April 9, 2005

Weekend shorts.

Werner Herzog Oops. Werner Herzog was scheduled to speak in Williamstown, Massachusetts, next year but popped up on Thursday. "These accidents sometimes have a special charm," he told his audience, as John E Mitchell reports for the North Adams Transcript. It was evidently quite a talk. Among the topics covered were his controversial methods of staging scenes in his docs to get at an "ecstatic truth," far deeper than the "accountant's truth" - in other words, mere facts.

It is a gift that you can develop and you can develop it by experiencing fundamental things like knowing what it means to be starving, what it means to be incarcerated, knowing what it means to raise children, knowing what it means to be shot at unsuccessfully. That's a deep experience, when people open fire at you and you aren't hit. You experience that and you develop into a human being who knows the human part, knows it better than others, and knowing the heart of men.

That's the sort of thing he'd teach at film school. First item on the agenda, though, would be lock-picking. Then maybe stealing cars.

Meantime, "Dudley Smith" offers a first glimpse of Herzog's Wild Blue Yonder, featuring Brad Dourif, at Ain't It Cool News.

That first story comes via Movie City Indie, where Ray Pride's also found:

Christopher Doyle and Pen-ek Ratanaruang

Kings and Queens The series "In the Company of Anraud Desplechin" runs April 13 through 17 at the BAMcinématek in New York, peaking on the 15th with a Q&A session with the director while the Wexner Center for the Arts in Columbus launches its own retrospective on April 16, picking it up again every couple of days through the end of the month. AO Scott explains why he considers Desplechin "one of the most intriguing French filmmakers of his generation: those directors, mostly in their 40's, who came up in the long shadow of the new wave, too young to have participated in the tumult of the 1960's but too close to that decade to shake off its hangover."

Also in the New York Times:

Truffaut "It's hard to believe that François Truffaut died 21 years ago, in 1984, at the age of 52," writes Gilbert Adair:

Since his death his reputation has been coloured by two tenacious myths. One, that he was perhaps the last true humanist of European cinema, a director whose work was infallibly "tender", "sensitive" and "compassionate", and whose aesthetic credo might have been "women and children first". And, two, that he ended by selling out to the system he had formerly attacked as a critic, an alleged capitulation to commercial imperatives for which he was to find himself vilified by more than a few fair-weather fans.

Adair sets out to debunk both. Also in the Guardian:

  • "What happens to celebrities after they die?" asks Dan Glaister. "Well, for an increasing number of them, they are likely to end up endorsing a product they would never have imagined in their lifetime, will have their faces plastered over everything from credit cards to mouse pads, and will find their earnings outstripping their mortal returns."

Anatomy of a Murder
  • John Patterson on Anatomy of a Murder: "Forty-six years on, in our backward-looking, old-fashioned era, it's as modern as tomorrow morning."

  • Andrew Pulver's adaptation of the week: Disney's The Jungle Book.

  • Chris Roberts: "At 56, Margot [Kidder]'s own story trumps any movie mythology for drama, and it's a relief to hear that despite her 1990s hell, it resolves itself with our leading lady as 'a grandmother with my dogs and nice friends here in the Rocky mountains. Ever see the movie A River Runs Through It? That's where I live.'"

"A reader asks: What happens to a director who's not in the guild?" Daniel Engber, Slate's explainer on this one, maps Robert Rodriguez's options.

Sydney Morning Herald readers - a lot of them - respond to the question David Dale posed on Thursday: "Is Nicole's time up?" Via Movie City News.

Roger Avary: "Neil Gaiman and I are currently hiding out in a hotel on the California coast feverishly executing change notes for Bobby Z. (our mob name for Robert Zemeckis, who occasionally calls our cells and says 'mush, mush!')."

How to review a friend/acquaintance's film? Straight-ahead honesty is the most helpful approach, as Matt Clayfield demonstrates. Flaws are noted, unflinchingly, but in the end: "Deadroom is one film by four directors, not four films by four directors, and that's at once both its greatest strength and the most subtle and effective of its charms."

The latest from Japan via Twitch: logboy passes along word from Nausicaa.net that the last film Hayao Miyazaki directs before he retires might be an adaptation of the Chinese book, Wo Diushile Wode Xiaonanhai (I Lost My Little Boy). Note well that it's the author of the book saying so, not Miyazaki. Also: The Gomorrahizer points to sites for Mitsuo Kurotsuchi's Semishigure and Izuru Narushima's Fly, Daddy, Fly.

Planet Bollywood: "Dismal! That's the word to describe the first quarter of the year 2005."

Wisconsin Film Festival Dan Erdman has been covering the Wisconsin Film Festival for Film Threat: Days 1, 2, 3 and 4. Also: The American Cinemateque unveils a program of "movies not available on video."

Salon's Laura Miller interviews Ian McEwan.

Bear with me a moment: A Saul Bellow roundup:

"The Ghostly Social Aspects of Cinema" is sort of an unusual name for a conference, but the program seems promising. April 14 through 16 at the Jan van Eyck Adademy in Maastricht.



Bookmark and Share

Posted by dwhudson at April 9, 2005 8:50 AM

Comments

Oh, God, you quote me and I sound like I can't write for crap. Moral? Don't merge two sentences into one and not read over them.

Could you change the second "its" of my quote to "the"?

Posted by: Matt at April 9, 2005 3:02 PM

You know, I read right over that, too. We're all simply working too quickly. Anyway: tweak's tweaked.

I seriously need to get around to writing about Deadroom and the other films I caught at SXSW, too... Soon, soon.

Posted by: David Hudson at April 9, 2005 4:18 PM

I think there's something about text on screen that's detrimental to the reading and writing processes. The hyperlink especially has conditioned us to skim, jump and dart our eyes around a text, looking for key words, usually links, that will give us the gist of what's been written without our having to sit there and read the whole thing word for word. If we want to really read something, we have to print it off and hold it in our hands. We don't read things on the computer; we scan them.

Posted by: Matt at April 9, 2005 4:38 PM