March 14, 2007

Rendez-Vous. 12.

The Valet James Van Maanen files a final dispatch from the Rendez-Vous with French Cinema series.

In his charming introduction to The Valet (La Doublure) and its director Francis Veber, the Film Society of Lincoln Center's Richard Pena reminded us of what the late New York Times drama critic Walter Kerr once said about a certain kind of French comedy - which reminded him of a funny watch. That is to say: the movement of the timepiece is so perfectly put together that, once wound, it sets you to laughing. Pena then introduced Veber, the dapper little man responsible for writing some 39 films, 11 of which he's also directed - one of these (Les Fugitifs) he wrote and directed again as an American remake (Three Fugitives, with Nick Nolte and Martin Short). He's also given us Le Jouet, La Chevre, Les Compères, Le Diner de Cons and Le Placard.

In his own brief introduction to his film, Veber kept returning again and again to how marvelously tall, beautiful and talented its leading lady, Alice Taglioni, is. He managed to mention the rest of the cast - including the likes of Daniel Auteuil, Kristin Scott Thomas, Richard Berry, Virginie Ledoyen, Michel Aumont and, in the title role, Gad Elmaleh - almost as an afterthought. Clearly, this Alice puts him in Wonderland. Once the film began, two things were almost immediately apparent: Miss Taglioni is indeed tall, beautiful and talented (she pretty much walks away with the movie) and, yes, this is another of those watches that makes you laugh. To carry the Pena/Kerr metaphor further, this watch, instead of having the usual metal plate covering its movement, has a transparent cover that allows you to observe quite clearly how the timepiece works.

I've enjoyed this novelty on occasion when viewing a watch, but as far as my movies are concerned, I prefer not having to see how all the gears mesh. And mesh, they do, perhaps most perfectly in the scene in which Scott-Thomas, as the wronged wife, makes an early morning call on the title character. The scene is short and sweet: click-click-click go those gears, and we laugh, even as our breath is taken away by the sheer, swift brilliance of the execution. After a while, though, we become a bit too cognizant of the machine itself. Which leaves us with the writing (okay to good) and the performances, most of which are relatively one-note yet played-well. Auteuil is frustrated, Scott-Thomas imperious, Aumont self-involved, Ledoyen sweetly confused, and moon-faced Elmaleh utterly passive. All of which puts the burden squarely on the shoulders of Taglioni, who single-handedly creates a new stereotype: the supermodel with a heart of gold (Naomi Campbell, are you taking notes?).

Foreign film aficionados here in the US may be familiar with Ms Taglioni's work in films such as Grande École, Sky Fighters (Les Chevaliers du Ciel) and Jet Lag (Decalage Horaire; if not, all three are available on DVD.) Here she is as stunning as ever, with the added fillip of seeming to be perhaps the only character possessing enough sense of herself and her place in the world (and this movie) to relax, kick back and have fun. She is marvelous, and I can fully understand why M Veber is so enamored.

Before The Valet began, audience members in the row behind me were having an interesting conversation about the series in general and in particular why a film such as this would be included, since the writer/director makes such "old-fashioned movies and this festival is supposed to be cutting edge" - to paraphrase the words of one of the gentlemen. Yet showcasing "cutting edge" is not the purpose of Rendez-Vous, which brings together, deliberately, a wide range of genres and styles to give New Yorkers a sense of what French filmmakers have been concerned with during the past 12 months or so.

How did this year's festival stack up against those of the past? Quite well, in my opinion, and I managed to catch all 17 films. As usual, there were many more positives than negatives - better than four to one, which is vastly superior to any experience I've had attending a similar number of movies playing in NYC at any given time. For me, the "find" of this fest was Zabou Brietman's The Man of My Life. Ms Brietman's ability to mesh style and content with such beauty and originality has left me panting to see this one again - and to share it with those I love - as soon as possible.

For mainstream romance and comedy, I Do!, The Valet and Ambitious certainly filled the bill. The theme of how parents and politics affect the lives of children found a lovely home in Blame It on Fidel, and the movie bio was well (if rather typically) served by La Vie en Rose, carried mainly on the shoulders of Marion Cotillard, who played Edith Piaf. The documentary field saw Anne Andreu's study, Humbert Balsan: Rebel Producer, while Countdown offered us Balsan's penultimate production; the former, I would not have wanted to miss (and may not have a chance to see again: another reason to hail the yearly Rendez-Vous series).

Two films about twins in a family or society threatening to spin out of control came from Philippe Lioret (Don't Worry, I'm Fine) and Jean-Marc Barr/Pascal Arnold (One to Another). Both had flaws but were well worth seeing. Less so, for me, was another story of raw-youth, badly-used: Murderers by Patrick Grandperret. As a study of character and métier, Xavier Gianolli's The Singer gave Gérard Depardieu and Cécile de France two wonderful roles, which both actors assumed with relish.

On the mystery front, Denis Dercourt's elegant The Page Turner and Guillaume Canet's hot, fast-paced Tell No One were both stunners. And if Benoît Jacquot's The Untouchable offered less than some of his past cinematic outings, for many of us in the audience, his star Isild Le Besco certainly made up for that. My least among these 17 films would be Bruno Dumont's Flanders (although my Greencine colleague David D'Arcy remains a fan, even after a second viewing!) and Christopher Honoré's Inside Paris, with its look at a Parisian family done with some style and a good cast but not enough believability to keep the whole thing grounded.

Nine of these movies have already been picked up for distribution: The Man of My Life, The Valet, Blame It on Fidel, La Vie en Rose, One to Another, The Page Turner, The Untouchable, Flanders and Inside Paris. I think this may be a record for Rendez-Vous; certainly it is very good news for French film buffs around the country.

Posted by dwhudson at March 14, 2007 7:39 PM

Comments

Films from the rendez-vous that need a US distrib pronto: The Singer and Tell No One. Both are hugely enjoyable Gallic films with cross-over potential. The Singer has also being doing fair (though certainly not spectacular) business in other European countries.

And don't listen to James when he puts Flanders and Inside Paris in his biggest disappointments-list: they are well worth seeing, and Paris was even in my Best of 2006 list! It is part of the, excuse the pun, new wave of films inspired by the nouvelle vague but made by directors who have not actually experienced it (another great film in this mould is Norway's Reprise which played at Sundance), effectively clearing the way for some much needed freshness in these reprises of a type of films once known for their freshness.

Posted by: Boyd at March 15, 2007 4:54 AM

Good news for Londoners. Artificial Eye is releasing Dans Paris in May; Gardens in Autumn (Iosseliani) in June: Not Here To Be Loved also in June; Resnais's Private Fears in Public Places in July; The Singer in August; and Lady Chatterley in September.


Posted by: ronald bergan at March 15, 2007 10:05 AM

...while those of us in the States will probably be stuck with The Valet. And perhaps will briefly get a chance to see Lady Chatterly later in the year.

Posted by: Craig P at March 15, 2007 11:50 AM

Boyd -- I, too, find it hard to believe that Tell No One will not be picked up for distribution (unless of course an American remake is already underway.) While I enjoyed The Singer (you'd think Depardieu's name alone would demand a theatrical release), I suspect the film is too French (subtle, understaed, elusive) for Amercian appeal. And yes, Flanders sure is "controversial"! Inside Paris? I don't know. Maybe I closed off to that one too soon.
Ronald -- I do wish I were in England, with all thoe releases coming up.
Craig -- Of course we'll get Lady Chatterly. Sex, sin, nudity and rutting? When did a savvy distributor ever let those get away?

Posted by: James van Maanen at March 15, 2007 3:04 PM

Re: The Singer
Perhaps they should have added a little more (and more explict) sex, sin and nudity (though I'm not sure how many viewers would run to the cinema to see Depardieu naked) and then someone in the US might release it, right?

It is true, though, that it seems that sincere character studies seem to got short-changed in favour of things that are easily marketable: extreme violence! graphic sex! Come one, come all!

As for Dans Paris: I do think it is one of these films that you have to be in the right mood for to get it and perhaps expectations should be low when going in, I don't know. Honoré's two previous films did not particularly excite me and I still find it hilarious that the director of Ma mère is more famous here for his children's books than his films (hence the children's books reference in Inside Paris) but that no one seems particularly bothered in France that the same person could be doing both! Imagine the uproar if JK Rowling directed a Ma mère-ish film... but I digress.

As for the merits of the film itself: I particularly liked the way in which it seems to dictate its own rules: breaking the fourth wall at will; integrating the wildly over-the-top Kim Wilde sequence and the song-over-the-phone; its confused and frustrating first half-hour that reflects Duris's character's state of mind...

I also think it helped that Honoré already knew his two leads from his previous two films and that he cast them both against type; using a shorthand the obviously developped with both performers but trying out new things at the same time. And of course the hilarious meta-moment in which Garrel proves that he indeed has a "must-show nudity clause" written in each film contract... I think this has become something of an in-joke.

Posted by: Boyd at March 16, 2007 2:14 AM

James, I think you should rather wish you were in France where very few films remain unreleased, even in the provinces where I live. Other than London, England is a bleak place to see non-English language films.

Posted by: ronald bergan at March 16, 2007 6:09 AM

Or if you don't fancy France, come to Luxembourg, where not only most French films are released theatrically but also about half of the yearly German output!

Posted by: Boyd at March 16, 2007 6:28 AM

Boyd: you really say so many interesting things so well about Dans Paris that I suppose I had better give it another chance when it appears on DVD. Perhaps it will not drown me in whimsy upon a second viewing. (And by the way, doesn't Duris have his own nudity clause, as well?) Do you live in Luxembourg? You must, else how would you know this much about the movies that open there. I've never been but next time I go to Europe, if there is a next time, I'll try to pay a visit. I was rather taken with a silly little film called "Pulse" (here in the States, "Octane" elsewhere) which I saw several years ago (it starred Madeleine Stowe and Jonathan Rhys-Meyers) and which I believe was filmed there. It had such a great "look," that it's made me curious about the place ever since.

Ronald--
I'd wager you must speak fluent French to be able to see your Friench films on their home turf. I do not, so I must see mine subtitled either here or in England (last time I was in London I caught both Canet's "Time Out"--which did eventually open here--and "Le Roi Danses"--which did not. My ex-wife speaks fluent French, Spanish and some German but I was not blessed with the language gene, alas--and I surely do mean that!

Posted by: James van Maanen at March 26, 2007 3:37 PM