July 1, 2005
Shorts, 7/1.
In his lengthy piece in the New York Times on how Steven Spielberg and Tony Kushner are approaching the, shall we say, touchy subject matter of Vengeance, "the tale of a secret Mossad hit squad ordered to assassinate Palestinian terrorists after the massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics in Munich," David M Halbfinger plays straight into the director's hands, argues Nick Davis.
It's quite a rant. On the one hand, "Spielberg's
At Twitch, Josh Ralske finds Lu Chuan's Kekexili "austere, unsentimental, morally complex, and grimly realistic."
At the IFC Blog, Alison Willmore finds herself a bit underwhelmed by Park Chul-soo's Green Chair.
Slashdotters discuss Planet Tokyo's collection of stories on the state of the anime business.
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe has all the makings of the first in a projected series, i.e., a franchise. But the marketing for it, warns Charlotte Higgins, "will probably take place in the one place they might hope that their children could enjoy a respite from the turbid flood of commerce into which their children are increasingly swept: the classroom.... 'We want to combine the best in the world of entertainment with the best in the world of education,' says [Walden Media's Cary] Granat. Others might call it stealth marketing."
Also in the Guardian: Dorian Lynskey on Troy Duffy and Overnight; Tanya Gold can't find a superheroine to celebrate, and Peter Bradshaw gives WotW two out of five stars.
The New York Press presents a two-story cover package (JR Taylor and Jim Knipfel), a "Requiem for the Indies." Video outlets, that is, in NYC.
Also:
Christopher Bray in the New Statesman: "[Robert] Mitchum was one of the first actors for whom less was more, and it can be hard to get a grip on precisely what he did in front of the camera.... Are we talking about acting, then, or rather a heightened sense of being? Is the biggest trick great actors pull to make us believe that, unlike the rest of us, they are content within their own skin?"
In the London Times, Sean Macaulay tells the stories behind the studio logos that appear before their features, from the Rank gong to the 20th Century Fox searchlights, from Columbia's Lady Liberty to Universal's globe, Paramount's mountain and MGM's Leo.
In the Independent, Hugh Brody issues a call "for anthropologists to work with filmmakers on films that are committed, first of all, to listening to what indigenous people have to say."
Aaron Dobbs and Lily Oei interview Bill Irwin for the Gothamist.
Movie City News prompts a return visit to McSweeney's:
Online viewing tip #1. "Bench," Lowe's ad for Stella Artois. Brilliant. Via Coudal Partners, who've been up to it again themselves: "Equal."
Online viewing tip #2. A clip from MirrorMask. Best dressing sequence since the opening of Dangerous Liaisons. Via Quint at Ain't It Cool News.
Online viewing tips #3 and #4. "Why Close the G8?" and today's edition of Rocketboom, both via Matt Clayfield.
Posted by dwhudson at July 1, 2005 10:36 AM
Thanks for the unexpected attention to my post about Spielberg and the Times article. Quite a discussion has emerged in the Comments section, largely thanks to the readers you sent my way, and I hope it continues.
I also appreciate your own measured reaction to what I wrote. I'm happy to take my lumps. In response, I will only say that it's perhaps over-much to praise a director for taking time to plan his projects, especially when they have such explicit and incendiary political content. I'm glad, as you are, that Spielberg is feeling reflective, but why are these reflections "newsworthy" in and of themselves, and newsworthy in such a fawning, hands-off way, except insofar as it would be unconscionable to approach such a project without at least a modicum of forethought?
Posted by: Nick at July 2, 2005 12:15 AMTouching briefly on something that Nick said, David, I just wanted to mention that I always enjoy and appreciate the occasional interjection of your own thoughts and opinions amidst all the linkage. It's (appropriately) infrequent, but very welcome.
Posted by: dvd at July 2, 2005 12:53 AMClearing out spam after a road trip in preparation for a plane trip, I'm delighted to discover two real comments by two real people! First, David, thanks; I'd love to interject more, if only there were more space and more time. I really try to hone the shorts down to some vague notion of "what's actually interesting," and I'm shocked nearly every day to see them just run on and on and on. Some of the items I'd like to comment more on but, besides not wanting to see these entries twice as long as they already are, by the time they're all prepped, other duties are seen to and such, the day, somehow, is long gone.
Meantime, Nick, I've just caught up with the discussion at your blog, which is terrifically thought-provoking. You've got some mighty sharp readers, but that's certainly no surprise. And I really didn't mean to poke at you; "quite a rant" is a compliment! My own comments were meant to reflect how seriously I take the points you've made and to offer a few "on the other hand" speculations they aroused.
As for the "newsworthy" aspect, I would have to read Halbfinger's article again, but if the focus of the article really is Spielberg's reflections, that's troublesome; but I don't think there's any way to get around the newsworthiness of Steven Spielberg making a movie about Israeli assassins. To complicate matters, knowing that there's going to be coverage of this project, how should he get word out that he's not rushing into the project without that modicum of forethought, as you say? Are there other ways of cutting off the criticism he's expecting at the pass before misconceptions take hold and solidify? I'm just playing devil's advocate here, Nick.
Meantime, I'm intrigued by what's attracted Spielberg to this project in the first place. One of your readers points out that the movie, of course, doesn't have to be made. But one of our most PR-savvy directors is going for it anyway - why? And let's not forget the Kushner factor; that doubles my interest right there. So naturally, I'll be reading just about anything and everything that pops up about this film. And I'll bet there are more than a few editors out there who know there's a whole slew of suckers like me out there.
[g]
Posted by: David Hudson at July 3, 2005 11:54 AM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email