August 6, 2005
Weekend shorts.
Sheldrake and Tim Robbins have a long, freewheeling and very fun talk at Ain't It Cool News, not just about Embedded, but also about The Power of Nightmares, Gore Vidal and the film and theater productions Robbins is working on now.
"When I first saw Paris Is Burning in Los Angeles in 1991 it blew me away." So now, with that doc headed for DVD later in the year and director Jennie Livingston's short, Who's the Top?, on the festival circuit, Eugene Hernandez has five questions for her. But she has far more than five answers, really; sharp stuff. Also at indieWIRE, another fine interview, Michael Koresky's with Junebug director Phil Morrison.
James Israel isn't the first to point out that two very different takes on the South are opening this weekend; he just does it very well. Chuck Tryon, in the meantime, previews another, Screen Door Jesus, which "elegantly weaves together several narratives set in the small east Texas town of Bethlehem, reflecting on race, class, and politics, particularly as they are inflected by religious belief and practice."
Joseph Epstein opens his review of David Thomson's The Whole Equation and and Edward Jay Epstein's The Big Picture in Commentary with a fun Hollywood anecdote of his own - before essentially agreeing with both authors' pessimistic outlook: "Globalism, whatever else may be said for it, also means lowest-common-denominatorism, and technology plays right into it." Via Arts & Letters Daily.
George Fasel: "Let us put aside for a moment that The Conformist (1970) is the most magnificently photographed, scored, choreographed, and costumed film made - ever, anywhere - because while those are not insignificant achievements, there is more to this work by Bernardo Bertolucci, who finished it when he was just short of thirty." More from La Depressionada, though the comments turn into a lively yet (reasonably) civil debate on Polanski.
Jonathan Rosenbaum on Saraband: "The performances are perfectly distilled, but the traits I dislike in Bergman are all here - self-pity, brutality, spiritual constipation, and an unwillingness to try to overcome these difficulties." And: "Like Thomas Pynchon's Vineland, Broken Flowers can be read largely as a querulous lament for the 60s counterculture, for what it became."
For Slate's David Edelstein, "Broken Flowers is Jarmusch's most conventionally entertaining film, but it's still visually rigorous, swimming in pregnant silences, and un-filled-in in a way that's tantalizing," while for David Gilmour of the Globe and Mail, where Liam Lacey interviews Bill Murray, it's "a terrific performance piece for a handful of good actors, an engaging metaphor and a so-so piece of storytelling." More from Canfield at Twitch, Stephanie Zacharek in Salon, Bradley Steinbacher in the Stranger and Ty Burr in the Boston Globe.
At Cinemarati, acquarello opens a thread on Tsai Ming-liang's The Wayward Cloud, "a good step forward for the filmmaker in terms of evolving and maturing his familiar themes, but I honestly can't see this one as converting any Tsai detractors or gaining him exposure to a wider audience." There are no detractors in the thread as yet; they simply disagree on which previous film is superior, What Time Is It There? or Goodbye Dragon Inn.
Take a look at over 60 different people and a dog wearing Albert Maysles's glasses. Jess Search explains; via Movie City Indie, where Ray Pride argues - well - that the Los Angeles Times should have killed Mary McNamara's piece on Jarmusch before it ever saw print or pixels.
Also via MCI:
Just like us, Salon's Stephanie Zacharek couldn't think of a better title for her appreciation than "In the Mood for Leung." Mark Olsen also scores an interview for the LAT.
Manohla Dargis lauds both the film and its maker: "Memory turns finite moments into spaces - a hotel room, say - that we return to again and again. It gives us a glimpse of the eternal and, like art at its most sublime, like this film, a means for transcendence." Salon's Andrew O'Hehir essentially agrees, but, via Chris Barsanti, Slant's Ed Gonzales offers a contrary opinion: "Like a fucked-up commentary track for its predecessor, the film is both coyly self-reflexive and self-consciously detached, irritating even..."
But back in the NYT:
In Dear Wendy, I think primarily it is about Lars [von Trier] and the white man feeling inferior to the black male... Lars is always talking about black men's genitals and the size of them and he is deeply fascinated and envious about it, and I do, too. In this way, the film treats America in the same way the film treats black men - something we're somehow inferior to, and attracted to at the same time. This is not a very precise answer. The more precise answer is that Lars does not want to be politically correct.
But Independent critic Anthony Quinn is as underwhelmed with the film as Bradshaw is. The Telegraph's Sukhdev Sandhu is more generous: "[F]or all its periodic moments of grace, and rapturous gun-fights, we finish the film a little puzzled: why does one of the most talented directors of his generation persist in standing in the shadows of Lars von Trier?"
Meanwhile, Tiffany Rose finds that Michael Keaton presses fewer hot buttons.
Back to the LAT:
For the LA CityBeat, Perry Crowe writes an ode to the Vista Theatre while Andy Klein asks, "Has there been any other event in the last year – or even in the entire young millennium – as significant for Los Angeles film lovers as the opening of the American Cinematheque's second location, at the Aero Theatre in Santa Monica?" Also: Klein on 2046 and Broken Flowers and Donnell Alexander on the joys of bootlegs.
Back to theaters for a moment: Scott Kirsner, who recently had a forward-looking chat with Mark Urman, head of distribution at THINKfilm, points to a piece Jenn Abelson had in the Boston Globe a couple of weeks ago on Cinema de Lux, which "may represent the future of movie theaters."
David Lowery files a dispatch from the Dallas Video Festival, "the oldest video festival in the country."
Matthew Clayfield takes the Brisbane International Film Festival to task for not featuring "Australian shorts and features that haven't had exposure elsewhere (as opposed to merely screening a number of Australian films that have either already premiered somewhere else or which are about to get theatrical release anyhow) with a mind to push the boundaries of the film culture at large."
Peter Chan's Perhaps Love, "[b]illing itself as the first movie musical to be shot in China in 40 years," as Gregg Kilday writes in the Hollywood Reporter, will be closing the Venice Film Festival next month. Kilday talks with producer Andre Morgan about the rush to get it completed in time.
Charlie at Cinema Strikes Back on The Rider Named Death: "It won't knock your socks off, but this recent Russian film succeeds in probing the question of 'What motivates a terrorist?' by looking at an early 1900s Russian revolutionary."
"[T]here were so many ways in which [Welcome to] Dongmakgol could have gone wrong." But according to Kyu Hyun Kim, it doesn't. Also at Koreanfilm.org: Adam Hartzell on Kim Sang-jin's Ghost House, "not a brilliant film, just a good one."
Criterion will be releasing Mike Leigh's Naked in September. For Ed Champion, "this film's ballsy magnificence, multilayered characters and deceptively fragmented narrative cannot be overpraised."
Rumor has it that People on Sunday is headed to a Region 1 DVD release at some point; in the meantime, you can see reviews of two Region 2 versions at DVD Beaver. Matt Langdon recently caught the 1929 film "made by Robert Siodmak, Curt Siodmak, Edgar G Ulmer, written by Billy Wilder and shot by Eugen Schüfften and Fred Zinnemann" which "captures the exuberance of youth and the general nature of human beings on a weekend in Berlin in the 1920s."
Nicola Christie talks to Green Street director Lexi Alexander (and in case you're wondering, the film is known as Hooligans stateside).
Also in the Telegraph:
Online viewing tips #1 through #6. Clips from landmark avant works, part of the seven-disc set due from the Anthology Film Archives in October, Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film, 1894 - 1941. Doug Cummings recommends that you get that set and Kino's Avant-Garde: Experimental Cinema of the 1920s and 30s.
Online viewing tip #7. Tom Hall on an online solid gold standard: "The Residents have always held a special place in my heart... I haven't seen them in years, but over the past few months, via a series of web animations, I think I have found their heir: Weebl."
Online viewing tips, two more rounds. Short works by Bryan Boyce via the DVblog, also pointing to loops from the X(818) Video Project.
Posted by dwhudson at August 6, 2005 2:45 PM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email