March 21, 2006

Shorts, 3/21.

Michael Dare has a proposal: Edit your own Being There. He's serious. He's got the materials. Who'll pick up the tab to make it happen? Via Coudal Partners.

Triumph des Willens Jonathan Jones: "A lot of illusions about our culture are challenged by watching Triumph of the Will. One of them concerns the modernist heritage.... Film is a mass art. The moderns who understood this were not, sad to say, a handful of surrealist subversives, but the court artists of the most murderous despots of all time."

Also in the Guardian and Observer:

  • Aid agencies are criticizing BBC Films for the traumatic effects Shooting Dogs [blog] is having on victims of the Rwandan genocide, reports Alice O'Keeffe in the Guardian. In the Observer, Linda Melvern, author of Conspiracy to Murder: The Rwandan Genocide, argues that the film "shows a shocking disregard for the historical record." Related: Director Michael Caton-Jones in the Independent: "I knew there was no film-making infrastructure in Rwanda and that it could quite possibly be a very miserable experience all round - but, for fuck's sake, it was their story. How could it not be made there?"

"If you are making a film of Play, you have to find a cinematic correlative to the interrogative light, which the stage directions specify as prompting every speech; otherwise the only alternative is to lock off the camera and record a live performance." The New Statesman runs an appreciation by Anthony Minghella of one of two artists who have "provided a lifelong compass," Samuel Beckett (the other is Bach), followed by further comments from Richard Eyre, Craig Raine, Charles Sturridge and John Hurt.

Rudkin: Vampyr "The British Film Institute has Dreyer fever these days, having just released David Rudkin's study of Vampyr (1932) for their Film Classics book series and several region 2 DVDs, beginning this week with Master of the House and Ordet (1955)," writes Doug Cummings, who goes on to explain why he's happier with the DVDs than with the book.

Stop Smiling runs a tantalizing excerpt from Nicolas Rapold's interview with David Cronenberg. More: the Toronto Star's Peter Howell, via Alison Willmore at the IFC Blog.

Ambiguity is essential to the Don Siegel aesthetic, proposes Dave Kehr, who also highlights the most interesting of this week's DVD releases. Also in the New York Times: Craig Modderno on what Jon Heder's up to, post-Napoleon Dynamite (a lot) and Charles Solomon argues that cartoon characters are too damn chatty these days.

J Hoberman in the Voice: "Possibly the least personal Spike Lee joint in the entire history of cinema, the bank-heist-hostage-policier-cryptoterrorist thriller Inside Man nevertheless manages to be a most enjoyable sampling of the director's treasured 'my way' eccentricities."

Also:

Puzzlehead

V for Vendetta "should be enjoyed as the first true anarchist movie Hollywood has ever made," argues Anthony Kaufman at Alternet. "Film historians speak fondly of the paranoid cycle of American cinema in the 1960s and 70s (The Manchurian Candidate, Three Days of the Condor, The Parallax View) or the countercultural anti-heroic outlaws of Bonnie and Clyde and Badlands, but nowhere in mainstream US cinema - and certainly not post-9/11 - has there been a pop-culture phenomenon that advocates not only overthrowing a corrupt government, but blowing it up." Related: Gill Pringle listens to Natalie Portman for the Independent: "I loved that this film is an abstract thing because, after the Holocaust, people said it would never happen again but now we have Rwanda and Bosnia. Maybe V for Vendetta can remind us to stand up against such despotism." And Jennifer Vineyard interviews Alan Moore for MTV.

Ask the Dust Jonathan Rosenbaum in the Chicago Reader on Ask the Dust: "The depth and intensity of [John] Fante's autocritique are missing from writer-director Robert Towne's sexy, sensual, romantic, nostalgic adaptation of the novel, a labor of love he's been trying to realize for years... But to Towne's credit, he's a thoughtful and conscientious romantic." Related: Peter Sobczynski interviews Towne for Hollywood Bitchslap.

Campaspe praises William Wyler's "phenomenal ability to give his movies a sense of time and space."

In the Independent:

  • David Thomson: "[I]f the papers want to keep on getting movie advertising, they need to subscribe to the overall lie that the movies are worth seeing. In many markets, film critics with high standards have simply lost their jobs because they didn't like enough pictures." Related: Philip French in the Observer: "Sadly perhaps, there is no longer any serious antagonism between critics, film distributors and moviemakers." And at Cinematical, Karina Longworth: "Critical irrelevancy is not a new phenomenon."

  • Sheila Johnstone with the Dardennes: "Animated and genial, Luc, 51, and Jean-Pierre, 54, give interviews with good grace, but they make no secret about being uncomfortable at their red-carpet status." Related: A Reverse Shot triad at indieWIRE on L'Enfant as well as, in Kamera, Edward Lamberti and Antonio Pasolini and, in the Voice, J Hoberman and Dennis Lim.

  • Roger Clarke: "A quick rifle through [Catherine] Deneuve's public diary of the last 12 months shows a great deal of attendance at public events, fancy magazine launches and fashion shows - and very little in the way of acting in the movies."

Nathaniel R, currently anticipating William Friedkin's adaptation of Tracy Letts's play, among other films "coming soon but not soon enough," Bug, is hard at work on his personal list of top 100 "Actors of the Aughts."

Richard Schickel in the Los Angeles Times: "It's the useful business of The Film Snob's Dictionary to make cool, often genuinely witty fun of bad movies and the faux icons who make them." That doesn't mean he approves. More favorable reviews of David Kamp and Lawrence Levi's book: Stanley Kauffmann in the New Republic and Diane Garrett in Variety.

Guess who's happy Crash beat out Brokeback Mountain for the Best Picture Oscar: Slavoj Zizek. Seriously. He explains in the Frankfurter Rundschau (and in German). Via signandsight. Related (and what's more, in English): An exchange in the New York Review of Books on the film between James Schamus, Joel Conarroe and Daniel Mendelsohn.

A few Wenders links worth reviving, via wood s lot: "In Defense of Places," a speech delivered in 2003, and a 2002 exhibition, Pictures from the Surface of the Earth. And, on an entirely different note, Julian Stallabrass in the New Left Review on "Spectacle and Terror."

Noy Thrupkaew for the American Prospect: "That Tsotsi - adapted from playwright Athol Fugard's novel set in a period of harsh apartheid rule in the 50s - has been so effortlessly updated into modern-day South Africa is its own damning statement on the lingering effects of racial oppression. And yet the racial critique remains a subtext in the film - a strong yet scarcely visible undertow."

Grady Hendrix can't help but post about it again, and no wonder: "Given that he makes films at the same rate most blogs are updated, was there ever a doubt that Takashi Miike would take to blogging like a duck to water?"

The Winona Ryder News Channel (no, really) interviews A Scanner Darkly animator Mike Stovall. Via Kim Voynar at Cinematical.

Atonement A Pride & Prejudice reunion of sorts: Director Joe Wright and producer Paul Webster are teaming with Keira Knightley for an adaptation of Ian McEwan's Atonement; Cinematical's Martha Fisher knows more. She's also pointing to David Konow's deep backgrounder on Tron for Tom's Hardware Guide.

For Time, Tim Padgett gets Mel Gibson talking - at length - about Apocalypto. Via Jeffrey Overstreet.

X has news of Hong Sang-soo's next one at Twitch.

Bradford Nordeen revisits a time when movies were made for adults.

Ray Young at Flickhead: "Never maudlin or convoluted, September 12th develops an authentic air of both mystery and sorrow."

Peter Nellhaus: "Considering the quality of some of the action films currently, or recently, in theaters, The Touch is as good, if not better."

Kevin Gilvear has a long talk with Christina Lindberg for DVD Times. Via Blake at Cinema Strikes Back.

Aidan Smith talks with Jane Birkin for the Scotsman. Via Ray Pride at Movie City Indie.

Is DIY filmmaking a myth? Sujewa Ekanayake and Caveh Zahedi discuss.

Lots of talk at ShoWest about how and where we'll be watching movies in the near future; reports from Leonard Klady and Gary Dretzka at Movie City News and, via MCN, Scott Bowles for USA Today. Also: A springtime release schedule from the New York Daily News.

Edward Jay Epstein in Slate: "The hand of Tokyo may not always be visible in the dazzling glitter of Hollywood, but it has enabled the industry to re-invent itself."

Dave Kehr: "Hollywood seems to be following the same strategy that served America so well in the Cold War: just outspend the bastards, and sooner or later, their system will collapse."

Universal's banned Anne Thompson. Nikki Finke finds out why while Eugene Hernandez comments: "The message sent by such a decree from a studio chief is quite clear: don't piss us off or we'll cut you off."

Snakes on a Plane needs your music.

New: Brand Hype, a critical resource on product placement in the movies.

Hitch and Truffaut Online listening tip #1. The Hitchcock/Truffaut Tapes #1, at If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger....

Online listening tip #2. Friday's Leonard Lopate Show features Molly Haskell talking about TCM's Essentials series and Wim Wenders talking about Don't Come Knocking.

Online viewing tip #1. Simon Pegg talks about prepping for The Hot Fuzz. Via Todd at Twitch.

Online viewing tip #2. Filmmaker's Scott Macaulay has found Jim Jarmusch's video for The Raconteurs and an online fiddling around tip as well: Criticker, a "personalized film recommendation engine."



Bookmark and Share

Posted by dwhudson at March 21, 2006 2:53 PM

Comments

"The Winona Ryder News Channel (no, really) interviews A Scanner Darkly animator Mike Stovall"

Well, yes, really

Posted by: wrnc at March 21, 2006 4:55 PM

And it's a good thing, too. Wouldn't have seen that terrific Another Magazine piece otherwise - I look forward to exploring the Channel further.

Posted by: David Hudson at March 22, 2006 7:19 AM

Wow, I found Lynn Barber's interview with Vanessa Redgrave truly obnoxious. But not, as Barber would have us believe, because of the subject! It's all her.

Posted by: Hannah E. at March 22, 2006 9:13 AM

David, do you know of a decent online German/English translation engine? I tried to use Babel Fish on that Zizek article, and here's an example of what I got:

"And the overwhelming victory of L.A. Crash, then continues to read the pretty theory, owes themselves alone the bad conscience of the Filmacademy, instead of for gay and alone therefore extremely mismatching Westernepos now at least for a politically correct, particularly since wanted to decide anti-racistic and alone therefore film raised over each doubt."

Posted by: Karina at March 22, 2006 11:24 AM

Hannah, I agree, and yet at the same time, this is one of the benefits of the British (and generally speaking, European as well) form of interviews over the strict Q&A format: You get a much clearer idea of who's actually posing the questions, where the interests lie and, to some extent, why the interviewee reacts the way s/he does. This case is a good example of why that can be good to know.

Karina, yikes. Kind of a fun read, but of course, ultimately frustrating. I'm afraid I don't know of a good full-text automatic translator, online or off. There may be one, but I haven't heard of it; as far as I know, we humans are still way ahead here.

I was actually hoping to find an English version out there somewhere and it might happen, eventually. I've noticed that fairly often: a Zizek text runs in a German paper and, about two or three weeks later, it appears in In These Times or something. Wish I had time to translate it myself, but I'll say this: it is, as always with Zizek, an entertaining ride, but no, this time, I just can't agree with him.

Posted by: David Hudson at March 22, 2006 12:46 PM

Yes, it is a good example of that, and certainly worthwhile as a reminder to readers (there's a motive behind the thread of Q&As). As an interviewer you bring to the table your own notions about someone and particularly their work. You steer the questions that way. It's always jarring to meet the reality of the person. I remember all those s[n]ide comments about Neil Jordan after this last round of interviews. Very amusing, actually. I found it theraputic to read them.
But Lynn Barber is so bloody annoying! I hope I don't ever get stuck in a conversation with her (I'll be sure to steer clear of world issues).

Posted by: Hannah E. at March 22, 2006 1:18 PM

And to steer clear of Celebrity Big Brother, too!

The only time I actually make her laugh is when she is droning on about the morons who watch programmes like Celebrity Big Brother and I tell her, 'You're talking to one of them,' and she throws her head back and laughs with genuine amusement.

Hm-hm. I'm sure.

Posted by: David Hudson at March 22, 2006 1:27 PM

Google's translation engine seems to work a little better than Babelfish. Or at least, it worked decently when my blog was translated into Spanish - maybe it made it make more sense, actually! But all these translation engines are imperfect.

Too bad you can't actually place a babelfish in your ear, a la Hitchhiker's Guide.

Posted by: Craig P at March 22, 2006 4:39 PM