March 8, 2011
TRUE/FALSE '11: Critic's Notebook
by Vadim Rizov
That tradition isn't necessarily the kind of hybridized, artful documentaries Dennis Lim wrote about recently. Despite its presence at the True/False Film Festival in Columbia, MO this year (a fest devoted solely to documentaries, which just finished its eighth annual run; this was my second time attending), director Oliver Laxe cautioned during an introduction that everything here is, in fact, false. Laxe's film was mentioned in Lim's piece, as was Abbas Kiarostami, whose frequently exposes its own artifice. Taste of Cherry ends by exposing the set, and all of Close-Up plays with overtly blurring the line between reenactment, staged reality and actual trial footage.
Laxe toys around with these elements, but his affinity with Kiarostami has less to do with the structural ambiguities than the way he films children: as curious and bright but often stubborn or recalcitrant. Early on, workshop director "Laxe" tries to lecture them about the way images are transmitted through lenses. The discussion goes over their heads, and Laxe sets about staging their lives without telling them what his broader goal is. Later on, the kids complain that what Laxe is shooting "isn't even a movie." It's just a collection of scenes, "without any story." "You cannot make a movie like that," one scores. It's a funny scene, but also a sly way of calling out real critics who actually complain about this children (like the trade reporters from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, who panned this film by basically saying they were bored).
After Laxe leaves, the children go to the country to film what they'd like to see themselves: nature, with a particular emphasis on swaying fields in the wind and olive trees. This is firm formalism in the vein of Kiarostami's long, serene nature shots and penchant for watching cars drive over landscapes for extended periods of time, and an interest in rural poetry similar to the soothing jungle landscapes of Apichatpong Weerasethakul. With "Laxe" as director's negativity omitted—he has the children stage a chicken-stealing scene—the troubled refugee kids find moments of grace.
It sounds awfully heavy-handed—it's hard to describe without sounding overwrought—but it's a really soothing experience, for audience as well as the children, a riff on like-minded filmmakers' more ambient moments. The first half (playful without being grating) sets up an argument for what the film becomes: a series of mostly plotless incidents, a slightly different way of looking at narrative and the natural world that ends up surprisingly uplifting without overtly accomplishing anything. Laxe has referred to his presence in the film as portraying a "neocolonial" director, and the question of how a European director can depict or mediate the depiction of Moroccan children figures into the mix. The politics, though, exist at a sublimated level, the film eventually escaping those kinds of concerns to momentarily release you from those fears.
Recruit Alexei looks on warily—"you have a gaze just like a little fox," one of the men tells him—and eventually learns to hold his own: after spending 36 hours in an ad hoc snow cave for a hazing initiation, he's just grateful to be inside again. Early on, things are rough, with angry demands to do the wake-up drill one more time, but eventually Alexei proves his physical worth enough times to be accepted. Not that the timed obstacle-course runs are necessary: there's nothing to defend against out here except bears.
Marczak seems more amused than alarmed by all this, which makes a difference: his film is a portrait of old-school nationalists acting boorishly that doesn't take itself too seriously, wry fun trumping tragedy. With Vladimir Putin's photo prominently displayed in the background and many hypothetical discussions about how to fight/disarm a border transgressor, the point about Russia's frequent antagonism/chauvinist treatment of immigrants, foreigners and citizens of their former satellite republics is made lightly rather than polemically. (Since shorts get so little press coverage, a shout-out here to Chase Whiteside and Erik Stoll's Lifelike, a hypnotic, mostly silent and admirably gruesome depiction of taxidermy from gutting to the final oddly convincing mounted dear-head, an appropriately macho-but-distanced prelude to the feature.)
Though Brian doesn't seem to perceive any of his own problems, even he can see trouble coming when he falls for Kaitlin, a super-pretty Columbia student who starts dropping evangelical dogma into her social counseling class papers. His solution is to divorce Rose (while still living with her) and then marry and move in with Caitlin, while still doing his ministerial work with the two. Ruthlessly un-self-aware of how badly he behaves, Brian blunders through this film resolutely unfazed. Up to the last scene, he's still hustling, scrounging up donations to buy more tracts telling unbelievers they're going to hell. He's consistently the least sympathetic but compelling documentary profile subject in recent memory.
First-time director Dennis W. Ho breaks up the high drama with very nicely framed static shots of New York's many subway stations, conveying the daily reality and feeling of these regularly overcrowded, brutally utilitarian-looking stations. The core of the film, though, is unambiguous vérité; the result is strong, sometimes cringe-inducing drama. Subway Preacher puts you in the headspace of a devout former bowling champ/porn addict who now conceives of himself as a model of Godly living despite all evidence to the contrary, which proves a grimly enlightening experience.
Posted by ahillis at March 8, 2011 3:11 PM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email