November 21, 2008
Les 100.
Writing for the Independent, John Lichfield is naturally a little rattled by Cahiers du cinéma's latest list of the best 100 films ever made: "Most are American. Many of them are French. None are British. There are German, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Swedish, Indian and Japanese films on the list established by Les Cahiers du Cinema but not a single film made in Britain since the cinema industry began just more than a century ago." Cahiers editor Jean-Michel Frodon "said that the absence of British-made movies was 'striking' but not deliberate. 'It does not reflect an anti-British bias. It is simply the result of the individual choices of 76 people in the French industry.'"
The Telegraph is frustrated as well.
At any rate, a festival celebrating the top 100 opened Wednesday in Paris and runs through July 6. For the rest of us, there are plenty of trailers and clips.
Posted by dwhudson at November 21, 2008 7:11 AM
Considering the absence of any Latin American films not made by Bunuel, any Indian films not made by S. Ray, any Japanese films not made by Ozu, Mizoguchi and Kurosawa and any east Asian films made outside Japan, there's a lot to complain about it here ( as well as one or two things to cheer, like Pialat making the cut). I bet the individual ballots were a lot more interesting.
Posted by: Steve at November 21, 2008 2:23 PMThe Cahiers list is in some ways awesome - a list full of magical masterpieces from the classical age of film making.
But in other ways…
All discussion, from understandably wailing British critics, is about leaving British filmmakers off the list. Hey: THE RED SHOES is a classic.
But let me be the first film historian in the world to note:
No woman directors.
No black directors.
No directors of color from Western countries (I’m thrilled that Ray and the Japanese Big Three are there, of course).
The only person of color in a non-Asian movie: HIROSHIMA MON AMOUR. (OK, we have Peter Sellers in brownface in THE PARTY).
Only Jewish characters: Manhattan, once upon a time in america.
No openly gay characters. (Not even my beloved Fante and Mingo from THE BIG COMBO).
No films with black characters.
They are doing better with the disabled: RIO BRAVO favors the immortal Stumpy! (Howard Hawks really “gets it” about the disabled having value.)
Cinephile film culture is not “inclusive”, it is very unwelcoming to The Other. Lists like this seem designed to make every minority person in the world feel bad about themselves, left out, not wanted, second class, human garbage.
The Cahiers list is an example of what a serious problem the cinephile community has.
It just does not recognize the contributions of women and blacks, and wants gays to be invisible.
I’m not interested in labeling people. I do not want to put labels on the 76 French film experts who made up this list. Probably, they are all decent, respectable human beings. But one suspects, they are somehow caught up in cultural forces that cause The Other to become obscure. They don’t mean to do it - but they are caught up in cultural forces, that like a fish not seeing water in a goldfish bowl, make them unaware of minorities around them.
I AM interested in fixing this problem. What can be done to change things?
I have to speak up. I have to walk a fine line between saying mean, nasty things to people - which accomplishes nothing. And pretending that there is not a serious huge problem in the film critic community.







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email