February 24, 2008
Shorts, 2/24.
"As with Ten Skies and 13 Lakes before it, James Benning's new film RR forms great ideas and unexpectedly voluptuous beauty out of modest and strict means, content, and style," writes Daniel Kasman in the Auteurs' Notebook.
Also: "I'm not sure [J'entends plus la guitare (I Can No Longer Hear the Guitar)] is any more or less distinguishable from Garrel's other films, or more or less personal. Instead, it is another Philippe Garrel film, which may already say it all—or, at least, say enough. In other words, a masterpiece much like the rest."
Filmbrain recounts the struggle to get into a screening of Brad Anderson's Transsiberian at the Berlinale. Turns out it was worth it, since the film "is a brilliant genre exercise in white-knuckle tension and suspense that avoids the grand third-act set piece that has become practically obligatory these days."
Jesse McKinley profiles NBA superstar and movie producer Baron Davis. Stacy Peralta tells him that Davis was crucial to realizing Made in America, Peralta's doc about gangs in Los Angeles. "Davis acted as a liaison to the neighborhoods where a white, 50-something ex-skater like Mr Peralta might not be exactly welcomed with open arms, especially when bearing a camera."
Also in the New York Times:
Some of Jean-Dominique Bauby's friends are not happy with the liberties taken in the telling of the now-famous story in The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. Beth Arnold talks with them for Salon. Related: Andrew Gumbel profiles Julian Schnabel for the Independent.
Which is where James Mottram talks with Brian De Palma.
United Artists won't turn 90 until next January, but it's celebrating now. David Thomson tells the story behind the studio. Also in the Guardian: Ronald Bergan remembers cinematographer Edward Klosinski.
And: "The names of directors Richard Lester, Ken Russell and Tony Richardson conjure up a time, in the 1960s and early 70s, when British films were refreshing, lively and innovative. The Oscar-winning cinematographer David Watkin, who has died of prostate cancer aged 82, made almost as much of a contribution to this rich period as they did, particularly on the eight films he shot for Lester."
Cinematical's Kim Voynar talks with No End in Sight director Charles Ferguson.
Lynn Barber meets Anita Pallenberg for the Observer. "I am officially here to talk about Anita's role in a film called Mister Lonely directed by Harmony Korine." But of course, the Stones aren't exactly going to go unmentioned.
FilmInFocus is running a bit from Peter Cowie's 2006 talk with Jeanne Moreau.
Online listening tip. Rob Davis talks with Mike White about Year of the Dog and with Marjane Satrapi about Persepolis.
Online viewing tip. David Edelstein and Alex Gibney discuss Taxi to the Dark Side on Bloggerheads.tv.
Posted by dwhudson at February 24, 2008 2:34 PM
in that richard woodward piece i'm not really on board with his writer-director argument but the first three paragraphs of criticism of there will be blood are spot-on.
Posted by: cynthia at February 25, 2008 6:59 AMI remember your entry on Blood, Cynthia, and of course, I respect your take on the film. I'm just wondering - if you had a chance to see it a second time, would you? I hope so. I've heard from more than one or two people that it didn't really open up for them until the second or third time around.
Posted by: David Hudson at February 25, 2008 7:12 AMi don't think so, the experience of watching it was pretty rough. not because i hate the director so much, just because there is absolutely no heart in it to hang onto. i think in some ways no country for old men is guilty of some of the same things i and others charge against blood, but it at least has heart. even if the heart loses in the end.
Posted by: cynthia at February 25, 2008 7:38 AMFair enough. If you're game, though, I'd like to place a bet: that in ten years' time, you'll have felt obligated at some point between now and then to see it one more time. Not that a second viewing would change your opinion or anything; only that it'll be too highly regarded to ignore.
Of course, I could be wrong. By then, we might all collectively decide that we were hoodwinked back in 2007/08... but I really don't think so.
Posted by: David Hudson at February 25, 2008 8:03 AMok let's talk in 10 years. :)
Posted by: cynthia at February 25, 2008 8:29 AMConsider it iCal'd. [grin]
Posted by: David Hudson at February 25, 2008 8:36 AMI've seen TWBB twice, just to make sure that the last 25 min. (1927) were as bad as I thought they were, and they were. Up until the marriage of HW and Mary I was in accord with everyone else about the movie, i.e., Classic, Masterpiece, PTA is a genius, and then...As a matter of fact, I think the movie, because of that last campy, soap opera-ish ending, is not going to be treated kindly. I think the two movies from this year, at least the two "Hollywood" movies, that are going to age the best are Zodiac and Margot at the Wedding, the former which was, to me at least, the best movie of the year, and the latter, the best script of the year.
Posted by: CD at February 25, 2008 9:13 AMI don't understand your criticism of the ending, CD. As far as I can tell, it follows convincingly out of everything that went before. If the final confrontation is "campy, soap opera-ish," then what about the beating by the reservoir, Eli attacking Abel, the baptism scene, the napkin scene, and so forth? Is it the violence that takes you aback? That's been telegraphed all throughout the movie, starting with the title. Yes, it's shocking and disorienting -- on my first viewing, I had lost track of time and expected a whole 'nother act -- but in retrospect, everything that happens strikes me as inevitable.
As for the heart, Cynthia -- I had the exact opposite reaction. No Country struck me as empty exercise in style (and machismo). There Will Be Blood, chronicling the life of somebody who slowly loses his soul, moved me much more.
Posted by: Jürgen at February 25, 2008 12:07 PM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email