May 6, 2004
Shorts, 5/6.
Craig Unger in Salon:
But exactly what is in the movie that could so alienate the first family? I have some idea because Moore interviewed me for the movie for several hours.... Moore had been among the first to assert in the press that a large-scale evacuation of prominent Saudis from the United States began shortly after 9/11 - for which he was derided by critics as a conspiratorialist.
As it happens, my research for House of Bush, House of Saud backed up his charges.
The New York Times runs an editorial on the Disney-Moore brouhaha: "It is hard to say which rationale for blocking distribution is more depressing. But it is clear that Disney loves its bottom line more than the freedom of political discourse."
Then, with Laura M Holson, Jim Rutenberg follows up on the story by reporting on the clash between the two parties, mostly on television, and on the prospects of Fahrenheit 9/11 finding another distributor - which are pretty good, evidently. And hopefully. Meanwhile, discussion in the NYT readers' forums is, as you'd expect, lively.
More in the NYT:
Posted by dwhudson at May 6, 2004 7:25 AM
Heh, I got 8/10 on that quiz. I was deeply disappointed about getting the question related to Etre et avoir right in particular; it's just hit cinemas here so we've been getting the reviews telling us about all how moving it is and so forth... so to discover it ended with Lopez suing the filmmakers makes it look a little less sweet somehow...
Posted by: James Russell at May 6, 2004 7:50 AMI got 8/10 too. Missed the Etre et Avoir and Gimme Shelter questions.
Posted by: Brian at May 6, 2004 11:43 AMI missed those two, too; the third? Oddly enough, what with all the goings on, I couldn't believe Bowling for Columbine had been named best doc. Not that it isn't terrific or anything, but... absolute tip-top best?
Posted by: David Hudson at May 6, 2004 2:01 PMWhen that poll was announced, I remember thinking it was really rather ludicrous for Columbine, which is entertaining but has questionable credentials as a documentary (what really does it document, other than Moore's own escapades across North America? I think another term, like "essay film" might be more apporpriate. Maybe I'm just being overly strict in my definition after watching too many Frederick Wiseman films.) to come in at #1. Which is why it stuck in my head.
Posted by: Brian at May 6, 2004 6:17 PMI'm very proud of my doc-geeky background and my 9 out of 10 score, but ashamed that I didn't know George Lucas was the one who'd worked on Gimme Shelter. I assumed Scorsese because he'd worked on Woodstock, but ya learn something new every day! A fun quiz.
I only got Columbine right for the same reason that Brian expressed, remembering being a bit taken aback by its status as #1 on that poll. Not that I don't admire the hell out of the movie, but as a strict doc, there are many others that are more "perfect"...
C
Posted by: Craig P at May 7, 2004 12:20 PM






Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email