April 11, 2008
Docs, 4/11.
Via Chris Barsanti, Ivan Oransky introduces a Scientific American package on Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Ben Stein's "Michael Moore-style documentary confronting a contemporary scientific status quo that harbors a zero-tolerance policy for the theory of intelligent design in scientific research and American classrooms," as Bruce Bennett puts it in the New York Sun. As you'd imagine, SA isn't nearly as sympathetic. Oransky notes that Michael Shermer is "dumbfounded by the movie's dishonesty," while John Rennie argues "that the movie's attempts to link the theory of evolution to the Holocaust are shameful." And there's a podcast, too.
Errol Morris picks up where he left off; much of his new entry, "Play It Again, Sam (Re-enactments, Part Two)," is a conversation with "Dan Levin, a professor of psychology at Vanderbilt University, who has been involved in various studies of continuity errors in film and otherwise."
Related: Ron Rosenbaum in Slate: "Slo-mo is virtually the standard operating speed of Standard Operating Procedure. I think there's a reason (and a revelation) inherent in its use, which I'll get to. But first let me talk about why I find slo-mo so seductive in the first place."
Bulletproof Salesman "introduces us to Fidelis Cloer, a war profiteer who sells armored cars to diplomats, journalists, and others working in Iraq," writes Chuck Tryon. "Bulletproof Salesman, like [Michael] Tucker and [Petra] Epperlein's two previous documentaries on the Iraq War, Gunner Palace and The Prisoner Or: How I Planned to Kill Tony Blair, avoids any simple political positions, instead choosing to introduce us to one face of a man who profits off of war. The film works, in part, because Cloer is a natural salesman, selling himself just as quickly as he sells bulletproof cars and vests, as well as other safety devices. In fact, as Variety reviewer Joe Leydon observes, there is an extent to which Cloer seems like he would be a charming dinner guest until you develop a full understanding of his occupation and its dependence on the continuation of the war, or perhaps of war in general."
In the New York Times:
Posted by dwhudson at April 11, 2008 1:29 PM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email