September 21, 2005
NWFF. 10.
For Sean Axmaker, a film critic for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and a DVD columnist for the IMDb, an anniversary celebration presents a unique opportunity for his hometown.
Seattle filmgoers are proud of the city's reputation as a film town. It is home to the "longest" film festival in the country, the Seattle International Film Festival (its epic 3½ week span effectively keeps the national and international review press scared off, leaving it completely to local audiences). Before Sundance and the rise of saturation releasing, Seattle was a launching pad for American Independent films like Choose Me and The Stunt Man and the early work of John Sayles.
But the city has a dirty little secret. Unlike Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, British Columbia, our neighbors to the north and south, Seattle - for all of its boutique film festivals and art-house theaters - has no full-time cinemateque.
Ten years ago, a trio of hardy cinema-loving citizens with more ambition and determination than resources (Jamie Hook, Deborah Girdwood, and Michael Seiwerath) decided to take a stab at filling the gap. They formed the non-profit Northwest Film Forum and embarked on twin missions: simply put, to show films that aren't getting shown in this town, and (through sister organization WigglyWorld) to help the local filmmaking community get films made (and, hopefully, shown on the screen).
Ten years later, and a full year after they moved operations to a fully integrated center for film exhibition (on two screens), production and education on Capitol Hill, NWFF decided to celebrate their achievement. And while they've titled the ten-day/30-event program "Super Hits, Vol. 10" in the K-Tel mode, the selection is really the Hollywood equivalent of B-sides, imports and regional indie pressings, with a couple of golden oldies tossed in. A showcase of programs both popular and essential, it shows exactly why the city of Seattle needs the Northwest Film Forum.
Revival showings of Pickup on South Street, Flowers of Shanghai and The Match Factory Girl are a reminder that the ambitious director retrospectives common in most acknowledged "film towns" had been all but absent from the Seattle scene until NWFF started their weekend series in their original theater, the Grand Illusion in the University District. The same theater had the privilege of hosting the world theatrical premiere of Steven Soderbergh's Schizopolis, which the director made to get Hollywood and its conventions out of his system. Three locally produced features - Money Buys Happiness, Buffalo Bill's Defunct and Hedda Gabler - were begun with grants from WigglyWorld, and another (Naked Proof, from NWFF founder Jamie Hook) was produced with help from the organization. Music documentaries and shorts programs (local and international) are sprinkled around essentials of world cinema, like Abbas Kiarostami's Close-Up, that would have passed the city by were it not for the NWFF.
Is such programming still essential when the DVD revolution has redefined home video as an alternative distribution network for foreign, independent and alternative cinema? It's true that film programming is entering hard times as arts funding gets cut and an increasing number of entertainment alternatives vie for attention. But not everything is on DVD (God bless the programmers for bringing back the astounding Olivier Assayas rarity Cold Water, one of the of the most uncompromising films about teenage rebellion, alienation and inarticulate frustration), and some things may never be (Raiders of the Lost Ark: The Adaptation, for example, the film recreated by a trio of Mississippi pals with a primitive home video camera and zero-budget solutions to big-budget challenges in the 1980s). At least as important, however, is the social component: seeing films with an audience and talking about them afterwards in the spacious NWFF lobby (which seems designed to invite audiences to linger and chat) is becoming a forgotten dimension of the cinema experience.
The final program of the retrospective series, a showing of the Yasujiro Ozu silent classic Woman of Tokyo, with an original score by Wayne Horvitz commissioned by NWFF for its Ozu retrospective in early 2005, celebrates one of the greatest film programs ever curated in the city of Seattle. But since that event, NWFF seems lost, scrambling to redefine its identity and its mission. Programming in the past 6 months looks more like a schizophrenic rep house than a non-profit center for alternative and classic cinema programming, and its second screen, once packed with alternative fare, is woefully underused. There are many reasons for this - creative, political, financial, philosophical - but it also reflects the clash of NWFF's identity as a maverick non-profit and the expectations that many of us (me included) put on the organization that would be the city's cinemateque.
More than simply an illustration of why we need the NWFF, "Super Hits Vol. 10" could serve as the starting point for the next step in its evolution. At the very least it should inspire the discussion. Seattle still needs a full-time cinemateque, one with a strong philosophy behind its mission and a focus to its programming. NWFF could become that - it's not like anyone else is stepping up to the plate (Cinema Seattle, producers of SIFF, has flirted with the idea for years but in practice has scaled back activities to nothing but the annual festival, and the Seattle Art Museum has treated cinema as a poor relation to all other arts in its mission). It would call for a serious reevaluation of its goals, a more rigorous approach to curating its programming and an influx of monetary support to feed it (for all my criticism, it's hard to fault the organization for competing with Seattle's commercial programming venues simply to stay afloat).
It's an evolution I'd like to see. It's time for Seattle cinema to hold its own with the rest of the country's film towns.
"Super Hits Vol. 10" runs from Friday, September 23 through Sunday, October 12, at Northwest Film Forum, 1515 12th Ave, Seattle, Washington.
Posted by dwhudson at September 21, 2005 1:03 AM
Good piece, I agree that it seems the NWFF isn't living up to the promise of great programs like the Ozu retrospective. I've been wondering why that second screen has been frequently darkened lately, and why they've seemed to have stopped running their late night programs.
Something Sean does fail to mention however, is that the Grand Illusion, which he does mention as the original home of the Wiggly World, is still alive and kicking, seperate from the NWFF, and is doing some good things. Over the next few weeks, they're presenting (the Seattle debuts of?) some international films that would otherwise not get a local screening outside of the SIFF: OR: MY TREASURE, A STATE OF MIND, MY BEAUTIFUL GIRL MARI, and RED ORCHESTRA. Keep an eye on their website: http://www.grandillusioncinema.org
Posted by: ted cogswell at September 21, 2005 8:50 AMThe "original" little theatre, on the second floor of Scarecrow (where Mr. Axmaker used to write the wonderful program notes), slightly pre-dated the NWFF run but thank goodness Mr. Seiwerath persisted when others (like myself) departed. Further still, the Grand Illusion is doing fine work without much recognition. It's enough to make me miss living in Seattle. Almost.
Posted by: Jonathan Marlow at September 21, 2005 9:26 AMThere are a couple things I (as a representative of NWFF) should point out.
First off, we put production as highly as we do exhibition, most notably having helped to produce five features through the Start-to-Finish grant (through which NWFF aids on all aspects of a production, from fundraising to the actual filming to help with festival placement and distribution), including Rob Devor's POLICE BEAT, which premiered in Competition at Sundance last year. We just announced our latest S2F recipient, David Russo, an internationally-acclaimed short filmmaker who is making his feature debut. We're brought Guy Maddin's latest feature to Seattle and helped countless productions in the city.
Secondly, doing a hugely ambitious retrospective the size and scope of the Ozu series is financially impossible to do more than once every year or two for an independent institution. We do what we can under the circumstances and since Ozu have brought a steady stream of fantastic films and retrospectives to town, some of which (such as Alex Mackenzie's The Exiles, the films of Kira Muratova, Jem Cohen's Chain, etc) will never arrive in the city in any other form. And while there are other venues in town, nobody else has made an effort to bring experimental or non-mainstream film to the city. It's good to hold arts institutions to the highest possible standards, but do keep in mind the practical complications are a little more involved than simply having the desire to show something.
It's hard for a theatre to continue showing non-mainstream stuff when no one comes. My friend and I were the *only* people in the audience for a 7:00 PM Wednesday show of Memories of Murder--arguably the best police procedural ever made. And there were a total of 8 people in the audience for the 2nd half of Star Spangled to Death (down from 12 at the first half), probably the greatest film to play in Seattle this year. Sean, you weren't there.
But Seattle isn't the film town it used to like to think it was. I recently saw Autumn Sonata at the Grand Illusion--maybe a dozen people. When it showed at the Neptune during its revival house, different-double-bill-every-day, days in the 80s, it was so full I had to sit in the balcony.
I think we have to face the fact that people would much rather stay home and watch tv.
Thanks for those comments. I had meant this article to be the beginning of a conversation, not an end to it. I have been a fan and a supporter of the NWFF from the beginning and remain so, and I certainly did not mean to dismiss the programming in the months since Ozu. I applaud the Film Forum for what it has accomplished -- the film series really doesn’t do justice to its legacy, nor could it. I have nothing but respect for those who don’t just curate the programming but keep the very organization alive. And, of course, I count Adam Hart among my friends (as I do Jonathan Marlowe - and BTW, I just came back from a screening at the Grand Illusion, my favorite pocket theater in town). I certainly hope that Adam -- and everyone who reads this-- see this not as an attack upon the organization, but as a starting point for a discussion of the future of non-mainstream film programming in Seattle.
My frustration isn’t with the Film Forum but with the inability of Seattle to create and sustain a real cinemateque on the level that Vancouver and Portland have managed. That the Film Forum has done so much with minimal support from government arts organizations is undeniable. That the City of Seattle is still lacking a true cinemateque, however, is also undeniable.
I think part of the problem is actually Scarecrow Video. Not knocking the place in the slightest, I'm wearing their t-shirt as we speak, but I think that it has undeniably made Seattle film culture even more video-oriented than most other places. It takes occasional reminders of "This isn't available on DVD!" like in all the press surrounding the Aki Kaurismaki retrospective a couple years back to actually drive us out of our living rooms. Speaking of which, I'd love to see Match Factory Girl again if I didn't already have plans for that night. Wonderful film.
Though I guess to respond to ratzkywatzky, I'm not even sure if there were even that many during Star Spangled to Death. But would you care to share your thoughts on the film with me? I couldn't convince any of my friends to come along (something about the words "seven hour experimental film" tends to scare most people off) and I've been dying to discuss it with somebody.
Posted by: Josh at September 22, 2005 2:51 AM(Originally written for NWFF, although they cut it significantly -- I present it here in the original form...)
Without institutions like SIFF, Scarecrow Video and the Northwest Film Forum (all organizations which I was fortunately, if briefly, involved at one time or another), Hou Hsiao-hsien would largely be an unknown figure in Seattle. This would be a shame, of course, since Hou is among the few contemporary filmmakers that easily falls into the so-called “Master” category – a group that is sadly somewhat limited to Abbas Kiarostami, Claire Denis, Hirokazu Kore-eda, Bela Tarr, Wong Kar-wai, arguably Raúl Ruiz, Julio Medem, Olivier Assayas and a handful of others. It isn’t a coincidence that, if memory serves, the work of each of these directors has screened at one of the NWFF venues in the past decade.
Most directors would be satisfied to have even a moment in their film as lovely as anything to be found in A Time to Live and a Time to Die, City of Sadness, The Puppetmaster, Goodbye South, Goodbye or even Flowers of Shanghai. Where some may fault him for nearly everything produced since this latter feature, even a weaker effort from HHH is superior to the best work of others. Hou grasped the importance early-on of making films that are actually about something. We’ve seemed to have forgotten that sense of purpose in this country.
The citizens of Seattle rarely realize how fortunate they are to have these little treasures grace their scattered screens. Spoiled, really. Happiest of anniversaries to NWFF and the wonderful folks (staff and audiences alike) that keep it thriving.
– Jonathan Marlow (né Robert Graves)
Posted by: Jonathan Marlow at October 4, 2005 6:51 PM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email