuel Yáñez Murillo's piece in Film Comment before turning to Jorge Morales in the Voice, who offers a capsule history and ultra-brief takes on half a dozen or so films.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:20 PM
Lists, 1/29.
Believe it or not, not only are there still best-of-05 lists popping up here and there, there are also a few very much worth dipping into. Jason Morehead, for example, lists and writes up his favorite music and movies, and then there are results of the AV Club readers' poll, complete with comments.
Scott Tobias notes that "A History Of Violence was far and away the winner, outpacing the also-rans just as decisively as it did in this year's Village Voice Critics Poll. Why? Watching it for a third time last week, I would speculate that it was the one film in 2006 that functioned perfectly as art and entertainment, a gripping, concise (not to mention action-packed) piece of storytelling that also hauls a lot of thematic baggage."
Vince Keenan picks up the America-in-ten-movies meme.
Fabien Lemercier has the list of César nominations at Cineuropa. The Beat That My Heart Skipped leads with ten.
Director's Guild of America has announced its awards. The big winners: Ang Lee and Werner Herzog.
There's a difference between a great film and a movie you want to watch over and over again. Sometimes, a big difference. Edward Copeland writes up a list of the second kind.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:16 PM
Biz, 1/29.
In the wake of Disney's $7.4 billion acquisition of Pixar, people seem to be talking a lot more about Steve Jobs than about Bob Iger. In Slate, Daniel Gross even goes so far as to write, "By acquiring a company with a charismatic, legendary, youngish CEO, Iger at the very least may have made his own job more difficult. At worst, he may have acquired himself out of a job. It's happened in the past."
We'll see how it pans out, but in Business Week, Peter Burrows and Ronald Grover have a less vulture-like take: "If [Jobs] can bring to Disney the same kind of industry-shaking, boundary-busting energy that has lifted Apple and Pixar sky-high, he could help the staid company become the leading laboratory for media convergence." Slashdotters discuss.
As for the other players, "'John Lasseter is probably the most respected single person in American animation,' said Kevin Koch, president of Animation Guild Local 839, the Hollywood animators' union. 'He's a creative leader without being overbearing or over-controlling.'" For the New York Times, Charles Solomon looks into the role to be played by the man who's done so much to make Pixar great, while Laura M Holson gathers the big numbers and big quotes. And the editors: "For Pixar and Apple, there is only an upside in this deal. The same is true for Disney, especially if it keeps shedding the ways of Mr Eisner's old company and allows itself to become what may turn out to be, in the end, Mr Jobs's company after all."
Similarly, in the Los Angeles Times, Richard Verrier and Dawn C Chmielewski do the Lasseter piece while Claudia Eller, Kim Christensen and Chmielewski offer the overview of implications of the deal as a whole. Eller follows up: Lasseter gets "greenlight" power.
Meanwhile, IndieWIRE's Eugene Hernandez reports on The Distribution Lab from Withoutabox "that will offer a suite of services to support filmmakers who plan to release their films themselves in various ways, including theatrical, DVD and on demand distribution. As part of the new program, participants will have access to ticketing, catalog management, accounting and online social networking and marketing solutions. A plan to offer DVD fulfillment and download distribution is also in the works."
Back to the NYT: Sharon Waxman on IFC's plans to release 24 films in theaters and on cable simultaneously and Caryn James: "Since the future is a big guess anyway, the Weinsteins might as well make it fresh."
You need to know about Trixie DVD. Sujewa Ekanayake explains it best.
The windfall deals you hear about stars and star directors scoring from studios don't really add up as impressively as they sound, explains Edward Jay Epstein in Slate and, disappointed that West Wing's been cancelled, Andy Bowers asks, "Why not continue the series on iTunes and cable/satellite pay-per-view?"
And while you're at Slate, snicker along with Bryan Curtis: "Art houses, the sanctuaries of cinephiles, have their own peculiar horrors. Despite their noble commitment to the movies, what happens there on a nightly basis is far more absurd than anything that happens in the multiplex."
Posted by dwhudson at 4:14 PM
Sundance. Awards.
There's been quite a bit of grumbling to be heard from Park City lately, so at least the final night offered a dash of drama: "Two new American independent films swept both jury and audience awards at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival this year, a first in the history of this twenty-two year-old festival recognized as the most important in the United States." All indieWIRE's Eugene Hernandez forgot to add is the exclamation mark. But he's got the full story and the full list, leading, of course, with those big winners:
Posted by dwhudson at 5:54 AM
Slamdance. Awards.
"Slamdance may have started out as Sundance's punk-ass little brother, but now, it seems, the little festival that could is getting a little more respectable, whether it likes that fact or not," wrote MaryAnn Johanson at Cinemarati a few days ago. "A carefully cultivated lack of propriety? Whether that's the attitude Slamdance is consciously projecting or merely a welcome side effect of being the thorn in the side of Sundance's oxymoronic conventional counterculture, it has fostered an environment where truly weird, truly angry, truly unusual, truly different filmmaking finds an audience." The evidence she then rolls out makes for a pretty convincing argument, too.
At any rate, to the awards. Over 20 in all; I'll mention a few, but the full list is here.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:07 AM
January 28, 2006
Park City Dispatch. 6.
The range in David D'Arcy's latest dispatch extends from the over-hyped to the under-hyped, from Little Miss Sunshine and The Darwin Awards to So Much So Fast and The Short Life of José Antonio Gutierrez. A quick note: a server move knocked us out for a while, but the "Park City Roundup of reviews from all over is once again being updated at least daily. Also updated: "Munich, 1/21."
If you've been paying attention to news of Sundance in the newspapers and the trades, you've probably heard of Little Miss Sunshine, the comedy directed by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris that's packed in the public. Before it was bought for distribution by Fox Searchlight for more than $10 million, and long before any commercial release, the small film already seemed to be anointed as the breakaway hit, this year's Sideways or this year's Sex, Lies and Videotape - the low-budget product that brings in high-budget profit and launches a thousand imitators.
My reaction is that, if that's the case, it doesn't take much. Little Miss Sunshine has some solid, charming performances, especially from the adorable young Abigail Breslin and Steve Carell, but it's still a cookbook family comedy about overstressed parents, an angry son, a gay uncle recovering from a failed suicide attempt, and a trash-mouthed grandfather, all on a bus to Redondo Beach where homely but sweet Olive, who's seven, will compete against dolled-up peers in a beauty contest. Nothing wrong with that, but nothing extraordinary either. To quote a line from Terry Zwigoff's Art School Confidential, "that's so September 10th."
This was the hot ticket for Sundance public screenings, but the press was just as eager to see it. Journalists crowded into the press screening at the Yarrow, in a sardine can of a hall. If there was an empty seat, I didn't see it. At other festivals like Berlin or Toronto, this is the kind of crowd that you expect for a major documentary on a serious issue or the premiere of a film by a respected director. Like the public, the press was charmed. Go figure.
Standing outside the Yarrow, I ran into the film editor of a prominent newspaper. In response to my question as to whether he liked the comedy, he said that he didn't, but that didn't matter. His jaw was dropping, having seen just what fluff brings out the crowds these days, crowds in the press that ought to know better.
The Darwin Awards, written and directed by Finn Taylor, was another one. The unverified word before the premiere was that tickets for this farce about stupid people killed in stupid ways were going for $700 on eBay. May be that's true. If so, the buyers are on my Darwin list. Even the aisles were clogged for this one. I guess you could waste your money on something stupider, like a Hummer or just about any restaurant in Park City, but this was still stupid.
For those who aren't au courant, the Darwin Awards are prizes given to people who die in the stupidest ways and are thought to be enriching the gene pool by not passing their genes on. The only reason that the makers of this film aren't in consideration for that same prize is that they're still alive.
Think of Jackass, except here you had a cast with David Arquette, Winona Ryder (who's great) and Joseph Fiennes, who Americanizes his voice into the role of a cocksure private detective who's not nearly as smart as he thinks he is. You've seen all these hare-brained gambits before in cartoons, except the cartoons were a lot funnier. Maybe this says something about casting, whether it's a stupid Hollywood effects-fest or just a stupid "independent" film. If you have the right people who are thought to appeal to the right audience, you can get anything made. There's nothing to be lost by aiming too low. To be fair, the enraptured audience that stuck around for the wisdom of the filmmaker and cast in the Q&A afterwards didn't seem to mind one bit. You can pity our species, because this has "hit" written all over it.
Some films at Sundance still define the un-hyped.
So Much So Fast, by Steven Ascher and Jeanne Jordan, witnesses the five years following the diagnosis that the once-healthy Steven Heywood has ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Lou Gehrig's Disease. It's bad enough that the disease seems sure to kill tall handsome Steven in a few years. That's a given, an inevitable outcome since there's no treatment for the degenerative neurological condition. It's even worse that too few people have the disease: research medicine and the pharmaceutical companies (who need big numbers to drive their bottom line) don't mobilize for a treatment, much less a cure.
Heywood's brothers and his family rally, and for a while, we have what looks like a battle being won by willpower, and by an ensemble cast of scientists who are convinced to join the fight by Jamie Heywood, Steven's brother. Jamie takes the lead and forms a foundation to study ALS. At first the money rolls in and supporters join up, taking us back to the idea of "so much so fast," the urgent race to accelerate the slow, deliberate pace of medical research, not just to find a cure, but to save someone whose life is slipping away on camera.
Wendy, Alex and Stephen Heywood
Why the family agreed to give this kind of access isn't addressed, yet Asher and Jordan are given what seems like total access to Steven Heywood, the near-perfect son in a near-perfect comfortable family outside Boston. Even perfect families have the grimmest of tragedies. Yet the story isn't grim. Besides the access that documentaries need, there's a warmth to their film that makes it more than an eye on a private turmoil, although just being that eye would have been enough. The warmth stays with you here, even when things fall apart. Steven deteriorates, Jamie's once-steadfast wife leaves him, and the foundation sustained by fevered optimism goes broke. Jamie asks the employees to work for minimum wage. In case you haven't guessed, nobody finds a cure.
Somehow optimism survives. Steven wants to live as long as he can (ALS is one of the diseases at the center of the debate over assisted suicide) largely because of his son, and the hope that he and his wife can have another child. Now that's hope. With no treatment available besides intubation and motorized wheelchairs that arrive after months, Steven's son somehow gives his father a life-sustaining energy - it's real, but even that has its limits.
You expect So Much So Fast to be the story of a triumph over adversity, a hymn to the redemptive power of technology and a case study in the courage of a man facing death. It's all of these, but what we want to believe in gets complicated. As Steven's muscles deteriorate, to the point where his lungs might no longer work, a tube goes in to ensure that he can still breathe. He's kept alive, but communication seems to stop. We never see on screen whether Steven is still alive now.
Another look at a life taken away from a young man is The Short Life of José Antonio Gutierrez, a documentary by the Swiss filmmaker Heidi Specogna. José Antonio Gutierrez was a Guatemalan immigrant and a marine who became the first American to die in the war in Iraq in March 2003. When his body came back, the motivational official story came out from the Bush administration that Gutierrez fought adversity to be an American, and that he died giving something to his country.
From this film we get the real story from those who knew Gutierrez. He was a street orphan from Guatemala City, a casualty of an earlier war between Indian rebels in that poor overcrowded country and an army assisted by the US in its campaign to crush them, whether or not civilians died, and hundreds of thousands did. We're taken from the streets of Guatemala City to the path northward to the US border (quite a few films this year have that border as theme and subject), and to Los Angeles, where José is homeless once again as he looks for work and finds shelter with foster families. Part of why he joins the Marines, a big part, is just to get a green card. We learn that thousands of immigrants are doing the same, putting their lives on the line, and sometimes giving their lives, so that they can remain legally in the US. All this is framed in an atmosphere in which illegal immigrants are almost as unpopular as Osama bin Laden.
Several people have told me that they think The Short Life of José Antonio Gutierrez is the best film of the festival. It's surely one of the best. Heidi Specogna has reconstructed an inconspicuous life, the kind of life that used to be called "minor," without a single interview with Gutierrez, few records, and the recollections of those who knew him. Her research found plenty of people in Guatemala who would talk. It's striking how many people remember the boy with no family. The cherubic street kid, small for his age, who could see an immediate opportunity in front of him, was also a cheerful, talented young man who wanted to become an architect some day, once he got the documents and the money he needed to enroll somewhere legally. An acquaintance in Los Angeles remembers that he wanted to give something back to the country that was not yet his. Gutierrez certainly learned how to say the right things. He was good at flattering, too.
This tale of the ultimate immigrant gamble - as if gambling with your life to cross the border wasn't enough - is not so new. In World War I, European immigrants from Italy, Ireland and Eastern Europe were told that if they joined the army, they would become citizens, although the threat of being hunted down and deported those days by the INS or anything like it was negligible. Many joined, and many died.
There is another part of this film that is a glimpse into the sociology of the armed forces, which are often the last chance for those who can't find a job and can't afford an education, and certainly can't get a passport. The military at its lowest level is filled with immigrants, mercenaries fighting America's wars in the hope of becoming American. By the term mercenary, I don't mean ruthless and cold killing for a buck. I'm just suggesting that these cash-poor young men and women are paying a price for citizenship. It can be three years of their lives at war. It can also be their lives.
Posted by dwhudson at 2:58 AM
Books.
"Corey could see the title on the cover. He didn't know much about philosophy but he sensed that the book was strictly for deep thinkers. It was Nietzsche, it was Thus Spake Zarathustra." That snippet from David Goodis's Night Squad comes from "Nietzsche and the Meaning of Noir: Movies and the 'Death of God'," an extract from Mark T Conard's The Philosophy of Film Noir running at Metaphilm. Update: Chris Fujiwara reviews Noir for the Boston Globe.
Reviews and a reply at Film-Philosophy:
Posted by dwhudson at 2:52 AM
Park City Dispatch. 5.
Jonathan Marlow, who's probably just landed in Rotterdam even now, sends one last word from Park City.
One waits with anticipation for the film that makes the whole expedition worthwhile. Failing that "knock it out of the park" moment, we take what we can get. On the Sundance side, This Film is Not Yet Rated by the ever-reliable Kirby Dick satisfies like few other documentaries in the festival (outside of the oft-mentioned Iraq in Fragments and the just-acquired Wordplay). A compelling topic entertainingly told, the film is certain to get audiences motivated to reform the current ratings system. Granted, the studios have no particular interest in changing the system. While I take issue with a few misstatements (Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle's raucous party occurred in San Francisco, not "Tinsletown") and a handful of missing details (I was left wanting a more complete history of the self-imposed self-censorship in Hollywood, starting with full rationale behind the Motion Picture Production Code/Hays Code; at least some mention of Blockbuster and their refusal to stock NC-17 and unrated films; perhaps an interview with the man himself, former MPAA head Jack Valenti), the doc is cunningly constructed for maximum enjoyment. Destined for a television appearance on IFC, it wouldn't be out-of-place on Court TV.
Meanwhile, on the Slamdance side, another documentary caught me entirely by surprise - Abduction: The Megumi Yokota Story. A little-known-in-these-parts story of thirteen (confirmed) Japanese citizens kidnapped by North Korea (although the actual kidnapped total may be much higher), the filmmakers have exceptional access to the parents of one of the victims as they attempt to pressure the Japanese government to get a definite answer from the Kim Jong Il administration about their daughter's fate. To put it succinctly, this is one of the most emotionally draining docs that I've seen in ages. If someone doesn't acquire this film immediately, I'll have to start a company and do it myself.
Where does that leave us? Still searching for themes? Music documentaries and music performance films are on the rise, selection-wise. In the wake of DiG! two years ago, clearly not all music docs are created equally. On the low end of the spectrum would be the execrable Leonard Cohen: I'm Your Man, which intersperses fair-to-middling versions of Cohen classics with contemporary interviews with the great poet/songwriter. Audiences would be better served by seeking out the legendary Ladies & Gentlemen, Mr Leonard Cohen (clips of which briefly appear in the former film). Documentary Competition entry American Hardcore does a disservice to its topic, stringing together poorly photographed segments into a largely incomplete history of the genre. The Beastie Boys performance film Awesome! (etc) features a string of hits cut together from dozens of low-end cameras distributed throughout the New York audience. Fans will not be disappointed. THINKFilm has some craft distribution plans ahead for the picture (which I'm not at liberty to mention). I have it on good authority that Jonathan Demme's latest Neil Young picture, Heart of Gold, is among the best that Park City has to offer. Sorry to have missed it. Sorrier still about Tis Autumn: The Search for Jackie Paris which, on paper, looks exactly like the sort of film that I would adore, but the lone industry screening conflicted with the Japanther show across town.
Finally, in my earlier plug for the adopted-hometown folks, I failed to mention a few other San Francisco titles that surfaced in Utah (and, if I forget any others, please comment below). Sam Green's fantastic short, lot 63, grave C, which screened locally at the YBCA a few months back, fills in the unknowns behind the man who was knifed at a 1969 Rolling Stones concert at Altamont (documented elsewhere in the Maysles Brothers' film Gimme Shelter). Finn Taylor's latest, The Darwin Awards, is likely hilarious (I wasn't able to catch it before departing for Rotterdam) but had the unfortunate distinction of premiering the same day that the death of one of its stars, Chris Penn, was announced. Meanwhile, it isn't only the screenings that connect the Bay Area to Park City. The panels, too, are populated by Californians. I'll mention only one - "The Culture of Moviegoing" - which featured, among others, CFI/MVFF Artistic/Executive Director Mark Fishkin and critic/UC Santa Cruz teacher B Ruby Rich. I've never had an extensive conversation with the latter, but I couldn't agree more with her statements at this discussion. While the so-called "death of cinema" is once again prematurely pronounced by pundits, we see an industry in its usual cycle of change and revision. Besides, I certainly couldn't complain that she mentioned GreenCine by name (and now I'm doing the same).
Off to the Netherlands. It won't be the same without my regular Park City band of misfits - filmmaker/journalist Shannon Gee, filmmaker/journalist Andy Spletzer - and our occasional hangers-on (in the good sense): composer Stephen Thomas Cavit, journalist/sommelier Jay Kuehner and film editor/screenwriter/journalist Hannah Eaves. Without the crew, I guess that will only leave me time for film-going. Plenty to see at that festival, of course, and the batting-average (to revive the opening cliché) should be much better.
Posted by dwhudson at 2:48 AM
Berlinale. Competition complete.
Lots of Berlinale news all of a sudden. First, with the addition of Sidney Lumet's Find Me Guilty and Jafar Panahi's Offside, the Competition is now complete.
The Panorama program, too, is now complete, with 37 features, 14 docs and 23 shorts from 33 countries. The Short Film Jury and Competition have been announced and there'll be a new award for the Best First Feature. The fest runs February 9 through 19.
And: "Films by Roberto Benigni, Neten Chokling, Luis Llosa, Fredi M Murer and Julien Temple highlight this year's Berlinale Special. Cinematographer Michael Ballhaus, film director Jürgen Böttcher (as a painter he is also known as Strawalde) and MoMa curator Laurence Kardish are among the winners of this year's Berlinale Cameras, which are awarded to personalities who have contributed to filmmaking in a special way."
Posted by dwhudson at 2:44 AM
FYC. 1.
Koreanfilm.org contributor Adam Hartzell has recently seen half a dozen films submitted to the Academy in the Foreign Language category. Here, his take on three: Say Good Morning to Dad, On the Other Side and What a Wonderful Place.
It's been widely reported, at least here at GreenCine, that the number of countries submitting films this year for consideration in the Oscars category of Best Foreign Language Film set a record: 91. Yet, in a sad twist, as Anthony Kaufmann noted in the New York Times, so far only seven of these films have US distributors - and chances are, few more will be acquired. This news saddens me, since I prefer my films subtitled. The difficulties the US is having in the world presently are due in part to its insularity and the shrinking profile of world cinema in this country only further weakens us where we are weakest. Yet, I am well aware that I live in a part of the US that will bring packed houses to a six-hour epic such as The Best of Youth at the Balboa Theater. So my sadness is more for the rest of my youth throughout the US outside of the film havens that bookend the country - San Francisco and New York.
My appreciation of world cinema is what brought me to rent a car last weekend to attend a sliver of the For Your Consideration series at the wonderful Christopher B Smith Rafael Film Center. For the third year running, the Rafael has brought a considerable selection of the foreign-language films submitted for the Academy's consideration (this year's series is programmed by Assistant Programmer Jennifer Schmidt). The series began with South Africa's entry, Tstotsi (Gavin Hood) and ends with Romania's entry, The Death of Mr. Lazarescu (Cristi Puiu). The trailer for the former is running in select theatres as I type and the latter will see its US release in April in New York, representing two of the afore-mentioned seven. In between those two, the Rafael has brought the submissions from Croatia, Chile, Fiji, Costa Rica, Hungary, Slovak Republic, Columbia, Finland, Spain, Thailand, Iceland, Indonesia, Mexico, Slovenia, Bolivia, Israel and Estonia. I caught films from the latter six.
Before I go any further, it's important to emphasize that the category calls for the "Foreign Language" films. This is the sad fact that Singapore and Eric Khoo learned this year when his film Be With Me was disqualified because Singaporeans have the audacity to make their official language English. Even though the English spoken there has its own pronunciations and Talking Cock flavor, it's too similar and has too much of what the Academy understands to be English to qualify. As much as I think this is an annoying technicality, and a shameful one considering it adversely affects Khoo and a film I've heard good things about, it does help the Academy whittle down the selection of nominees, a selection that is further whittled by the fact that each country is only permitted to submit one entry. Of the 91 submissions, 58 were "eligible," which is still a record.
Bolivia found herself disqualified by yet another technicality. Apparently two 35mm prints must arrive at the Academy by a certain date, and Bolivia's entry, Say Good Morning to Dad (Fernando Vargas), didn't make that date. The film traces a narrative backwards over three decades in the town near where Latin American revolutionary Che Guevara was killed, Vallegrande. Each set of characters in this film has their own use for Che's image. The local mayor wants to keep the town a tourist attraction, the military wants to hide what happened and the elder women want Che to remain a guardian to watch over them. The film stimulates discussion of what has happened to Che's image as it's been super icon-isized to sell throughout the world. But the film limits its impact by trying to achieve too much impact. What I mean by that is that the film has an overzealous score that attempts to amplify the emotions of the scenes to the point of overriding those scenes. Like Spielberg's need to have his characters spell out what was conveyed visually just moments before in Munich, Vargas has the music overdo what should blossom from the acting. I will submit that I write here ignorant of Latin American film history, and perhaps there is a tradition of musical theater-type scores, perhaps an influence of melodramatic telenovelas, but it results in the film failing to resonate with me, whatever the score.
Interestingly, the other Latin American entry I caught also made a reference to Che. The home of a Cuban family has Che's image mounted on the wall. Thankfully, unlike the World Baseball Classic, Cuba's films are allowed to enter the US. (And more reasons to be thankful: the US rescinded its stupid decision to keep Cuba out of the Classic this time around.) It wasn't Cuba's entry, Viva Cuba (Juan Carlos Cremata Malberti) that I saw, however. It was Mexico's On the Other Side (Gustavo Loza). This film follows three separate children, a boy from Mexico, a boy from Cuba and a girl from Morocco. What connects these children is the disconnect from their fathers. Each has a father who is forced to travel beyond borders in order to find work to provide for their families.
Another criterion is that the language of the film submitted must be primarily in the submitting country's official language. Austria discovered this when submitting the French-language Caché (Michael Haneke) as did Italy when its first submission, Private (Saverio Costanzo) was disqualified, a film that features Hebrew, Arabic and English since it takes place in the Middle East. Unlike Austria, Italy apparently had enough time, or saw enough importance to bother, to submit a second film that met eligibility requirements - Cristina Comencini's The Beast in the Heart. In Mexico's case, it's a good thing the Academy doesn't know much about the differences between Mexican, Cuban, and Castilian Spanish to disqualify their entry since barely a third of the film is spoken in the Mexican variant.
I initially thought On the Other Side was intended for younger audiences, but when the Mexican boy starts liberally peppering his dialogue with the F-word and a lecherous man gets too friendly with the Moroccan girl who has left her village to jump a ship to Spain to retrieve her father, I realized it won't be screening any time soon on Baby Brigade night at the Parkway in Oakland. Each of these children makes a private adult decision to go visit his or her father "On the Other Side" of vast waters. Particularly poignant is the Cuban story with its a breathtaking image of the Cuban boy and his childhood friend racing to the ocean to paddle to the US. Loza chose a shot of a huge sky with the children appearing as an insignificant, yet significant, zero and minus sign rushing towards the pier from the lower left-hand side of the screen. I wish Loza had held this image longer, but even with its brief appearance, it is the image that most stayed with me out of all the films I crammed into my weekend.
From children left behind to men and women doing the leaving in the Israeli film What a Wonderful Place (Eyal Halfon). This film presents glimpses into the lives of the adult migrant workers who have had to leave their families and homelands to survive financially. While considerable time is spent on the story of a Ukrainian woman snuck into Israel as human cargo for prostitution and a Filipino and Filipina nurse who are having difficulty getting pregnant, other migrant workers from other countries such as Thailand are given camera time as well. On the Israeli side, we have a farm owner who brought the Thais over legally, a rancher who becomes frustrated with the Thais constant planting of illegal traps, and an ex-cop whose gambling debt has tied him a noose connected to the hands of the men he used to bust as he works as a money runner and overseer of the prostitutes for a subset of the Israeli mafia. The film criss-crosses between stories throughout, establishing some nice cross empathies. The rancher's disabled father is taken care of by the Filipino nurse who himself has a gambling problem. The rancher, although frustrated with the Thais, is presented as quite understanding of his nurse's plight. The ex-cop protects one Ukrainian prostitute in particular but not in as paternalistic a way as such a relationship is often portrayed. Sans sexual transaction, she saves him from drowning in his sorrow as much as he saves her.
Of the films I saw, What a Wonderful Place seems have the qualities that will appeal most to the middle-brow tastes of the Academy. (It won four Israeli Academy Awards.) Following the intertwining plots that are so popular these days, where different walks of life Crash into each other with a script-assigned randomness, the film also brings up issues currently topical in the US. I wouldn't be surprised if this film were selected as a nominee. Personally, however, I was more affected by the Indonesian and Slovenian entries, which I'll get to in my next report from the series.
Posted by dwhudson at 2:26 AM
| Comments (4)
January 25, 2006
Filmmaker. Winter 06.
With its new Winter issue, Filmmaker also relaunches its site - slicker, cleaner, easier to read, and now with the blog entries appearing right there up front, just a lot more happening, too.
Of immediate interest in the new issue, even for those not following goings on in Park City all that closely, is "Defining Moments," a feature in which over two dozen filmmakers with works screening at Sundance address "the pivotal event from the making of their movies."
If you're a regular reader of the Daily, it's probably because you share a general set of interests, and you'll find many of those interests strewn throughout this issue. Scott Macaulay talks with Richard Linklater about A Scanner Darkly, for example, a film we've been anticipating feverishly around here. (Design note: Now the "How They Did It" sidebar really is a sidebar; nifty.)
Andrew Bujalski - yes, Andrew Bujalski - interviews Caveh Zahedi. The subject at hand, of course, is I Am a Sex Addict, which, as Eugene Hernandez reported recently in indieWIRE, has been picked up by IFC Films. But the two filmmakers talk about Caveh's work as a whole as well, and then there's the sidebar: Caveh's "Self-Distribution: A Manifesto."
Matthew Ross: "Twenty-five years and countless bad movies later, another film has finally captured the magic of Wild Style and updated it for the new millennium." The film is Block Party, and Matthew talks to its director, Michel Gondry.
Matthew Ross also has questions for Eugene Jarecki about Why We Fight. The opener: "I'm pretty obsessive about politics, but your movie still scared the shit out of me." To which Jarecki replies, "In that way I guess it's a bit of a horror film or a tragedy, I suppose." (Euro readers: The film's on Arte this coming Tuesday evening.)
Once again, Matthew Ross: "Bubble does not come off as an experiment or stunt." And yes, he talks with Steven Soderbergh.
Anthony Kaufman explains why Strangers With Candy and Factotum got dropped by their US distributors. The second story has a happy ending. As Anne Thompson reports in the Hollywood Reporter, it's been picked up by - again - IFC Films.
Mary Glucksman returns with that terrific regular feature, checking in on five indies currently in production.
"Reports":
Posted by dwhudson at 11:23 AM
| Comments (1)
Park City Dispatch. 4.
In his latest dispatch, David D'Arcy reviews a trio of docs worth catching if you can: Songbirds, TV Junkie and God Grew Tired of Us. A quick reminder: the "Park City Roundup" of reviews from all over is being updated at least daily.
Year after year, once I've had my run of dramatic competition films at Sundance, I find myself returning to the documentaries. I find that I'm more likely to discover something here, less likely to watch a formula roll out over the screen.
In the past week, one film that's barely made itself known in the mix is Songbirds, Brian Hill's documentary that's been described as a prison musical, an accurate enough characterization that still falls short. Think of everything from Jailhouse Rock videos to the documentary Shakespeare Behind Bars to The Farm. If you haven't been inside, films will flood you with images about prison, a bit like the way gangster movies shape your notion of crime much more than crime does - that is, if crime hasn't happened to you.
This doc of testimony in song from women who are inside Downview prison in Britain first seemed to be a quirky way of approaching the pain of being locked up in country that, according to the Sundance catalog, locks up more of its citizens than any other nation in Western Europe - they're still way behind the US (and that's not even counting the CIA prisons in Europe).
Songbirds is built around songs performed by prisoners. Each song tells the stories of the crime and the broader autobiography that got the singer convicted and imprisoned. Each musical style - like the punishment, as they say - fits the crime, and the crimes do vary. Each is choreographed like a music video. It would be hard enough to make this kind of documentary gambit plausible at all, much less compelling. Yet instead of parody or wish-fulfillment or the "look inside," here you get emotional truth that you wouldn't expect.
There are half a dozen songs here, all original - that's the key word. Hill starts with Mary, "Scary Mary," a punch-scarred career thief whose melodic rap-inspired declamation mocks the remorse required of the convicted criminal with the chorus "I'm Very Sorry"... for slicing your head open and throwing piss at you through the bars.
With other songs about carrying drugs (the upbeat ensemble ska number, "Mule It") or Irish ballads, the refrains are sung over and over again, reminding you of the kinds of events and relationships that end up putting women in jail - abusive parents, rape in childhood, stupid mistakes in adolescence that set your life irrevocably downhill, drugs and laws broken for love. Most of the women here at one time or another did something for a man that got them arrested. Some are in for 18 years, for bringing drugs into Britain. Seeing the film, and listening to the songs - all in the voices of the women prisoners - it's hard to believe that prison accomplishes much for these prisoners, besides giving some of them an opportunity to tell their stories.
None was a professional singer before the project was filmed, with lyrics by Simon Armitage and music by Simon Boswell, but the performances, bookend-ed with interviews that tell heartbreaking stories, are the real thing, real as music, real as testimony. A documentary needs to get an audience to sit down and look, which so often means sitting down and looking at something you thought you knew before.
Songbirds achieves that intensification of experience as it moves from character to character singing stories that you've skimmed condescendingly every day in the newspaper, if you've noticed them at all. The stories ring with emotion, so you're focused on what it took to put these women in prison, not on the extensive interviews, trust and musical imagination to turn that testimony into a film.
Don't assume that this is Every-prison. The women don't seem to be treated abusively - who really knows? - and it must have taken major cooperation from the warden and staff to allow the rehearsals and shooting. This approach probably won't work in too many other situations, even if there is a story in every prisoner. But it worked here.
Based on my sampling of people at the festival, only one or two others saw Songbirds. Yet I'm told there's talk of an American remake. Is it a recipe for failure? Keep your fingers crossed.
Another unlikely doc, for its logistics and its story, is TV Junkie. The title alone got me there. It made me think of the ultimate pulp update, when it's really a motivational story, the perennial extreme tale that, in its way, becomes a universal reality check.
Am I wrong, but wasn't it on Fox News that I heard a news analyst (or many of them) say that the most effective way to deal with junkies would be to sentence them to hard labor for endless terms and throw away the key, with no college courses, no television, no basketball? Or did I just hear an "expert" there list drug addicts with all those other delinquents who should get the death penalty? What happens if it's a drug addict whom you know? What if it's someone who works for Fox? Would you be more fair and balanced?
TV Junkie comes out of one man's obsession with videotaping his life that really makes you rethink all those "world-of-images" clichés. Rick Kirkham is the bright-eyed video nut from Oklahoma who tapes everything in his life - from family, to parties, to sex, to all his adventures. He finds the perfect job, TV reporter, and rises to the position of a correspondent for Inside Edition, where he makes a specialty of doing his own stunts like motorcycle jumping and setting himself on fire. He also has a "substance abuse" problem, which seems normal enough for a single guy who makes money and goes to a lot of parties.
He marries a girl from a small town in Texas after he gets her pregnant, sets her and his young son up in a Dallas suburb, and goes back to New York where he works for Fox and smokes crack.
Everything is taped - everything. We see the crack and booze taking Kirkham away from his job and eventually getting him fired. He and his wife fight, they have another child, they reconcile, he smokes more crack, things get worse until she leaves him for good (after a few years with the patience of Job for Kirkham's boyish taping and his addiction) and he finally gets sober. The film ends with a motivational speech to a high school of addicted teens. Sound familiar? Now you've seen it.
TV Junkie is less than two hours, down from 3000 hours of tape, distilled by Michael Cain, Matt Radecki and their team of "screeners" of Kirkham's video autobiography. The toll on Kirkham's family is painful as his kids watch their parents fight, yet Kirkham has a buoyant charm that comes back after the binges. There is real love here, in spite of everything.
We see it all, or do we? After the film's first screening, when the filmmakers reluctantly acknowledged that Kirkham was in the house, he made a motivational appeal to his audience to seek help for addiction. Fair enough. That's his life and his living now.
Kirkham told me after the screening that he also filmed himself scoring drugs on the street in NYC and elsewhere. Now that would be revealing, because it's not just the auto-Oprah generic family coming apart, the novelty of the dog that can stand on its legs and operate a video camera. We don't see it in TV Junkie, which Kirkham said was six hours long before it was cut to this length, 107 minutes.
What happened? Sometimes feature length doesn't serve a story like this. Capturing the Friedmans would probably also have been better served as a story in a much longer format. I guess that's what DVDs are for.
One of the strengths of Sundance is that there is likely to be another documentary to counterbalance the self-obsessive meltdown of TV Junkie. (Be that as it may, you should see this film. I'm sure that the filmmakers would disagree with that characterization of their story as narcissistic, and insist that they had to persuade Kirkham to allow them to put all his pain on the screen.)
For that counterbalancing fix, see God Grew Tired of Us, the chronicle of a small group from the 27,000 "lost boy" refugees from Sudan who are now settled in the US, in places like Pittsburgh and Syracuse. These boys, now men, are children who watched their parents get killed in their villages, sometimes hacked to death. They then walked 1000 miles to refugee camps in Kenya, where they spent ten years crowded together. Many died of disease there. Just listing their hardships trivializes them. The world's indifference trivializes them even more. The boys then were sent to various American cities, which first seemed like paradise because there were jobs, food and shelter. Soon they become lonely, and worry about losing their families and their culture. Their fears are well-founded.
The Sudanese young men have been through hell, and they are the lucky ones. Who knows how many of their relatives have been killed, how many women raped, how many driven off their land? The numbers are in the millions. Slender and elegant, beatific in their optimism, these are the survivors who were depicted as near-corpses in news coverage. Most of them still radiate with hope, although we see a group that has bought into the US consumer image of designer rap, with flashy cars and jewelry.
Christopher Quinn's film is funny as boys who never knew electricity move into apartments with televisions and telephones, eating airplane food on the way. The food was better in the refugee camp, one says.
You get uneasy watching these friendly adaptable young men; merchants fear them when they enter a store as a group, seeing only their skin, if not another species. Every phone call from abroad brings news of more deaths. Most of their money, and it's not much, goes back to family in Africa.
God Grew Tired of Us is not grand cinema. It makes no such claim. It gives us more time with its subject than we probably will get from any media coverage of the Sudan, unless the genocide there that is barely covered turns into an even grander extermination campaign. Funny that this was not the country we invaded, "liberated." Even if these documentaries take more than a year to make, they're filling gaps in journalism. More about that in a later installment.
Posted by dwhudson at 7:50 AM
Chris Penn, 1965 - 2006.
Actor Chris Penn, the younger brother of Sean Penn, has been found dead at his home in Santa Monica, California.
The BBC.
I'll always remember him from Reservoir Dogs, of course, but also in Short Cuts (as Jennifer Jason Leigh's husband) and the underrated The Music of Chance, not to mention At Close Range and in his much younger days, All the Right Moves and Footloose - in which he was quite sympathetic and realistic as a rural teen in need of a reawakening. Unlike his brother, he was destined to be a character actor, with his doughy build, but was a pretty darned good one.
Craig Phillips.
Posted by dwhudson at 2:12 AM
| Comments (8)
January 24, 2006
The Film Journal. 13.
The Film Journal may be going on hiatus - "hopefully no more than a year," writes editor Rick Curnutte, but there's a fine issue to hold us over before the Journal returns from its new base in Chicago. The centerpiece of Issue 13 is a six-article retrospective devoted to Richard Fleischer, opening with...
Victoria Oxberry looks into the influences of early 30s American horror films and, by extension, the German Expressionist classics of the 20s on Disney's Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
Brian Wilson admires Majid Majidi's Baran, an accomplishment more complex that it may seem at first glance. Also: "Brief Notes on Land of the Dead."
Werner Herzog is currently being celebrated right and left, but David Church has problems with Even Dwarfs Started Small: "[I]t cannot avoid negative stereotypes of disability which taint its more positive objectives."
Amar Bakshi on François Truffaut's The Wild Child, Carol Reed's The Third Man, Orson Welles's Citizen Kane and Fritz Lang's Fury: "[I]t seemed to most of these filmmakers, that the very means of overcoming subjugation to institutions of power is embedded in a new mechanism of power - the film."
"No film, however superficial it might appear, is ever ideologically innocent," writes Leon Saunders Calvert in "Ideology and the Modern Historical Epic: How the political concerns in the genre have changed since 11th September 2001."
2005 was, like 1993, one of those years for Steven Spielberg. James Rose considers a scene in the movie that gave him the clout to pull off such feats - Jaws.
"What does it mean when a practitioner, even a master, of one art form (in this case, film) goes out to praise an entirely different art form? I suggest that it can - and in this case, does - signal the creation of a brand new language." Justin Vicari on that voracious reader, Rainer Werner Fassbinder.
Andrew Repasky McElhinney claims Murder-Set-Pieces is "the exploitation film of the 9/11 decade" and talks with director Nick Palumbo.
Reviews:
Posted by dwhudson at 2:54 PM
January 23, 2006
Park City Dispatch. 3.
Jonathan Marlow, already bracing himself for Rotterdam (opening on Wednesday), takes stock of this year's Park City experience as a whole.
When folks go to the effort to appear in the mountains for a festival (or two), they want the films that they see to be remarkable. Compromises will be made in the hope of finding something, anything, to like. The programmers haven't made it easy this time around, unfortunately.
Regardless, from the sublime (such as Bill Basquin's beautifully photographed short Range) to the superficial (Terry Zwigoff's Art School Confidential, which incidentally inverts everything good about Ghost World), the Bay Area is relatively well-represented at Sundance. Off the screen, the influence of San Francisco is better acknowledged at the SF360 announcement Monday night, reflecting a partnership between indieWIRE and the San Francisco Film Society (among other like-minded organizations). However, you'll have to travel south along the coast to find the city of choice - Los Angeles, reflected in the opening night picture, Friends with Money. If your idea of entertainment is a few hours with self-absorbed, unlikeable people, this film should suit you. With Park City largely transplanted with Southern Californian sorts for ten days, it figures that the area would be represented largely in (and out) of the makeshift cinemas that temporarily litter this mountain town.
For all of the fuss made about Sundance's "return to independent filmmaking," you still have to venture to the top of Main Street (specifically Treasure Mountain Inn, the site once again for Slamdance) to see such work in action. For instance, Todd Rohal's wonderful debut feature, The Guatemalan Handshake, is more inventive in its first ten minutes than the entire duration of many films (the abysmal Lucky Number Slevin, for instance) at the elder festival. The Call of Cthulhu similarly represents a milestone in no-budget production, obsessively recreating HP Lovecraft's tale in period detail.
Is it by coincidence, then, that the best work at Sundance arrives from outside our borders? Whether it be Mexico (Carlos Reygadas's stunning sophomore effort Battle in Heaven), Denmark (Allegro, from Reconstruction helmer Christoffer Boe) or Iraq (the latest from Gaza Strip director James Longely, Iraq in Fragments). A coincidence, as well, that all three are represented by the same publicist, Susan Norget?
Not unlike CES, new modes of distribution are a repeated topic of discussion at panels, parties and, in passing, along the street. Whether it be Ironweed's subscription service or IFC's latest offshoot, the tailspin of theatrical revenues (among other issues) has everyone talking about potentially lucrative ways to reach audiences. Not that I can blame them; GreenCine's intentions are identical.
Splitting time between screenings and parties is a necessity in these parts, since the real work is done at both. Whether it's playing chess with NWFF's Michael Seiwerath at the THINKFilm party (with Mix Master Mike spinning "virtual" records in the background), briefly chatting with John Waters at the here!/Outfest Queer Brunch (visiting to promote his new television show) or dining at our home-away-from-home with the Zellner Brothers (who once again have a characteristically confounding short screening at the festival), the real reason for returning to Park City is the assortment of exceptional people that descend on the town for a handful of days. It's an attraction that has brought me to Utah for the past half-dozen years. We'll see if that is enough to get me back again next time.
Posted by dwhudson at 3:24 PM
| Comments (1)
Offscreen. Catching up.
As Brian Darr remembers to recount how Peter Kubelka changed the way he watches films back in October and, in a comment, Girish reminds me of Jennifer MacMillan's talk with filmmaker Paul Shepard about his Arnulf Rainer tattoo, I recover, too, another mental note that somehow slipped: Volume 9, Issue 11 of Offscreen is devoted to Austrian avant-garde cinema.
Posted by dwhudson at 8:56 AM
| Comments (2)
Park City. Roundup.
You don't have to be in Park City to spend nearly as much time keeping up with all the goings on at Sundance, Slamdance and the rest as anyone actually there. If you're so inclined, you'll be following indieWIRE's firehose of buzz, watching the Cinematical crew's "Roundtable Video" and lots more video at Movie City News, where David Poland writes: "A very smart young lady said today, when I mentioned my disappointment with Friends with Money, 'By the end of the festival, you'll be begging to see something as good as Friends with Money. And she may be right."
January 22, 2006
Shorts, 1/22.
The Telegraph's Andrew Murray-Watson: "The board of Pixar Animation Studios, the digital animations company, is set to meet tomorrow to approve the company's $7bn (£3.9bn) takeover by Disney." Via Cory Doctorow at Boing Boing, where he's also pointing to Penn Jillette's radio show.
Steve Rosenbaum is justifiably upset that John Kerry refuses to see his film: "I made Inside The Bubble for you. It's not a whitewashed public relations approved view of the 2004 Election. But it's honest. And it is truthful. And while it's not the last word on why the Democrats lost - I'd suggest that for people trying to figure that out, it's required viewing."
For the Northwest Asian Weekly, NP Thompson previews Weathering the Storm: The Enduring Cinema of Mikio Naruse, at the Northwest Film Forum in Seattle through February 26:
The critic Susan Sontag phrased it like this: Naruse "creates an ardently materialist world where the social pressure for money acts like a vise to the head." And indeed, in works such as Late Chrysanthemums (1954) and When a Woman Ascends the Stairs (1960), both of which claustrophobically portray the (mis)fortunes of aging prostitutes and unhappily retired geisha, the endless emphasis on economics is almost overwhelming. Naruse's women, at least in these two films, seldom speak of anything except money, and the director is well attuned to the intricacies of social Darwinism, so much so that the movies have a disturbingly contemporary feel to them, despite the milieu of a defeated, post-World War II Japan in which they take place.
Charles McGrath observes that Michael Winterbottom "thrives on filming the unfilmable, and to make Tristram Shandy he simply dusted off that handiest of postmodern devices: his film is about a film crew making a film of Tristram Shandy.... For once, though, this ancient wheeze actually comes off - in part because this kind of self-reflexiveness really is in the Sterne spirit, and in part because nobody takes the meta-movie idea too seriously. This film is more in the spirit of Abbott and Costello in Hollywood, say, than 8½ or Day for Night."
Also in the New York Times:
Acquarello on Bell Diamond: "Few filmmakers capture the complex landscape of rural America in all its strong-willed self-determination, insularity, and dispiriting sameness as pointedly and eloquently as Jon Jost."
Writing for the World Socialist Web Site, you can imagine the field day Joanne Laurier has with Fun With Dick and Jane.
Second-life news at Twitch: Jean-Pierre Jeunet and Mark Caro's Delicatessen is headed to DVD; Futurama will indeed return.
Rotterdam previews from The Gomorrahizer at Twitch: Hiromasa Hirosue's The Lost Hum, Simon Rumley's The Living and the Dead, Noriko Shibutani's Bambi♥Bone, Kazuyoshi Kumakiri's Green Mind, Metal Bats and Ryûichi Hiroki's It's Only Talk.
Nick Davis picks his 2005 top ten.
Is Sarah Silverman truly "anti-Asian"? Sujewa Ekanayake looks into it.
Daniel Robert Epstein SuicideGirls interview roundup: Steven Soderbergh (related: Chuck Tryon comments on Mark Cuban's defense of Bubble's unconventional release), Jeremy Kasten and Bryce Dallas Howard.
William Shatner will be hosting the Golden Groundhog Awards on February 2. Thanks, James!
André Soares remembers Anthony Franciosa, 1928 - 2006.
Posted by dwhudson at 1:51 PM
January 21, 2006
Park City Dispatch. 2.
On Thursday, David D'Arcy sorted through some of the general themes running through this year's edition of the Sundance Film Festival and took closer looks at The Trials of Darryl Hunt and Thank You for Smoking. Today, he considers festival opener Friends with Money, the "porn-athon" Destricted and Alan Berliner's Wide Awake.
I've been thinking about the opening night film, Friends with Money. You have a lot of time to think when your shuttle bus is in limo-lock behind a Hummer-load of tech execs of the year or studio bureaucrats.
The ensemble cast of Friends with Money, malcontents in over-comforted Los Angeles - with Jennifer Aniston as the odd friend out, who quit a teaching job and now lives hand-to-mouth as a maid - made me think of another film set in LA thirty years ago. This film was Welcome to LA, by Alan Rudolph, and the characters were loners whose paths crossed either in business or by chance. By chance once again, Rudolph, who started out as an assistant to Robert Altman, is on the Sundance jury this year. Back in 1976, Rudolph's story of isolated characters driving to and from empty encounters in sun-baked LA showed disconnected people connecting through sex. Sissy Spacek plays a maid who, innocent enough, also gets her share. Rudolph's characters are charged particles, or as charged as particles can be when you factor in pot, Quaaludes, alcohol and Los Angeles itself. It was aimlessness in a town of intense but hollow ambition.
If you watch Welcome to LA, I'd bet that it would seem nostalgic now. This was an era before AIDS, the earthquake, the riots. It was when Schwarzenegger was a muscleman who did occasional nude shots. It was an era when you worried about what you didn't get from casual sex, not what you did get.
The setting of Friends with Money is that LA world of charity events, private schools with lots of kids named Max, farmers markets, Spanish-speaking domestic help, house renovations and hybrid cars. Unlike the characters in Welcome to LA, these characters are nothing if not connected - dependent might be a better word, co-dependent might be even better. They're comfortable, in the economic sense, not the psychological sense, and they're intensely competitive as they watch each other age more slowly or have more sex with a spouse more often.
The settings are houses, cars and restaurants - what could be more LA?
It's truly a Cinderella story, although I'm much more interested in the cinders than in the salvation of Jennifer Aniston that does indeed make Friends with Money a fairy tale. Frances McDormand's character sets the grim tone; she's a clothing designer who can't make herself look good, and she shares her anger with anyone around. It's too late for her to buy beauty or happiness with money, but there's nothing else there to buy it with.
The ensemble is the sit-com staple. We're talking about a film whose star made her reputation on the idiotic TV show, Friends. Yet Aniston's character here is complex, proud but self-mocking, lonely to the point of dragging around three-timing personal trainer Scott Caan (we used to call these guys "heels") and acceding to his demand for his "take" of the pittance that she's paid after he wipes off a shelf or two. She even wears the skimpy French maid's costume that the generous guy buys as a Christmas present for her. She has the you-take-what-you-can-get attitude of someone who knows better.
(There's second ensemble here, too, the Spanish-speaking gardeners, housekeepers, nannies and construction workers who watch this emotional pageant like a mute Greek chorus on minimum wage, incredulous as Mr and Mrs suffer through the day.)
Eventually, Aniston's character is redeemed after she's forced to follow her heart and go for simple things, like a nice guy. If this isn't romance, I don't know what is. But for me, the life that romance lifts her from tells us much more about the real Los Angeles than love does.
Not to put too much of a meta-narrative spin on this, Friends with Money can also be a metaphor for what the independent film scene has become. (House-cleaning could just as easily be another.) At Sundance, you might say, there's plenty of money, but the friends are harder to find. Has the infusion of money made independent films better films? The jury's still out as to whether the infusion of money into Sundance has made this a better experience for those of us who don't have it. Money certainly doesn't make you any more free if you're one of Nicole Holofcener's characters, although the dilemma of how to be happy if you have money is a luxury that most of the world would love to try. We comfort slaves are lucky to have such "problems."
But where there's money, there's usually art, and there was art at the Library Center in Park City Friday night, January 21. In Destricted, there was sex, too, in the art. (It's funny to think of this, because Utah is a place where authorities are vigilant about the kinds of books that they allow into their libraries, and sometimes fierce about throwing "offensive" books out. Anything that could penetrate the human body was in action on the screen this time.)
With roots protruding from his body, an unidentified man gets intimate with machines - a truck, to be exact - in Hoist, Matthew Barney's contribution to Destricted, a group of short films by six directors doing independent pornography. Each film in Destricted, by such contributors as Sam Taylor-Wood, Richard Prince, Larry Clark, Marina Abramovic and Gaspar Noé, was offered as "cerebral" work that reinvigorates erotic cinema.
Make pornography, the filmmakers were told, "do anything you want, as long as you do it in less than 20 minutes," said Larry Clark, who pairs a novice would-be porn stallion with a forty-ish veteran in Impaled.
Clark's cast for his odd short was assembled from casting calls for male and female porn performers. The males, all first-timers, most of them younger than twenty, were experienced porn watchers (everyman a porn star?) and the women were all in the business, but also very young. Most of the young men not only watched porn, they got it from their parents. Clark, as we know, has a way of getting youth to be candid and compliant. Is it exploitation? You decide. It works once again as his interviewees talk about sex for money on the screen - the men talking about their particular sex preferences and ego needs, and the women talking more about the job as a job. The second half of Impaled is the coupling of Clark's Odd Couple, a pale skinny sullen kid of twenty and a giggling nympho twice his age. Not knowing whether the performers were in on the joke or not makes the joke even better.
The project renews Sundance's mission to push the boundaries of sex and gender in a pro-Bush state where some locals still practice polygamy and Brokeback Mountain was banned in a town nearby.
Sam Taylor-Wood chipped with Onan: Death Valley, failed self-stimulation in a majestic landscape. Destricted elicits the question, "Is pornography better if it's made, not by porn pros, but by artists, especially hot cross-over personalities like Barney and Sam Taylor-Wood?" Another inevitable question follows: "Is cinema better when those artists make it?"
Did the mostly young crowd screaming for more porn know that Harry Reems, hero of Deep Throat, the classic of porn's golden era, is living and selling real estate in Park City? That fact never came up at the screening that I attended.
Sharing the art bill at Sundance are a documentary about Sally Mann and a wry adaptation of Dan Clowes's graphic novel, Art School Confidential, by Terry Zwigoff (Crumb, Bad Santa). More about those and other films on art in a later installment.
At the other end of the fashion spectrum from the art stars and the fans who sustain them is Alan Berliner, a filmmaker who's been at Sundance several times with films like Intimate Stranger and The Family Album. I've always liked his work, which has had at its core the rapid-fire succession of still images to make movies that sometimes looked like old-fashioned flip books, sometimes like the torrent of images from within the brain that race ahead of what we would call consciousness. (One of the few inspiring moments of the Destricted porn-athon was Sync, Marco Brambilla's breakneck compilation of porn scenes, a cinematic salute to the idea of the "quickie." Was he trying to out-Berliner Berliner? If so, it was a very nice try.)
Wide Awake tells you what Berliner's film is about. He can't sleep, and this ailment touches everyone he's close to - his mother, his sister, his wife, even his newborn child. Berliner tries everything for his insomnia. We learn that he's been taking sleeping pills in quantities that are far more than what his doctor prescribed. We also learn that physicians who are sleep specialists know far less about sleep than we might think, which doesn't keep them from treating hard cases like Berliner's.
Ultimately our hero decides that he has to be positive, and he accepts that his insomnia gives him more time in which to be productive. Getting to that conclusion takes us through Berliner's creative process of fatigue and energy, and through his family - it's nothing if not a personal film.
But it's more than that. Insomnia isn't AIDS or cancer, so journeying through it with a man who can even have a sense of humor about his affliction doesn't tear us inside out as so many of the disease-of-the-week movies do. As a malady, insomnia is disease-lite. One out of three Americans suffers from it, and Berliner explains that we make all sorts of allowances for an affliction that we're forced to live with. There's a great line that he uses to illustrate this accommodation: "If you boil a frog slowly, the frog never knows there's anything wrong." Remember that. It helps us understand a lot.
There's even more. If this is a film about a Jewish family, and it is, among many other things, since so much of the discussion of insomnia takes place at a table with Berliner and his mother and sister, it's also a story that's a twist on the formula of helping a schlemiel fall in love. In this case, family members are stumbling over each other (or just yelling), trying to help a schlemiel fall asleep, which we learn is harder than love. It's like life, or like the family. Berliner can't slay the dragon. He has to manage the dragon.
As you might have guessed, for a prodigious cinema collagist like Berliner, archival textures are woven, sequenced, overlaid and just piled on. His own filming gives the film a special glow because so much of it happens with night vision, the same kind of technique used to hunt insurgents in Iraq or to observe nocturnal species in their active hours. Berliner himself is an odd twist on the nocturnal species, seen by himself, watching his family watch him. As sick as he is, if insomnia is indeed a sickness, first-person filmmaking is alive and well.
Posted by dwhudson at 1:58 PM
| Comments (2)
Munich, 1/21.
Tony Kushner in the Los Angeles Times: In the last month, the co-creators of Munich have been accused of being apologists for the Palestinians, apologists for Israel, defamers of Palestinians and of Israel, softheaded Hollywood liberals, dupes of the radical left, dupes of the radical right, even of being anti-Semitic or self-loathing, for showing Jews talking about receipts and handling money. We're morally confused, overly complicated, simplistic. We're cowards who refused to take sides. We took a side but, oops! the wrong side. Updates: 1/28. And so, he addresses the questions most commonly raised: What about that book the film's based on, why are the Mossad agents troubled and is he out to destroy Israel. His cousin-in-law, "and about 100 other people, suggested that maybe, in the midst of this storm of opinion, I could venture to speak a little for the film." What follows is an absolute must-read. But if you're in a hurry (e.g., racing between screenings in Park City), here's the crux:
In the film, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is presented not as a matter of religion versus religion, or sanity versus insanity, or good versus evil or civilization versus barbarism or Judeo-Christian culture versus Muslim culture, but rather as a struggle over territory, over geography, over home.
[...]
[W]e believe that one aspect of the struggle against terrorism is the struggle to comprehend terrorism. If you think understanding the enemy is unimportant, well, maybe there's a job in Washington for you.
Meantime. Here in Germany, we're still days away from the film's opening but the feuilletons have already been soaking in it for weeks. You can imagine that there's a plethora of complex reasons for all this interest, given the role of the Holocaust in speeding up the foundation of the state of Israel and the tragically botched handling by the German police of the crisis in 1972 that gives the film its name. And that's just for starters.
I know pointing to items in German is only going to be of interest to a few Daily readers, so I'll keep it short. Filmz.de has quite a collection; in today's papers alone, David Denk talks with Hanns Zischler about working with Spielberg while, also in die taz, Jan Feddersen addresses another German component of the story the film does not: Black September demanded not only the release of 232 Palestinian prisoners but also the release of Ulrike Meinhof and Andreas Baader, who were being held in German prison at the time. In the Berliner Zeitung, Jochen Arntz reconstructs events leading up to the early morning of September 5, 1972.
And there's Spielberg on the cover of Der Spiegel. Going by the online TOC, it looks as if 20 or so pages are devoted to the film and related issues. We'll see when it hits newsstands tomorrow. Hopefully, at least a few of those pages will be appearing in English as well.
Update, 1/22: The Observer is claiming that Andrew Anthony's is going to be the only interview Spielberg gives in Britain; we'll see. There aren't a great many revelations here. Reaffirmation, mostly: "I made this movie out of love for both of my countries, USA and Israel.... I tried to avoid making it and yet I feel that my filmography would not have been complete without this story in some fashion being realised on film.... I have to rely on my intuition, and as a filmmaker I had to commit to my feelings that the real Avner was the real deal, and I really in my heart and soul believe he is." And then, this: "I grew up in a world of potential nuclear holocaust. And for some reason I feel that the age of terrorism is more frightening to me than nuclear terror."
More from Edward Copeland.
Updates, 1/25: Spiegel Online is indeed running Christopher Sultan's translation of the cover story; it's not the interview, but it's a solid piece.
A quick run-down of relevant pieces in the German-language papers on the eve of the film's opening here: Adrienne Woltersdorf and Sven von Reden in die taz, Daniel Kothensculte in the Frankfurter Rundschau, Alexandra Stäheli in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung and Hanns-Georg Rodek and Hanns Zischler in Die Welt. That's just online. The FAZ and Süddeutsche have much more, but only in print.
Updates, 1/26: And now, Spiegel Online is running the interview, too. What's more they've translated an editorial that ran in the weekly's September 11, 1972 issue.
As the film opens in the UK, Ewen MacAskill and Ian Black report in the Guardian on two docs that "undermine some of its central claims. Operation Bayonet, on BBC2 on Tuesday, and Munich: Mossad's Revenge, on Channel 4 tonight, include detailed testimony from retired Mossad agents the broadcasters claim were directly involved in the killings. Their version of events is very different to Spielberg's."
Update, 1/27: Stephen Howe in openDemocracy: "[W]hile Munich may be a soaraway success as a magnet for political controversy, as a film it's as near to total artistic failure as Spielberg has ever come."
Peter Bradshaw in the Guardian: "The movie is all about the homeland of Israel-Palestine, but there's no doubt where its emotional homeland is: and that is the United States."
Posted by dwhudson at 12:04 PM
Berlin & Beyond.
Koreanfilm.org contributor Adam Hartzell samples a few German-language offerings in San Francisco.
Johannes Brunner's Oktoberfest (Germany, 2005) came closest to not meeting my extremely lenient qualifications. In the intertwined stories meant to represent a dodge-'em car amusement ride of lives bouncing off each other, there are some interesting interactions, but too many of the efforts to push the plot along seem contrived. The film begins on the last day of Oktoberfest and we follow this day in the lives of Germans and Africans working the beer gardens, young women from Hamburg down on holiday, a Japanese couple on honeymoon, three generations of a family running a haunted house ride, a divorced father spending the day with his reluctant older daughter and excited younger son, a young German man playing cat and mouse with security, and Italian tourists. Players in each storyline will intermix at some point in the film. Many of these random trajectories are believable, considering the dizzying mass confusion that such an event allows.
The film is not a celebration of Oktoberfest; instead, it primarily focuses on the pathetic goings on behind all the pretty lights and carnival noise. Oktoberfest the movie definitely leaves you with more reservations about getting reservations to attend Oktoberfest the event. Similarly, I'm reluctant to recommend the film simply because there are too many weak moments, such as the lack of motivation behind the infidelity of the leader of the oompah-pah band in the main beer hall and several love-at-first-sights that seem to happen way too easily. Oktoberfest is a ride better avoided, unless you have your own memories of Oktoberfest you'd like to revisit.
Next rung up the critical ladder is Hannes Stöhr's Night on Earth-inspired One Day In Europe (Germany/Spain, 2005). Stöhr takes us to four different locales on the final day of the European Soccer Championships. Connecting all our stories are not Jarmusch's taxi cabs, but alternating legitimate and illegitimate insurance claims that require assistance from the local police. An English woman robbed of all her luggage is befriended by a non-English-speaking Russian grandmother in Moscow. A German tourist fakes the loss of his possessions while in Turkey in order to acquire cash from his insurance company and stumbles into the taxi cab of a Turkish citizen who, rather than rush him to the police station, offers to beat the living crap out of the individuals who never mugged the German in the first place. A too-friendly Hungarian will meet a Spanish police officer after naively asking a stranger to take a picture of him standing in front of a major tourist spot in Santiago de Campostela, losing his digital camera and all 500 photos of his pilgrimage in the process.
And finally, French street performers in Berlin fake a mugging so as to attain insurance money to repair their broken down vehicle. Evident of the little effect this film had on me, I had trouble recalling what happened in the final story. (The friend I brought with me reminded me that it worked off the efficiency for which the Berlin police are apparently known, an efficiency this story desired to emulate because it seemed to be the quickest of the four and ended quite abruptly.) Stöhr is obviously serving up his own L'Auberge espagnole in exploring the comic possibilities of the emerging European Union identity. The highlights for me were the first two stories, particularly the second where laughter erupted from the audience when the Turkish cab driver begins speaking not only German, but German of the Schwäbisch dialect, which many linguists argue is the most divergent of German dialects from the mainstream Hochdeutsch taught in schools. As Stöhr commented in the Q&A afterwards, you couldn't make up a character like the real-life Turkish-born actor Erdal Yildiz who played that character. Yildiz indeed learned his German in the Swabian regions and he has appeared in many German television and film productions.
Speaking of Turkish-Germans, Anno Saul's Kebab Connection (Germany, 2004) was the film I was most excited to see at this year's Berlin & Beyond. Thankfully, this film, co-produced by Fatih Akin (Head-On) lived up to my hopes and was the perfect introduction to German film for the friend who accompanied me. Ingrid Eggers, organizer and co-founder of the Berlin & Beyond Film Festival, introduced the film as one of the rare comedies playing the festival this year, which brought a laugh from the audience well aware that German films are more known for looking at our shadows than our jesters.
A young Turkish Tarantino named Ibo (Denis Moschitto) directs stylish splatterfest commercials for his Uncle's kebab stand that generate serious traffic after being screened at the local Kino. As his star begins to rise, he discovers that his German girlfriend's belly is beginning to as well. Ibo's father has been lenient about Ibo messing around with German girls, asking only one thing - not to get them pregnant. Having failed that one request, Ibo’s father disowns him. Ibo's indecisiveness about how to resolve all this family and career confusion begins to frustrate his girlfriend and the comedy definitely milks this confusion for all its worth. Cultural inside jokes abound (add to the mix that Ibo's uncle's main competitor is a Greek restaurant across the street), but even if one is hip to neither the Turkish nor the German references, the film has enough universal humor about young adulthood, young parenthood and family politics that even the most apolitical could find the humor in this flick.
Wanting to see a film based in Salzburg so I could have the pleasure in recognizing sights from that lovely city, I caught another of the rare comedies, Wolfgang Murnberger's Silentium, which we were told was a huge hit in Austria in 2005. This dark comedy takes some definitely cavernous routes to unearth humor, working off the sexual abuse scandals in the Catholic Church. We meet the unemployed private investigator Brenner (Josef Hader) just as he becomes unemployed and quickly stumbles into getting hired by the daughter (Maria Köstlinger) of a famous festival promoter. She wants Brenner to find out who murdered her husband. Her husband had accused the archbishop of sexually molesting him when he was younger and the town has been led to believe that her husband committed suicide. Brenner finds much more than he bargained for as he digs deeper and deeper into the goings on of the local diocese and the festival promoter.
For the most part, the film is a laugh riot. The topic allows for some hilarious irreverence involving multiple Catholic icons. Plus, there's an expertly done parody of North by Northwest. But the film loses itself in the resolution of all the secrets hidden in the catacombs of Salzburg's Da Vinci Code. When the puzzle pieces fall into place, the picture is just too outlandish to be believable. Plus, Silentium continues the long tradition of limiting the roles available to actresses of Asian descents, something that has tainted films of otherwise exemplary quality such as Priscilla, Queen of the Desert. (One thing I learned from Silentium is the German language variant of that schoolyard racist taunt 'Chinese/Japanese.' Perhaps there are English variants I'm not aware of, but the German translation we were given of the final couplet "Dirty knees/Look at these" was replaced with "Owl/Fowl." The person reciting the rhyme uses his fingers to widen his eyes when saying "Owl" and then the person the rhyme is being recited to is bonked on the head when he says "Fowl." Some universals divide more than unite, I guess.) The same old, same old that rears its ugly Western eyes here is a tired cliché if not offensive. I'm not for censorship, so Murnberger can do whatever he wants, but I don't have to like this part of the film. Unfortunately, I can't reveal a more detailed argument about the problems with this aspect of the film because it is part of a crucial twist in the plot. Therefore, I can't deflect dirty knee jerks from calling my comments mere political correctness. Like the confessional ethics of priests, I have my own ethical code of silence when writing about films in a forum bounded by the same decorum as a review.
But enough of disappointment; the best of the bunch I caught was the film awarded Best New Feature at the festival, Robert Thalheim's Netto (Germany, 2004). Netto follows a divorced father, Marcel Werner (Milan Peschel) with impulse control problems exacerbated by his drinking problem. We meet him ordering a Clausthaler at a local Chinese restaurant and his conversation demonstrates how Marcel has difficulty properly discerning social cues, going on and on about his delusional life when it is clear no one at the restaurant is really interested in what he has to say. Although unemployment is a problem affecting everyone in Germany, we can see why this particular man has trouble keeping a job. His son Sebastian (Sebastian Butz) re-enters Marcel's life in an effort to avoid changing schools after his mother moves into the home of her new husband. Sebastian ends up being his father's surrogate father by assisting him in getting the security-related position his father fantasizes about.
Butz's portrayal is impressive and Peschel puts in a quality performance as well. Thalheim makes some nice shot choices, such as Marcel bike-peddling past important sites in Berlin as if staking them out for security preparations. There is a hilarious scene when Marcel acts out his secret service fantasies that Thalheim gives us from a surveillance camera overhead shot that wonderfully underscores the scene. (What's this about the Germans not being funny?) Weaving in and out of the film is the country music of the "Johnny Cash of East Berlin," Peter Tschernig, and it works nicely throughout the film. The only other films I saw up for the Best First Feature award were the aforementioned poor Oktoberfest and a film I saw in Busan, Benjamin Heisenberg's compelling Sleeper (Germany, 2005), so I can't speak for all of them but I find Netto a more than worthy choice.
I was limited in what I could watch over this three-day weekend by a cold or flu or something else I'm self-diagnosing. (On the phone, my father on the phone advised me to "make sure it's not that bird flu.") Particularly disappointing was missing Curt and Robert Siodmak, Edgar G Ulmer and Fred Zinnemann's silent film, People on Sunday (Germany, 1929). And I felt obligated to catch at least some of the Michael Verhoeven films featured since The Nasty Girl was the first film I ever saw with subtitles, catching it back during its initial release in the US at either the Tivoli Theatre or the Hi-Pointe Theatre in St Louis. I now prefer to read my films and Verhoeven can take some of the credit for that. At least I got to see films like Netto and Kebab Connection that will be staying with me longer than this cold, hopefully.
Posted by dwhudson at 7:06 AM
| Comments (3)
January 20, 2006
Shorts, 1/20.
"Like the best of his still image work (the Disaster series and the big Marilyn and Elvis paintings), Warhol's silent films and some of his early 'talkies' exist in the tension between presence and absence, assertion and denial. Fetishistic in the extreme, they allow the receptive viewer access to the fundamentals of cinematic pleasure. Their surfaces open onto the depths of your psyche." That's Amy Taubin's take now; but she's actually in a few of these films: "I was fascinated by Warhol's work process - how he made himself a still point in the midst of a chaos that fed him even as he kept himself apart from it - but I found the Factory scene as clique-ridden and unpleasant as high school."
Also in the City Pages: Rob Nelson on The Last Waltz and Matthew Wilder on Match Point. More on that one from AO Scott in the New York Times: "You would have to go back to the heady, amoral heyday of Ernst Lubitsch or Billy Wilder to find cynicism so deftly turned into superior entertainment." But then, Jack Stoller: "The central flaw of this film is a theme reminiscent of Crimes and Misdemeanors, that people who do unjust things in a godless universe can get away with it. An important difference is that Crimes and Misdemeanors portrayed this as a bad thing." Update: NP Thompson simply despises Match Point.
Lists definitely worth waiting for: Brian Darr, Dennis Cozzalio and, at Twitch, Dave Canfield.
DK Holm has a massive all-Japanese column up at Movie Poop Shoot, reviewing five Kurosawa films, four samurai films, two "elder sister" exploitation films, the Pinky Violence Collection, a few films by Donald Richie as well as Richie's books A Hundred Years of Japanese Film, The Donald Richie Reader: 50 Years of Writing on Film and The Japan Journals: 1947 - 2004 - and Alain Silver's newly revised The Samurai Film. Heavens.
Sam Adams in the Philadelphia City Paper: "Fond of barren landscapes, blackout gags and Sisyphean slopes, [Luc] Moullet is, like the Parisian rebels of May 1968, 'Marxiste, tendence Groucho,' a slapstick anarchist who expresses his hostility to the modern world by refusing to take it seriously."
Girish: "The Passenger is ultimately and clearly a director's movie but I have to say that Jack Nicholson's performance in it is a thing of wonder: it’s scrupulously minimal, completely instinctive, and you could write a small book about its profuse subtleties." Also: "Naruse's Repast (1951) moves me because of the insistent way in which he focuses on the petty details of 'balancing the domestic books' that each day demanded in a household like our own."
"He may have been one of the great auteurs, but many of his films still have the spontaneity of home movies," writes Geoffrey Macnab in a piece with a sidebar by Leslie Caron. "While critics and fellow film-makers have long revered Renoir and films like La Règle du Jeu and La Grande Illusion nestle high up in many top 10 lists, few of his 40 or so other features are in active circulation." Also in the Independent, Judy Meewezen praises Elizabeth McGovern's performance in the indie thriller, The Truth.
At the newly redesigned site for the LA Weekly, there's a box, top and center, labeled "Foundas vs Ebert." It is, in a way, a mini-blog, linking to all the stops necessary to follow Scott Foundas's response to Roger Ebert's defense of Crash in the wake of Foundas's attack on the film in the latest (last?) round of Slate's "Movie Club." For good measure, the LAW tosses in Foundas's appreciation of Ebert this summer when the Chicago-based critic got his star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. So why would you follow all this? One of the points at hand is the question of how critics best serve their readers. In a sense, both could claim to be "right" since their readerships probably differ considerably; but that doesn't settle it entirely, either, of course.
Brian Brooks unveils the third edition of indieWIRE's "Guide to Acquisitions": "The list is designed, we hope, to give insight to indieWIRE readers, especially emerging filmmakers and producers, who may not be familiar with some of the people behind this fundamental aspect of the film business."
The New York Press film critics do their bit for the Brooklyn issue. Armond White looks back: "By putting Black Brooklyn on the big screen, [Spike] Lee followed the footsteps of preceding borough ambassadors who won prominence without instituting change."
"[W]hat's happening in Brooklyn is still very much under the radar. It's less a fullblown Renaissance than a percolating scene that has yet to erupt into national view," writes Matt Zoller Seitz. Also: Jennifer Merin interviews Richard Shepard, director of The Matador.
Charles Taylor: "Few recent movies offer the sense of being deeply engaged with the world, or the quiet, enveloping elation, that Mr Hou's Café Lumière does." More from Jonathan Rosenbaum in the Chicago Reader and Scott Tobias in the AV Club. Also in the New York Observer: Andrew Sarris on Fun with Dick and Jane.
Nick Davis resumes picking flicks.
For the Los Angeles Times, Reed Johnson visits the set of Nacho Libre, "a bruising comedy" directed by Jared Hess (Napoleon Dynamite) and starring Jack Black, now scarred for life. Literally. Related in a roundabout sort of way: "There's more to Mexican superheroes than masked wrestlers," notes Sean Spillane at Bitter Cinema.
When the great production designer Ken Adam sits down to talk with the Telegraph's Mark Monahan about a favorite movie, he chooses Casablanca.
The Bafta nominations are in and, as the Guardian reports, The Constant Gardener is the front-runner, with Brokeback Mountain and Crash close behind.
"When we launched our competition for films shot and edited on home computers - what we termed "laptop movies" - we had very little idea of what we were going to find," writes Guardian film editor Andrew Pulver. Turns out, 140 DVDs came in and the "10-strong final shortlist included some powerful work... But the winner was absolutely clear; it won in a walk... One Night in Powder is the brainchild of Jason Attar and Phil Jones, and is a brilliantly realised film. It's genuinely funny - and if you've sat through as many comedies as I have, you know the real thing as soon as you see it."
Also in the Guardian:
Matt Zoller Seitz introduces a new feature, "offerings from the three dozen or so film and TV-related books that I never tire of reading." More than that, though, he comments throughout. First up is a clip from David Mamet's On Directing Film.
Dave Kehr reports on Showtime's cancelation of the broadcast of Takashi Miike's Imprint, which was to have been part of the Masters of Horror series; it does sound pretty gruesome, actually, and will probably do well on DVD.
Also in the New York Times:
Neil Jordan's on-again, off-again Borgia is on again. Hannah Eaves interviews the director for PopMatters. Also, Terry Sawyer: "Mind Over Matters: Meta-Bullshit: The Trouble with Sarah Silverman and the Fawning Cult of Meta-Bigotry."
Somewhat related: Andy Klein in the LA CityBeat on The Aristocrats on DVD and the two hours-worth of new stuff: "A perfect example of a bit that is hysterical but was omitted for good reason is Kevin Pollak telling the joke in the persona of Albert Brooks. It's just as funny as the scene in the film where Pollak does the joke as Christopher Walken; but it would have seemed redundant and structurally strange for [Paul] Provenza and [Penn] Jillette to have included two lengthy Pollak impersonation routines, no matter how great they are."
Daniel Robert Epstein's latest interviews at SuicideGirls: Wayne Wang and Melvin Van Peebles. Related: AO Scott in the NYT on How to Eat Your Watermelon in White Company (And Enjoy It): "The story that emerges is a fascinating historical document."
Rick Curnutte: "With whip-smart writing, quirky characters (and actors) and a propulsive, addictingly playful aesthetic, The Land of College Prophets has the potential to be a sleeper cult film in the future. It's the greatest Alex Cox film that Alex Cox never made."
Steve Erickson: "As satire, Manderlay hits home in a way that Dancer in the Dark and Dogville never did."
Crashcam Films: Very, very busy, up to all sorts of mischief, reports Marc Savlov. Also in the Austin Chronicle: Spencer Parsons previews the Austin Jewish Film Festival, January 21 through 27, and Raoul Hernandez reviews The Bad Sleep Well.
"I think in every season we've based our A-story - which is the main terrorist story - on plausible scenarios. But just because it's plausible doesn't make it probable." 24 writer Michael Loceff talks to James Surowiecki in Slate.
Grady Hendrix on The Promise: "Chen [Kaige]'s focused on is how things look, and they look gooood."
"Who knew?" At the Culture Blog, Amy Moon passes along an observation from San Francisco Chronicle columnist Chuck Nevius as to who's watching Brokeback Mountain. Related: James Wolcott on conservatives' reactions so far; Mark Steyn, via Jason Morehead; via Gabriel Shanks, Nell Minow in the Chicago Tribune on last year's most homophobic onscreen moments; and Patrick Macias: "This just in: American girls are mining the missing link between gay cowboys and fruity J-pop from the Johnny's jimsho."
Trying to steer clear of the Oscars before they become unavoidable (all too soon now, I'm sure), but this is too good to pass up: David Kronke talks with Alonso Duralde, author of 101 Must-See Movies for Gay Men, about, yes, the Oscars.
Adam Balz at Not Coming to a Theater Near You: "The American Astronaut is an experiment in genre-bending. It's a western without any high-noon shootouts, a sci-fi work of art with musical numbers, a drama with exaggerated characters."
Peter Nellhaus: "[W]hile [Derek] Jarman made his film about his own country twenty years ago, The Last of England has resonance for contemporary American viewers."
Producer Ted Hope pitches 1000 Bloody Red Pieces of Sarah to Filmmaker.
Getting their kicks at Noir City: Natalija Vekic at Scene and Unseen and Sara Schieron at Filmshi.com.
Online browsing tip. Famous for 15mb. Via Screenhead.
Online listening tip. Harry Nilsson's soundtrack for Otto Preminger's Skidoo at If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger...
Online going-deep tip. The Tulse Luper Journey. Thanks, Ed.
Online viewing tip #1. Nathaniel Stern reworks Woody Allen at DVblog.
Online viewing tip #2. A teenaged Jodie Foster sings. Harmonizing with herself. In French. Via Coudal Partners.
Online viewing tip #3. That UK Honda Civic ad; links gathered at Boing Boing.
Online viewing tips. "Top 65 Music Videos of 2005," a different batch from m3 online via Waxy.org.
Posted by dwhudson at 4:25 PM
| Comments (4)
Docs, 1/20.
Why We Fight "stands out for its passion, ambition and clarion-call sincerity, even amid the contemporary onslaught of political documentaries," writes Andrew O'Hehir at Salon, leading into his interview with director Eugene Jarecki, who also talks to indieWIRE's Jason Guerrasio and is a guest on the Leonard Lopate Show.
"Every documentary-maker today walking the planet at one point or another gets the question about Michael Moore," Jarecki tells The Reeler. But that's ok; Moore has "lifted all the boats," and besides: "There was just kind of a coincidence in the past couple of years, which is that right when the world was becoming far more complicated and the public was sensing that needed to understand it that much more clearly - right at that time, thanks to the forces of corporatism in media, there was a collapse of trust in the source we usually turn to."
Updates: 1/22.
Manohla Dargis in the New York Times: "[E]ven those of radical political persuasion might find it hard to accept Mr Jarecki's argument that American militarism is, underneath the talk about freedom and democracy, a simple question of dollars."
More in the Los Angeles Times from Susan King and Kevin Crust, who writes, "[T]he last 12 months have been full of revelations that generally add to the film's persuasiveness."
Cinematical's Karina Longworth finds it a "solid, classy film, but its Frontline-esque obsession with 'fairness' (the polar opposite of Fox News' cocksure 'Fair and Balanced' pretense) prevents Jarecki from producing anything particularly intellectually devastating."
In the San Francisco Bay Guardian, Johnny Ray Huston and AC Thompson recommend After Innocence. More from Laura Barcella at Alternet, where Rory O'Conner writes, "If the lessons of Peru's State of Fear continue to go unheeded, we may all soon be living in the 'United States of Fear.'"
Cinematical's Kim Voynar interviews Rachel Grady, who made The Boys of Baraka with Heidi Ewing.
Update, 1/22: Michael Joshua Rowin in Stop Smiling: "Better now than never but still unable to shake a heavy feeling of inconsequentiality, Eugene Jarecki's documentary Why We Fight arrives one year after the beginning of George W Bush's second term to challenge the pretender-in-chief's foreign imperialism and provide historical context for the systemic militarism that has led to it."
More from Kevin Canfield at Nerve.
Posted by dwhudson at 1:43 PM
From Korea, 1/20.
At Twitch, X translates highlights from Film 2.0's interview with Kim Sung-soo. Topic #1: Running Wild.
Paolo Bertolin interviews Cho Chang-ho, director of The Peter Pan Formula, for Koreanfilm.org.
Filmbrain: "With its sepia-toned nostalgic look, The President's Barber is certainly an interesting film, if only to witness director Lim [Chan-sang] unique look at the Park years. However, its awkward mixture of feel-good dramatics and miscalculated attempts at dark comedy result in a film that is neither biting satire nor emotionally involving drama."
Jason Morehead's glad Park Chan-wook will be moving on now: "Whereas Sympathy For Mr Vengeance spirals downwards into despair, drawing ever closer to a tragic conclusion, and Oldboy moves with a laser-like intensity, Sympathy For Lady Vengeance slowly meanders all over the place, with odd tonal shifts and plot turns that make sense but are completely nonsensical."
Brian Darr in San Francisco: "The fourth, and so far, biggest SF Korean-American Film Festival runs February 7 - 12 and will include a special focus on North Korea, including a rare screening of a film made there in 1972, The Flower Girl."
Posted by dwhudson at 1:31 PM
| Comments (1)
Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World.
Nathan Rabin: "Like The Aristocrats, Looking succeeds smashingly both as a comedy and as a savvy deconstruction of comedy." Also in the AV Club: Scott Tobias interviews Albert Brooks, who also appears on Fresh Air and talks to Hollywood Bitchslap's Peter Sobczynski (his review).
The LA Weekly's Scott Foundas gets Brooks on the phone ("He is, others have suggested, the most hermitic director since Stanley Kubrick, who was himself said to be a Brooks aficionado."): "The movie's called Looking, not Finding. That's a big difference. It's never claimed in the title that a goal is going to be reached. You know, in the cartoon I did, it was Finding Nemo."
Cue AO Scott in the New York Times: "Mr Brooks likes to deprecate both himself and the work for hire he does in Hollywood, but the difference between Nemo and his own films may not be as great as he pretends."
Updates: 1/22.
Jonathan Rosenbaum in the Chicago Reader: "His film is especially welcome now because it frankly admits that most Americans are ignorant about Muslims and have a lot to learn, in contrast with the few other Hollywood movies dealing with Muslims - Syriana, Munich - which seem to suggest that non-Muslim viewers can emerge knowing the score."
Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times: "Veteran Brooks-watchers will be able to hear the secret melodies and appreciate the way he throws away even the throwaways."
Nope, counters the Oregonian's Mike Russell: "[I]t's hard to figure out who "Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World" is supposed to entertain, much less enlighten."
Salon's Stephanie Zacharek finds the film "timid and unshaped." For the Los Angeles Times' Kevin Crust, it's "not Brooks' funniest film, but it possesses his trademark wry humor and is slyly observant."
Stephen Metcalf in Slate: "But, oh, this premise. It is every bit the albatross it sounds."
Andy Klein in the LA CityBeat: "Despite the title, this may be the safest film Brooks has ever done."
Updates, 1/22: Noy Thrupkaew for the American Prospect: "There's a way to critique myopia without being myopic, of course."
At World/Independent Film, Marcy Dermansky finds it "a genuine disappointment."
Posted by dwhudson at 1:10 PM
| Comments (2)
The New New World.
FX Feeney in the LA Weekly: "Speaking as one who feels Terrence Malick's latest was not just the best film of last year, but one of the greatest I have ever seen, I didn't want him to cut so much as a frame from the version that opened in limited release over Christmas. Happily - if strangely - the new, leaner version, opening nationwide on Friday, is not merely a 'shorter cut,' but a whole new draft of the film."
Max Goldberg disagrees in the San Francisco Bay Guardian: "The New World really is what it seems: a fascinating failure with brilliant flourishes weighing against strained seriousness and muddled lyricism." Kimberly Chun meets the film's star, Q'Orianka Kilcher, also profiled by John Harlow in the Times of London and interviewed by Cinematical's James Rocchi.
Updates: 1/22.
Via Movie City Indie, Mick LaSalle in the San Francisco Chronicle: "Malick uses cinema in a way no one else uses it, in a way that no one else has ever used it. Through elliptical and seemingly oblique methods, he forges moments of staggering emotional power."
For the New York Times' Manohla Dargis, even this edited version is "the first necessary film of this young year." More praise from Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times and Anhoni Patel at Scene and Unseen.
Update: Jeffrey Overstreet in Christianity Today: "Ultimately, The New World defines true love as something more than desire, nostalgia, or sexual chemistry. It boldly condones a higher love characterized by selflessness and fidelity, love that shelters, protects, honors, and heals."
Update, 1/21: Dana Stevens in Slate: "It makes sense that Malick never finished his thesis in philosophy at Oxford. In a way, he's still writing it, using his films as scratchpads to work through questions like the one John Smith poses to himself, early in the film: 'What voice is this that speaks within me, guides me toward the best?'"
Update, 1/22: Peter T Chattaway for Canadian Christianity and Joshua Gibson at Fagistan.
Posted by dwhudson at 1:02 PM
Park City. Elsewhere, 1/20.
Sundance, Slamdance and all the other hoopla going on in Park City give us all a breather between the Globes and Oscars to, as Manohla Dargis puts it, "partake in that collective fiction known as the American independent film movement." The crux of her tone-perfect preview of the festival that's become "wildly annoying, but invaluable": "The [studios'] special divisions have been good for American mainstream cinema, but they seem to have been murder on the little guys." Also in the New York Times: Lorne Manly tells the story behind Awesome! I Fuckin' Shot That!, the Beastie Boys movie shot by 50 fans screening Saturday night at Sundance. Ok, the online hubs to keep an eye on throughout the fest (besides this one, of course):
Anthony Breznican previews ten films screening at Sundance for USA Today. One of them is Moonshine, which has a total budget of "$9,200, including the cost of a Panasonic camera, a PowerBook G4 and website hosting," reports Jason Silverman at Wired News. At Sundance, "a total of 90 movies - including Moonshine and 24 of the 32 works in the Independent Film Competition - will be projected digitally. That's double the number in 2004."
Denis Seguin previews Kirby Dick's This Film Is Not Yet Rated for the Times of London.
Amazon is using the fest as a launching pad of sorts for its foray into online TV, Amazon Fishbowl With Bill Maher. The AP's Allison Linn reports: "The company plans to record the first show at the Sundance Film Festival this weekend, with guests including authors Stephen King and Armistead Maupin, musician Rob Thomas and actress Toni Collette. It will then preview tidbits of that show beginning Tuesday and leading up to the June 1 launch."
For those of us who can't make it to Park City, MaryAnn Johanson suggests a few ways to throw yourself a DIY Sundance: "Don't forget to overcharge yourself for snacks, and consider hiring some hip neighborhood teenagers to come in and snub you."
Posted by dwhudson at 12:52 PM
SF Indie Fest. Lineup.
Via Todd at Twitch comes news that the SF Indie Fest (February 2 through 14) has announced its full lineup. Once again, the site is excellent. Select a film title - Filmic Achievement, for example - and just look: Necessary info right at the top, link to the official site, description, and along the side, links to all the other films. Bravo.
Posted by dwhudson at 9:12 AM
Berlinale. Forum, Perspektive, Retrospective.
Two more announcements from the Berlinale today. The program for the Forum is complete: 40 films, 21 of them world premieres and 15 of them debuts. 40 is too many to list and link here, but among the filmmakers represented are Chantal Akerman, James Benning, Fujiwara Toshi, Amos Gitai, Cho Chang-ho and on and on.
Also complete is the program for the Perspektive Deutsches Kino and special events for the Retrospective have been announced as well. One stands out. A newly restored version of Carl Theodor Dreyer's Michael will be screened at the Volksbühne on February 11, accompanied by music from ensembleKONTRASTE under the direction of Pierre Oser.
Posted by dwhudson at 6:00 AM
January 19, 2006
Park City Dispatch. 1.
Between David D'Arcy and Jonathan Marlow, along Hannah Eaves following the fate of Iraq in Fragments, we should be posting dispatches from Park City just about every day through the festivities. Today, David D'Arcy previews several of the films he's caught so far.
The Sundance Film Festival has shown amazing staying power. Everything from the Soviet Union to Enron to Miramax has crumbled in the years since I started coming to Park City in January.
Sundance 2006 opens tonight with the comedy Friends with Money by Nicole Holofcener. And every year we're tempted to spot trends - all the more so since a growing number of marketers and studios are watching closely, not just for films, but for anything new that can be sold to the people watching those films.
Independence is not just an attitude (or lack of funds) that filmmakers bring to the making of a movie. It's now a set of preferences found in a certain kind of consumer who buys cars, clothes, computers, food (for humans and dogs), and snowboards. More about that in another installment.
It's too soon for me to suggest what trends are here (if anyone actually cared) so I'll just concentrate on subject matter.
Politics. There are always politics at Sundance, partly because the position of independence presupposes that you have to be independent from something. This year films deal with Iraq, global warming, the complicated figure of Ralph Nader, racism in the courts, the Middle East and corporate power. Panels will surely fill in any gaps. The issue that strikes me as important and different this year is the border between Mexico and the US and the way in which the border has become the locus for our concerns about the much-deplored growing business of human trafficking, but also about crime, drugs, security and the "invasion" that threatens to transform the United States into a country that's not necessarily white and doesn't necessarily speak English. (Take the example of Park City. Everyone serving you in a low-wage job speaks Spanish.) In Crossing Arizona, Joseph Matthew tries to take the complex issue apart - character by character. It's a start.
Sex. At Sundance there always seems to be a quest for the New New Thing in sexual matter. This is the festival that brought us Sex: The Annabelle Chong Story, a portrait of the young woman who set the record for the number of sexual partners in a limited time period. I can't remember the details, but I can remember the lines of men who answered ads in the newspapers for a chance to be part of this historic event which has since been surpassed. Sundance also first screened Larry Clark's Kids, the grimly prophetic look at teenagers and sex. But these are films, and sex isn't just sex, it's performance. I'm looking forward to Destricted, in which different directors try their hands at pornography - from art world players like Matthew Barney and Sam Taylor-Wood to veterans like Larry Clark and Gaspar Noé who'll be mining old veins.
Gender. Not the same as sex, obviously. Look for The Night Listener, a collaboration between Armistead Maupin and Patrick Stettner about longing and deception. Robin Williams, always good, plays a writer for radio, just dropped by his lover, who's drawn to a young boy, a casualty of abuse. But does the boy really exist, or is this just another level of exploitation? There's also Small Town Gay Bar, produced by Kevin Smith, a story of a bar in the woods of Mississippi near Tupelo that the evangelicals couldn't kill - at least not yet - although a young gay man's death becomes part of the story. In both cases, Williams and Smith helped get these films made, carrying on a tradition of older, more successful independents giving back to a newer generation.
Investigation. Two films catch my fancy. This Film Is Not Yet Rated penetrates the hidden recesses of the MPAA's rating process, and all the pompous child-saving rhetoric that we've endured over the years. Kirby Dick shows that there's no reason why solid investigative journalism can't be funny. When you see who's making these decisions, and you hear the decisions explained by these people, you can't do anything but laugh - or tear your hair out. Also look for Who Killed the Electric Car? Anyone who had a chance seemed to stick a knife into the dream (and the manufactured reality) of a car that could be used every day without causing pollution or making noise. Your corporate friends at work, and the political officials who could have made a difference.
Art. I'm told that the Sundance Film Festival Director Geoff Gilmore has said that films about art submitted to the festival have grown at an alarming rate. And why not? Artists are assumed to be complicated characters and, in a society that has lost respect for just about everyone else, they're still revered. They're also as hot as anything in fashion. The selection here is mixed - By the Ways, A Journey with William Eggleston, a French doc and another of many about the photographer who seems to have caught on hard and fast with independents, the afore-mentioned group-porn Destricted and What Remains, Steven Cantor's portrait of the photographer Sally Mann. There's also Terry Zwigoff's funny Art School Confidential, with a script by graphic novelist Dan Clowes, and The Giant Buddhas, a doc with inside footage of the demolition of the Bamyan Buddhas in Afghanistan in 2001. There are sure to be new docs on the antiquities trade soon, giving the media frenzy now brewing over scandals at the Getty. They'll be lucky to get this kind of access. With so many films submitted and accepted, you have to wonder what they turned down.
There are some staples this year on the Sundance program. One welcome story that rarely worsens from wear is the investigation of the wrongly accused, wrongly convicted, wrongly imprisoned innocent man (although there have also been some women.) We all know that this story is as old as any story gets (remember Jesus Christ?), but in independent film it seems to have begun with The Thin Blue Line, Errol Morris's spare emotionless reconstruction of a man's wrongful conviction and death sentence for murder.
This year the "justice denied" film to watch is The Trials of Darryl Hunt, the chronicle of a black man's trial, conviction and imprisonment for the brutal rape and stabbing murder of a white woman journalist in Winston-Salem North Carolina in 1986. Déjà vu all over again, as Yogi Berra would say? Sure, but it reminds us of what seems to be the widening gap between justice and the justice system, and it has the kind of emotional hold on you that fiction aspires to and rarely reaches.
It's emotionally gripping because even though the genre seems to require redemption at the end - with either a live prisoner or a dead body honored for courage and fortitude - this documentary, directed by Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg, is truly an extreme case. It's been a while since I've come across a case in which law enforcement from top to bottom has been so determined to keep a wrongly convicted man behind bars, and we never really learn why. Perhaps that's another film. But I suspect that it's far from the most extreme. There are plenty of cases that are worse.
There's a can-you-top-this element to the "justice denied" genre. You find yourself incredulous at the corruption and stupidity that seems routine in law enforcement. And then there's the next film takes it to a higher level. In The Trials of Darryl Hunt, the wronged man defies your expectations about the nature of a criminal and keeps defying those expectations at every stage of his mistreatment. Somehow I doubt that we're even being told all that may have happened to him in prison, where guards offered to bring skinheads drugs if they agreed to kill him.
Hunt, who we're told had no family, seems unnaturally calm and gentle, which the jury should have noticed before it put the then-teenager away on the testimony of a prostitute who was well known to have problems telling the difference between fantasy and reality. In this case, rather than line up the usual suspects, they lined up the usual witnesses. A television correspondent tells us that the prosecutor spoke so convincingly that she could have been persuaded of anything. To be fair, it was also the press at the local newspaper that finally brought the government's case down.
As the film moves along, the young defendant/prisoner has the serene grin of a Buddhist monk and the patience of Job, as his lawyers first talk tough, and then break down in tears when the system fails at every level. Is Hunt all there, you wonder. Is it fatalism, or serenity? At one point, when a DNA test shows that Hunt's semen was not in the dead woman's vagina, prosecutors suggest, improbably, that it must then have been in some other orifice. At another point, when a man in prison for another brutal attack in Winston-Salem at the time confesses to the crimes that Hunt is jailed for committing, prosecutors assume that the rape and murder must have been committed by a team that included Hunt. I found myself laughing at the absurdity. Yet the defense lawyers stick with him, knowing that they are his only hope.
I won't give away the ending, which you can surely guess. See it for yourself, and be aware that the reality of the justice system is not the OJ verdict, as shameful as that was, but the imprisonment of innocent men in the face of overwhelming evidence. And remember, too, that this is North Carolina - the real Mayberry. Yet it seems to happen everywhere.
One other film worth seeing: As injustices go, Thank You for Smoking takes a lighter tone, although by sheer coincidence the great city of Winston-Salem figures in this one, too. It's a capital of the tobacco industry, and the hero of this satire practices one of the most-hated of all professions - he's a tobacco lobbyist.
If you've seen the trailers for this film, which seem to be playing everywhere, you know that it's about a lobbyist, which puts a fictional feature in an odd position, given the journalist glare on lobbying right now which could reach pretty close to the President. Normally, an issue is in the newspapers, and then a year later documentaries on that issue turn up at Sundance and at other film festivals. I'm sure that there are a dozens of teams trying to make the film about the evils of Jack Abramoff and the politicians that he and his cronies bribed. (For all I know, they've cleaned local stores out of black hats and trenchcoats for their re-enactment scenes.) I'll leave it to them to figure out how to keep any of those films down to feature length. How about an epic? The cast and the script should be no problem.
But here we're in a situation where the documentaries that I assume are being made are a year or so from being shown, and the feature, Thank You for Smoking is overtaken by events in the news. And when that happens, it's hard to compete with C-SPAN.
Jason Reitman, who directs his own script, can't be blamed for timing or for any other circumstances outside his control (now that really sounds like a lobbyist talking), and the film rings with more than laughs. There's lots of wry truth to it, starting with the volubly appealing frat snake of a protagonist who can smile his way through any kind of lie. He becomes the champion of kids with cancer, noting all the time that no direct link has been made between smoking and the disease. There's plenty of Orwellian double-speak here (although you can get that on the evening news for free) or it may be just that spin, which used to be called lying, has become such a fact of life that we analyze the techniques of spinning the same way we watch figure-skating, judging the argument as a performance rather than evaluating its elements of truth. Gun supporters become "Americans for Safety," or something like that, and a whiskey "institute" has another world-saving title.
There's more than a glimmer of the rogue Jack Abramoff in Nick Naylor, the rakish hero played by Aaron Eckhart. When a starlet of a journalist (Katie Holmes) whom he's slept with exposes his techniques and his unrepentant attitude toward them, he plays it for laughs at first, just like Abramoff used to imitate Marlon Brando in The Godfather. (I kept thinking, imagine what secrets Katie Holmes might get out of Tom Cruise when she sleeps with him.) As you'll see, our hero in Thank You for Smoking also had a glimmer of a conscience. We'll have to wait and see if Abramoff does.
One thing we know is that we'll be seeing more films about corruption in politics - the material is just too good to pass up - although I doubt that independents, because of their youth and inexperience, will be making the best ones. But that's a presumption, not a hard rule - give them a chance. There are plenty of stories. Corruption is the gift that keeps on giving.
Posted by dwhudson at 9:25 AM
| Comments (4)
Berlinale. Competition lineup, round 2.
The Berlinale has announced 14 more Competition entries; add the nine announced in December, and that makes 23. Just three more to go before the program's complete. The new ones:
Posted by dwhudson at 2:24 AM
January 18, 2006
GC article roundup. 3.
Since this is the third monthly roundup of articles that have recently appeared at the main site, this can now officially be called a regular feature (and here are roundups 1 and 2).
Two interviews by David D'Arcy have appeared in the past few weeks, and his introductions are always as engaging as the conversations themselves. As Munich opened, David first considered the film and the critical reaction to it before talking with Avi Mograbi about his film, Avenge But One of My Two Eyes, making for an intriguing juxtaposition.
On a related note, by the way, Tony Kushner, quoted at length at the end of that piece, defends the screenplay he co-wrote with Eric Roth for Spielberg's feature in an interview with Peter von Becker of Der Tagesspiegel today; that's in German, of course, but signandsight has a crucial paragraph in English.
If you were wondering why David D'Arcy's Tirana dispatch was numbered "1" when a second never appeared, well, it did, actually. At the main site in the form of an interview with Fatmir Koçi, best known for his award-winning Tirana Year Zero.
Two of our longest pieces in a while come from Sean Axmaker and Jonathan Marlow. Both interviewees have been working for decades and, while neither is known first and foremost as a director, both have directed unconventional and, in their own ways, unforgettable science fiction features. Odd, isn't it. Sean talks with special effects pioneer Douglas Trumbell (Silent Running and Brainstorm), Jonathan with LQ Jones (A Boy & His Dog).
And two seasoned writers each contributed their first piece for us around the turn of the new year: Heather Johnson talks with Judy Irving and Mark Bittner, the director and subject, respectively, of The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill; and John Esther speaks with Emily Mortimer about her role in Woody Allen's Match Point.
Posted by dwhudson at 1:38 PM
Sight & Sound. 2/06.
Tristram Shandy may be touted on the cover of the new issue of Sight & Sound, but online, the focus is clearly on Korean cinema. Grady Hendrix opens things up by addressing Western pre- and misconceptions:
The problem is that we've mistaken a discussion about violence for its glorification; we've stepped into the middle of a long-running conversation and thrown in our two cents with no idea of what was said before we entered the room. Korean movies do play rougher than we're used to, but what Park Chan-wook and Kim Ki-duk's recent films represent is only the latest collision between Korean cinema's class-consciousness, anti-authoritarian impulses and a long-standing taste for melodrama.
Speaking of Park, Ali Jaafar speaks to him. Briefly. About the trilogy. And James Bell has a shortish talk with Kim Jee-woon about A Bittersweet Life.
"So the spectator is both subjected to [Michael] Haneke's film and asked to take responsibility for it: he or she is at once the victim of the film and the guilty party." Catherine Wheatley on Caché.
Reviews:
Posted by dwhudson at 2:15 AM
| Comments (4)
January 17, 2006
Shorts, 1/17.
"The wondrously weird creatures who inhabit the films of French director Eugéne Green don't hail from earth as we know it," writes David Ng in the Village Voice. "They're the haloed offspring of two distinct but overlapping realms, the tangibly modern and the deliciously sublime. With three features and a short film, Green has staked out a small but fertile cinematic fiefdom where the spirits of Bresson and Ozu mingle with the eclectic likes of Monteverdi, the New Testament, and the Gap." A series runs at the Anthology Film Archives January 20 through 29.
Another filmmaker, another series (this one at the IFC Center, January 20 through 26), another assessment: Michael Atkinson on Lars von Trier. Also, Joshua Land on How to Eat Your Watermelon in White Company (and Enjoy It), a doc on "a remarkable life": Melvin Van Peebles.
Larry Doyle's pitch:
It's about more than an alien invasion, or a big dance contest, although if you're a fan of invading aliens or professional choreography you won't be disappointed. It's also a love story, born of deep space and lived on a underwater dance floor; and it;s about the characters: the hero, the babe, the bad guy, the black guy, the guy who was funny when he was on SNL, and others. More than anything, though, it's about freedom - the idea of freedom, as opposed to any specific exercise of it - and liberty, which is a different word than 'liberal,' and about the special effects, which are more special than ever before, and Crest Whitestrips, which - SPOILER ALERT - save humanity.
Also in the New Yorker: David Denby on Go for Zucker and Why We Fight. More on Zucker from J Hoberman in the Village Voice: "[Director Dani] Levy's project to restore a Jewish dimension to German culture is extremely circumspect in addressing that culture."
More on Why We Fight: Rob Nelson interviews director Eugene Jarecki for the Voice. Good question: "The film argues that the forces now at play in Iraq aren't a few years old or 15, but 50 or 60. Why is that perspective so rare even among progressives in the US?" Hoberman: "Jarecki's film forcefully argues that the much abused word freedom cannot paper over the conflicts between capitalism and democracy." And more from the Reverse Shot team at indieWIRE and Nick Schager at Slant.
David Edelstein's first review in New York begins: "In Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World, Albert Brooks makes his alter ego ('Albert Brooks') the butt of every joke, which generates big laughs and progressively smaller returns." Related: "Woody Allen may bestride the world like a colossus, but - the brilliance of Real Life, Modern Romance, and Lost in America notwithstanding - not even the French have shown any interest in Albert Brooks." Why, wonders J Hoberman, before hazarding a guess. Meanwhile, Daniel Robert Epstein interviews Brooks for SuicideGirls.
"On a trip back to Senegal, Sembène was struck by or reminded of the high levels of illiteracy. This convinced him to turn to film rather than literature as a means of communicating with wide layers of the population." At WSWS, Joanne Laurier recounts Ousmane Sembène's story before turning to the 1963 short film, Borom Sarret and the 1966 feature, Black Girl.
Richard Linklater on the 20th anniversary of the Austin Film Society in indieWIRE: "Looking back over 20 years, I can say I now feel we were meant to be.... Like in so many areas of life, once you remove the profit motive and just want to make something cool happen because life would simply be better or more fun, it's amazing what you can do and who will jump in and help you do it." More (plus pix) from Blake at Cinema Strikes Back.
Cinematical's Kim Voynar interviews Favela Rising directors Matt Mochary and Jim Zimbalist.
Kirby Dick's This Film Is Not Yet Rated is set to premiere at Sundance and David M Halbfinger has quite a background story on the detective work behind the project, even as he writes, "Mr Dick's one-sided smackdown of a movie wallops the ratings board - the brainchild of Jack Valenti, the longtime head of the Motion Picture Association - every which way but evenhandedly."
Also in the New York Times:
David Thomson has two new pieces in the Independent and one in the NYT. In the first, he revisits HUAC as a way to introduce a recommendation: "To see Force of Evil today is like a cold shower. You can hardly believe the perilous lucidity that is unfolding." In the second, he evaluates the current crop of young male actors. For the NYT Book Review, Thomson writes, "Marshall Fine's Accidental Genius is, really, the first full life of Cassavetes, who died in 1989 at 59 and who is easily offered as a kind of godfather to the independent film movement in America." After an evidently disappointing beginning, "as soon as we get to Shadows, this book jumps to life."
Stanley Kauffmann in the New Republic:
Whatever else can be said about it, Schindler's List is masterfully directed. Every scene, every shot has been conceived with an almost angry simplicity, with a passion for truth that discards both the trite and the clever. I know few other films - and I'm remembering Bergman and Bresson and Antonioni, among others - that more authentically elevate form to the level of content. The very making of Schindler's List incises its subject powerfully.
This is woefully untrue of Munich.
Yossi Melman and Steven Hartov, a reporter for Ha'aretz specializing in Israeli intelligence and the editor-in-chief of the Special Operations Report, respectively, have a different concern: "[W]hat we find disturbing is that it is substantially a fiction - which, given Hollywood's influence, may soon be regarded as a definitive account.... [Spielberg's] conduct in this case resembles that of a cub journalist who chooses to run a great story rather than confuse us with the facts."
Also in the Guardian, Jonathan Gibbs: "There must be a novel, somewhere, mustn't there, that is truly unfilmable?... I nominate as the ultimate unfilmable novel the final part of Beckett's Trilogy: The Unnamed." And Lisa Allardice interviews Sam West.
Jürgen Fauth: "Factotum is hilarious, sobering, and inspiring, often at the same time."
Richard Corliss in Time: "Bubble is, in a few ways, Soderbergh's most radical and invigorating experiment yet."
The cinetrix on Mutual Appreciation: "It continues to astonish me how Andrew manages to capture these moments as he lives them. I suspect it stems from his genuine affection for the friends he casts. That may be why there are no traditional villains in his films - Bujalski's eyes and ears are finely attuned to the ardor and self-destructive urges in everyone."
Acquarello reviews Judith Mayne's Claire Denis.
Grady Hendrix has news of the next feature from Gu Changwei, whose Peacock "was one of the oddest and best movies of 2005." Also: "Zinda [that Bollywood remake of Oldboy, you may remember] was sufficient punishment for any sins I may have committed in a previous life."
At Twitch, The Gomorrahizer has a bit on each of the three projects Takashi Miike's working on.
The Voice's brief reviews and "Tracking Shots": Matt Singer on Last Holiday and Glory Road; Pete L'Official on Tristan & Isolde; Mark Holcomb on End of the Spear; R Emmet Sweeney on 24 Hours on Craigslist; Ben Kenigsberg on Pizza and Drew Tillman on The Keeper: The Legend of Omar Khayyyam.
At MCN, Gary Dretzka looks over the plethora of new ways to watch stuff.
In Slate, Edward Jay Epstein explains the economics behind "the starlet's dilemma in babeland."
Online listening tip #1. Pamela Yates, director of State of Fear, and Ellen Perry, director of Fall of Fujimori, on the Leonard Lopate Show. Reviews: Michael Atkinson in the Voice.
Online listening tip #2. Steve Coogan on Fresh Air.
Online connect-the-dots tip. Hitchcock, Zizek and Iran at Subject Barred. Via k-punk.
Online browsing tip. At Cinematical, Adam Finley collects links to four blogs run by DreamWorks animators.
Online browsing, listening and viewing tip. WFMU lists the latest additions to UbuWeb.
Online viewing tip. The trailer for Idlewild, the Outkast movie, via Fimoculous.
Online viewing tips. Video for the Heavy Ammunition Project. Via Cory Doctorow at Boing Boing, where Mark Frauenfelder points to Cartoon Modern - because Amid Amidi is featuring the work of Victor Haboush all week long.
Posted by dwhudson at 2:44 PM
Towards Sundance.
With half a dozen profiles of New Yorkish films and filmmakers heading to Sundance, all gathered conveniently at one address, The Reeler previews Salvage, Half Nelson, Flannel Pajamas, Hold-Up, Man Push Cart and American Hardcore. Update: The Reeler talks with Hilary Brougher (Stephanie Daley).
Logan Hill looks ahead two more features in New York. "Every year at Sundance, there’s at least one racy sex film. This year, you get seven for the price of one in Destricted." The filmmakers: Matthew Barney, Gaspar Noé, Larry Clark, Richard Prince, Sam Taylor Wood and Marina Abramovic.
And: "[W]hat makes James Longley's Iraq in Fragments so powerful - and why it's likely to be one of the most-heralded films at Sundance - is that he spent enough time there for unpredictable ideas to incubate and shot enough footage to explore them." More from Hannah Eaves.
More filmmaker interviews to catch up with at indieWIRE: Christian Frei (The Giant Buddhas), Ryan Fleck (Half Nelson) and Jocelyne Saab (Kiss Me Not on the Eyes).
Cyndi Greening is gearing up fast for the fest.
The Salt Lake Tribune launches a special Sundance section. Via Anne Thompson.
Posted by dwhudson at 9:56 AM
Fests and events, 1/17.
Kino wie noch nie is an exhibition "to be perceived as a cinematographic laboratory" at the Generali Foundation in Vienna from January 20 through April 23.
The Berlinale unveils this year's International Jury. With Charlotte Rampling presiding, the other jurors are American artist Matthew Barney (IFC will be distributing Drawing Restraint 9, notes Cinematical's Martha Fischer), Indian producer Yash Chopra, Dutch director Marleen Gorris, Polish cinematographer Janusz Kaminski, Korean actress Lee Young-ae, German actor Armin Mueller-Stahl and American producer Fred Roos. Related: Cineuropa reports on the third Berlinale Co-Production Market.
Transmediale06 has announced its Film & Video Program, which runs February 3 through 7 in Berlin, though the Exhibition will remain open through March 19.
The Blowin' Up a Spot Film Festival, "showcasing women of various ethnic and socioeconomic
backgrounds," runs in Austin from April 27 through 30.
Posted by dwhudson at 9:31 AM
Lists, 1/17.
The Hong Kong Film Critics Society has named Johnnie To's Election the best film of 2005, reports the Guardian.
At Cinemarati, Campaspe (who has an excellent entry on Luise Rainer at Self-Styled Siren) passes along a challenge: "Pick ten films (and only ten) that you could use to explain the USA to a foreigner who has never been here." Update: Flickhead's list.
At Hollywood Bitchslap, Scott Weinberg has more than just one top ten: "I thought it'd be fun to go the extra mile and bang out nine more lists, partially because I love to write, but mainly because I'm what you call a Pathetic Movie Geek."
Jeffrey M Anderson selects "ten best unheralded productions of 2005" at Mindjack.
Movie City News has the list of the Online Film Critics Society's awards.
Tim Lucas: "The much-anticipated ballot for the Fourth Annual Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards - recognizing outstanding achievement in genre film, video, and journalism during 2005 - is now posted on the Rondo website."
Posted by dwhudson at 9:05 AM
Globalization.
By now, you've heard the names of the big winners of Golden Globe Awards; the Hollywood Foreign Press Association has the full list, naturally, and a numbers breakdown.
The Los Angeles Times is, of course, very excited, placing a big box showcasing its coverage - which is fairly massive - at The Envelope front and center on its homepage.
The Carpetbagger, spotted in Jeffrey Wells's string of impressions and photos, went celeb-spotting and quips away for the New York Times. Sharon Waxman handles the straight-up story, Cathy Horyn ogles the dresses, Alessandra Stanley rates the show as it played on TV and there are two slide shows: 1, 2.
More reportage from Gregg Kilday in the Hollywood Reporter.
The Guardian's Xan Brooks reminds us that "the relationship between the Globes and the Oscars is not quite as simple as it first appears."
So. With all that out of the way, the other stuff: "Did they get that party started right or what?!? Don't answer that." Josh Horowitz posts the lyrics of show's opening tune.
Cinematical staged a virtual party; if you skipped the show or want to relive all the thrills and spills, only this time with running textual commentary, Karina Longworth has gathered all that live blogging into one link pileup.
One joke was pretty good, thinks Jim Emerson at rogerebert.com; two, though, were especially awful.
George Clooney's comments give Alternet's Evan Derkacz hope for the Oscars.
Updates: Edward Copeland; Troy Patterson at Slate; Alison Willmore at the IFC Blog; Anne Thompson at her Risky Biz Blog; and Gabriel Shanks links to a few more spots where live-blogging was going on.
Posted by dwhudson at 8:35 AM
January 15, 2006
Long weekend shorts.
From January 20 through 26, Film Forum films by and about or in the general neighborhood of Melvin Van Peebles, a fine reason for a fine piece from Greg Tate in the Village Voice: "He continues to be the indomitable, upbeat, energetic workaholic he's always been.... This is especially the case with the new film, a project for which he's yet again done the unthinkable and recorded his audio track first - sound, narration, music, dialogue, the whole megillah - without an investor in sight."
Doug Cummings favorite catch at the Palm Springs International Film Festival this year so far is Alicia Scherson's "magnificent debut film about love and loss in contemporary Santiago," Play.
"As well as providing an extremely rare chance to revisit an example of portmanteau filmmaking that engaged the talents of the directors Jean-Luc Godard, Agnès Varda, Alain Resnais, Claude Lelouch and Chris Marker, the Dutch-born documentarist Joris Ivens and the American photographer William Klein, [Loin du Viêt-Nam] offers a reminder of how muted the opposition to the present war in Iraq has been, by comparison with the chorus of anger that eventually helped to undermine the American government's belligerence," writes Richard Williams.
Also in the Guardian:
"I was on the Observer during the later 1960s, as our senior writers vainly warned the West that Palestinian suffering and desperation would become a spreading cancer," writes Neal Ascherson, who does express some frustration with Munich, but: "It's in pride and love that, through this film, [Spielberg] asks what has become of that ancient Israel which invented righteousness and reverence for law and how long a nation can survive which believes it must take because nothing will be given."
Also, Mark Kermode on Capote and In Cold Blood, on journalistic irresponsibility and the horrific banality of most serial killers. And Nick Greenslade reviews Altman on Altman: "The difficulty facing David Thompson in his interviews with Robert Altman is that the Hollywood director's films are notoriously hard to categorize."
In the wake of a screening of Sátántangó, Waggish scopes out a spot for Béla Tarr: "Tarr is too often compared to Tarkovsky, when the two are almost polar opposites, and not just in their view of humanity.... There is a bit of Bresson in the tableaux, but the influence of (late) Carl Dreyer is more apparent in their lack of flash.... But the decentralization of the people from these scenes comes from another source entirely: Antonioni." Via Zach Campbell.
One of the reasons movies are longer these days, suggests Dave Kehr, is the ease with which editing digitally makes it possible to drop all sorts of shots into scenes: "Paradoxically, an increased running time seems to require an increased agitation within scenes - a barrage of often pointless shots that exist, not to convey information, but to physically stimulate the spectator's nerve endings - producing violent, exaggerated rhythms, serving up a psychedelic flood of colors and textures that are often optically exciting but intellectually and emotionally vacant."
Mike Hale assures New York Times readers that some anime series are actually pretty good. And Charles Solomon scans Twitch readers' reactions to the news that Hayao Miyazaki's son, Goro, will be directing Studio Ghibli's adaptation of Ursula K LeGuin's A Wizard of Earthsea.
Also: To accompany an awards season slide show depicting Ralph Fiennes wearing his trousers rolled (but not necessarily growing old), Lynn Hirschberg talks to the actor about clothes.
Sundance interviews to catch up with at indieWIRE: Andrucha Waddington (The House of Sand) and Joseph Mathew (Crossing Arizona).
Christopher Campbell at Cinematical: "It took me three invites over a few months before I decided to attend a screening for On the Outs, mainly because I expected a cheap, badly acted and preachy little film, and then I only went because it was feeling like a squeaky wheel sounds. Well, it got my oil in the form of respect and praise. Hopefully you won't need me to tell you three times to see it."
Nathan Kosub in Stop Smiling on 2046: "Wong's picture is the perfect counterpoint to Linklater's [Before Sunset]: no two directors so clearly differentiate memory from time, time from memory."
Ray Pride's roundup at Movie City News: "Match Point, Munich, Caché, Innocence, Runin, and conversations with Marc Levin about The Protocols of Zion and Richard Shepard about the giddy, profane Matador."
Mike Russell: "Okay. So The Matador doesn't work. But I'm actually embarrassed for Hoodwinked."
For Jeffrey Wells, Down to the Bone is "a profoundly honed and life-like low-budgeter about a mom with two kids coping with drug addiction, and Vera Farmiga, who plays this withered young woman like she's not playing her at all, is the absolute shit."
Berlinale press release: "The first films in the Perspektive Deutsches Kino programme are a surprise package of recent German cinema: they include Franka Potente's directorial debut, a silent film, road movies and melodramas taken straight from life, and a documentary film about a distant world that is still so near."
"Despite studio attempts to prevent leaks online this year, and the threat of jail time and steep fines for movie pirates, at least four screeners are on file-sharing networks already." In Slate, Xeni Jardin reveals how those who leaked them might be caught - even though some 'xperts believe the studios still might have trouble arguing a case against them. For accompanying images, see Boing Boing.
"What happens when theory finds itself outwitted by cultural objects themselves?" asks Nick Rombes. "McSweeney's, no 11 (2003; edited by Dave Eggers) includes a DVD whose contents are made up entirely of deleted, extra-deleted, behind the scenes of deleted scenes, and outtakes from the deleted scenes..."
For PopMatters, Roger Holland reviews the latest DVDs aimed at kids.
New York's Pioneer Theater might get a bit rowdy next month. Andrew WK will present Andrew WK: Who Knows? on February 3 and 4 and Malcolm McDowell will present Evilenko on February 6.
Online listening tip #1. Werner Herzog is a guest on Fresh Air. Related: Vince Keenan, who found Grizzly Man "the most dense film I've seen in ages," would disapprove, but all the kids are clicking it, so you can't be left in the dark: Grizzly Bear Man, a spoof from Travis and Jonathan.
Online listening tips #2 and #3. On DVD Talk Radio, Geoffrey Kleinman talks with Alex Gibney, director of Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room and Craig Brewer, director of Hustle & Flow.
Posted by dwhudson at 8:12 AM
Bloggish, 1/15.
IndieWIRE has launched a Park City blog, where filmmakers with works screening at Sundance and, hopefully, Slamdance, too, will be checking in. So far, there are nine confirmed contributors. Sujewa Ekanayake has fired up yet another blog, this one called Art Indie Film Venues USA, where he'll be tracking screenings of true indies coast to coast.
And then there's this incredible online browsing, lingering, let's-get-lost tip from Sean Spillane at Bitter Cinema, just perfect for a long weekend: Greenbriar Picture Shows, "a wonderful new blog that specializes in presenting publicity stills, art and press books." John McElwee calls it "A Site Dedicated to the Great Days of Movie Exhibition." Now more than ever.
Posted by dwhudson at 6:38 AM
| Comments (2)
Adaptations, 1/15.
Via Todd at Twitch: Europeanfilms.net is hosting the trailer for Elementarteilchen, Oskar Roehler's adaptation of Michel Houellebecq's The Elementary Particles with Franka Potente, Moritz Bleibtreu and a host of other German stars, set to premiere in competition at the Berlinale.
There's a possible sneak peek at the screenplay for Christopher Nolan's The Prestige, an adaptation of Christopher Priest's novel with Hugh Jackman, Christian Bale and David Bowie, at AICN. Via Martha Fischer at Cinematical.
So far, James Ellroy is very pleased indeed with Brian De Palma's adaptation of his novel, The Black Dahlia, reports Matt Zoller Seitz.
Posted by dwhudson at 6:10 AM
January 14, 2006
Shelley Winters, 1920 - 2006.
Shelley Winters, who once described her life as a 'rocky road out of the Brooklyn ghetto to one New York apartment, two Oscars, three California houses, four hit plays, five Impressionist paintings, six mink coats and 99 films,' died yesterday. She was 83, although some sources says she was 85.
[...]
Tough-talking and oozing sex appeal, Ms Winters was blowzy, vulgar and often pathetically vulnerable in her early films. In movie after movie, she played working-class women who were violently discarded by men who had used them.... Even when she became the dominating force in many of her later movies, Ms Winters often played vulnerable monsters.... Off screen Ms Winters lived with an equal gusto.
Aljean Harmetz in the New York Times.
Updates through 1/17 below.
[W]hat first comes to my mind is the part she played in Pete's Dragon. That was one of the first movies I ever saw in a theatre. I loved it.... Man, she was a nasty piece of work in that movie.
Jeffrey Overstreet.
For some strange reason [her star in Hollywood is] on Vine Street, with Charles Laughton and Melvyn Douglas. I think all the liberal Democrats are on Vine Street. I think the Chamber of Commerce... (laughs) they put us on Vine Street.
[...]
99 percent is doing work you love. That's 99 percent of life. The people who can make a living doing what they love are indeed the fortunate of the earth.
Shelley Winters, interviewed by Harry Governick in September, 1992.
Updates: Edward Copeland and Josh R remember notable performances.
And it's good to hear that voice again in Allison Keyes's report for NPR.
Update: Campaspe: "She was an utterly fearless actress... They tried to turn her into a glamor girl, and she didn't give a damn. She wanted to act."
Updates, 1/17: Guy Flatley's 1971 interview and Veronica Horwell in the Guardian.
Posted by dwhudson at 12:21 PM
| Comments (1)
Weekend lists.
The Cinemarati countdown is complete. Along with ten best performances and ten best directors, the Cinemarati have put Good Night, and Good Luck at #3 (MaryAnn Johanson explains), A History of Violence at #2 (Brian Darr explains; shimes dissents) and, at #1: Brokeback Mountain.
Bryant Frazer explains: "It's simply expert, big-hearted filmmaking in the grand tradition." Nick Davis dissents: "Audiences are invited at every turn to project a depth of passion and tragic romance that [Ang] Lee simply never substantiates."
Another list at Hollywood Bitchslap: Greg Ursic's annotated ten is in alphabetical order. Also: Chris Parry talks to Brian Raftery, who's written up Giant Magazine's list of the 50 greatest soundtracks of all time.
Updates: Matt Clayfield: "Unable to come up with any original ideas of my own, I'm stealing this one from Acquarello, whose recent pillow list of one hundred titles, 'like a pillow book entry, describes a temporal point of convergence - the films that are meaningful to me at this juncture - each a memory, a mnemonic, a biography, a resonance... to be taken with a grain of salt.' The same applies to my list."
"Chiming in a few weeks late on some favorite films of last year": Wendy Mitchell.
Posted by dwhudson at 11:56 AM
LAT. Sneaks 2006.
While the New York Times takes one last long look back at 2005, the Los Angeles Times looks ahead to the year already underway. If you've really got a lot of time on your hands this long weekend, you can click through 51 photos in the gallery; other might want to head straight for the 18 shots from the Australian set of Superman Returns, most likely taken when Geoff Boucher was there nabbing quotes for his long piece on the summer hopeful.
After noting that Sony has high, high hopes for The Da Vinci Code, Elena Howe and John Horn list the "plenty of other white-hot movies headed to screens this year." That opens things up for the big annotated lists of 2006 releases sorted by genre: comedy, animation, horror, drama, documentary, thriller, musical, action and adventure.
Elena Howe presents "a look at the genesis of some of the sequels planned for the year," that is, how the original scored at the box office and the logic behind giving it another go.
Susan King is busy in this edition, offering summaries of what we might expect from A Scanner Darkly, The Break Up, Poseidon and Cars, while Elaine Dutka does the same for Eight Below.
Bryce Dallas Howard has three movies coming out this year, so Mimi Avins meets her, presumably over a cup of tea.
Posted by dwhudson at 8:11 AM
NYT. Red Carpet.
The Carpetbagger suddenly has a lot of company as the New York Times runs another walloping weekend package, this one geared toward the Oscars. One nifty idea brings out the best in each of the paper's three critics as they write up "The Unforgettable Moment."
Posted by dwhudson at 7:16 AM
January 13, 2006
Shorts, 1/13.
The RES newsletter teases, promising that the January/February issue, out next week, will tell the story of the making of Richard Linklater's A Scanner Darkly.
The January issue of fps, the "Magazine of Animation," is available now, though, which is to say, the handsome preview is free and you may well be tempted to splurge all of 99 cents for the full issue in all its PDF splendor.
Doug Cummings reviews four more films he's seen in Palm Springs, including Richard Dembo's The House of Nina with Agnès Jaoui.
Sujewa Ekanayake has not only enjoyed The Proper Care & Feeding of an American Messiah, he's also noted that Kelley Baker, the Angry Filmmaker, is touring the US and Europe and, inspired by recent events, written up a list of "4 films that were inspired by the war in Sri Lanka."
For SuicideGirls, Daniel Robert Epstein interviews Kent Williams, who's illustrated (and somewhat adapted) Darren Aronofsky's screenplay for The Fountain.
Big fans of V for Vendetta: David Poland and Jeffrey Wells. Related: Peter Wilkinson in Rolling Stone on "The Mystery of Larry Wachowski," via Anne Thompson.
X at Twitch: "It took 11 years, but they're finally back: Director Zhang Yimou and Gong Li will work together again."
Zach Campbell: "Cinema has given us the world in a coffee cup (Godard) and an ashtray (Brakhage)."
"These will not be films 'about' something, but films that 'run into' something." The Bernadette Corporation's Pedestrian Cinema, via Greg Allen who assesses the results so far.
"There's a reason [Michael] Haneke was named best director at Cannes, why Caché got a prominent slot in the most recent New York Film Festival, why at the end of 2005 various critics' groups and the European Film Awards cited Caché as the year's best picture," writes Stuart Klawans in the Nation. "There's also a reason to resist Caché - but to propose it, I'll need to conduct a quick review of Haneke's career."
Related: Benjamin Secher interviews Haneke. Also in the Telegraph: David Gritten visits Peter O'Toole on the set of Venus and Jasper Rees basks in the luxury of the Rex Cinema.
Jonathan Rosenbaum in the Chicago Reader: "Some critics are saying that Match Point is essentially a remake of Allen's 1989 Crimes and Misdemeanors. There's obviously some connection, but having just seen these movies back-to-back, I find the differences more striking than the similarities."
"Arab cinema has yet to acquire a strong sense of identity, both for itself and in the eyes of international audiences," writes Sheila Johnston, though that of course can be taken as a healthy sign of its diversity. Also in the Independent: Robert Sellers talks with Neil Jordan about Breakfast on Pluto.
Jonathan Freedland on Munich: "[L]ook, it says, Israel is not some brute military power, but a country of real, morally conflicted human beings. This is a contribution several doveish Israeli artists - like the novelists Amos Oz and David Grossman - have made to their country before: by revealing Israel's internal dissent, they show their nation in its best light."
Also in the Guardian: Hordes of British comedians are storming the screens, notes Jon Bentham, who wonders if that's a good thing. Relax: it is. And John Patterson looks back and sighs, "The world of the old Katharine Graham Washington Post, and of the New York Times in its Pentagon Papers glory years, is gone forever... Back in 1976, All the President's Men was a eulogy for something that was already passing away, while Network was showing us all the things to come."
The indieWIRE Sundance interviews roll on: Nick Francis on his and Marc Francis's Black Gold and Paul Fitzgerald on his Forgiven.
Signandsight translates the Gerhard Midding interview with Patrice Chéreau mentioned yesterday.
For the LA CityBeat's Andy Klein, After Innocence isn't particularly artsy, but it's effective. Also: Criterion's release of Shoot the Piano Player is "first-rate."
Movies are too damn long these days, complains Caryn James. To the reviews in the New York Times:
Programs for the Berlinale's Kinderfilmfest and 14plus are set. The site's also featuring an interview with section head Thomas Hailer.
Will the Twin Cities' only repertory theater shut down? Paul Demko looks into it at Culture to Go.
For Slate, Paul Boutin picks out the highlights of the Consumer Electronics Show.
Carroll Ballard will be on hand at the Balboa Theater in San Francisco for two afternoon showings of Duma tomorrow.
Online browsing and viewing tip. Vasulka.org. Via the DVblog.
Online listening tip. Mark Romanek's keynote address at Resfest in LA. Via Ben at the Whine Colored Sea.
Posted by dwhudson at 8:04 AM
Lists, 1/13.
"I'll admit to being drawn to the idea of a Sei Shônagon-styled pillow book as a means of capturing passing thoughts that would otherwise be lost." Acquarello lists one hundred "films that are meaningful to me at this juncture - each a memory, a mnemonic, a biography, a resonance."
More than a list, Erik Childress's "Best and Worst of 2005" at Hollywood Bitchslap is a survey.
Critics of Central Ohio have spoken. Mark Pfeiffer's got the results.
At Gladsome Morning, John has what basically amounts to a top five. But "to compensate for the shorter list, I'd like to offer a list of older films I've seen for the first time, all of which surpass virtually everything new I've seen this year."
Posted by dwhudson at 7:15 AM
January 12, 2006
Shorts, 1/12.
Michael Glawogger's Workingman's Death is subtitled Five Portraits of Work in the 21st Century. "Each episode comes with its own unique, vivid sense of place, of colour, sound and even of smell," writes Carolyn Nikodym, who calls Glawogger for Vue Weekly. He tells her he'll be expanding the Nigeria segment for the DVD, "And with this film, I have the feeling that people are astonished, sometimes, what the world looks like - that they think that I go to extremes. But what I show is not so extreme - the world looks like that a lot of the time. If that’s understood, then I would be happy."
In the new issue of Mute, Stewart Home defends Melvin Van Peebles seminal 1970 Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song from attacks from all quarters, including those close to, well, home: "There are, of course, purists who will bemoan the fact that the BFI are 'recuperating' revolutionary culture... I see the BFI attempting to absorb Sweetback into the institution of art as a progressive step from a proletarian perspective, since it results in the bourgeoisie having to address some of its own contradictions and limits."
Right at Your Door, premiering at Sundance, will present a grand scale catastrophe on a small budget. David M Halbfinger meets accomplished production designer and first-time director Chris Gorak: "In his bleak envisioning of a day in Los Angeles that begins like any other, bombs go off downtown, in Beverly Hills and at the airport; countless people are killed as toxic ash carrying a deadly virus falls like snowflakes; the air becomes unbreathable; thousands are driven from their homes; confusion and misinformation reign; and ordinary citizens are victimized not just by the unseen terrorists but also by their own overwhelmed and unprepared government."
Also in the New York Times, Manohla Dargis: "In [Béla Tarr's] Sátántangó, life is beautiful and grotesque by turns, and never less than mesmerizing." More from J Hoberman in the Village Voice: "Despair has never been more voluptuously precise. Sátántangó has cast its spell on cineastes as varied as the late Susan Sontag and the rejuvenated Gus Van Sant. If you have a day to devote to it, the same might happen to you."
And Jeannette Catsoulis: "Moving from the breathtaking beauty of the Peruvian Andes to the graceful sweep of coastal Lima, Pamela Yates's harrowing documentary State of Fear chronicles 20 years of terror, brutality and repression." More from Michael Atkinson in the Voice, Scott Tobias in the AV Club and Andrew O'Hehir in Salon.
At Alternet, Onnesha Roychoudhuri talks with Purpose Films co-founder Nick Bicanic about Shadow Company, a doc that explores the alarmingly rapid rise of private military contract employees (mercenaries, more or less) in contemporary warfare.
J Hoberman: "Revisited today, Billy Wilder's 1961 farce One, Two, Three is a Cold War poltergeist, rattling chains in the vanished spook house that was West Berlin." The film "celebrates as it satirizes American cultural imperialism."
Also in the Voice:
Another columnist debuts at PopMatters: Dante A Ciampaglia looks back at "one of the most acerbic [films] to ever come out of Hollywood," Sweet Smell of Success. It's also "one of the most noted films highlighted by filmmakers as being a primary influence on their work. Barry Levinson, Paul Thomas Anderson, Scorsese — they've all referenced or "quoted" the film in their efforts."
Also: Bill Gibron on what actor Giuseppe Andrews has been up to over the past few years: "In order to pass the time and explore his burgeoning interest in filmmaking, Andrews decided to get a camera and cast his fellow trailer park residents in a series of experimental narratives. The results have been nothing short of monumental, the kind of cinematic shockwave that is destined to be ignored by the current pop culture mindset, but praised a few decades from now."
David Poland maps Munich, "sequence by sequence... In the process of doing this, a lot of the detail work becomes clearer."
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price director Robert Greenwald at the Huffington Post: "You would think by now that Lee Scott, the $13-million-a-year failed CEO of Wal-Mart, would know better than to send confidential memos to his employees, many of whom are happy to share them with those fighting Wal-Mart." Via Craig Phillips.
This Divided State "deserves to be a part of the ongoing conversation about politics, popular culture, and polarization," writes Chuck Tryon.
Ed Champion: "I like the idea behind Wolphin, which involves collecting a good deal of film shorts and assorted narratives that don't really have a place outside of their initial small venues. But unfortunately, like almost anything that comes from the McSweeney's Empire, the DVD carries the uncomfortable stamp of films that are just too safe to be innovative." Speaking of, and via Eugene Hernandez, Chris McCoy: "A Selection from George W Bush's Eavesdropping Tapes: Matthew Barney and Björk Place an Ikea Phone Order."
"Excerpted in Following Sean, [Ralph Arlyck's 1969 short, Sean] is still a remarkable document nearly 40 years later," writes Cheryl Eddy in the San Francisco Bay Guardian. "At the time it made even nonsquares worry about what would happen to the flower children's children when they grew up, and it's not hard to see why." More from Mark T at Scene and Unseen. Also, Glory Road.
Matthew Wilder: "Malick is the first artist in movies who has managed to translate Whitman's ecstasy - the bliss of connectedness to all creatures and things - into sound, music, and images." Also in the City Pages: Caroline Palmer on Ballets Russes, "an invaluable record."
Matt Clayfield: "For me, the film can be more or less situated on the same continuum as films like Me and You and Everyone We Know, The Virgin Suicides, and those of David Gordon Green - it's a slight, quotidian drama, almost fragile, almost breakable - only I don't like any of those films and yet adore Funny Ha Ha. What's the go?" More from John at Gladsome Morning.
The WSWS's 