September 10, 2003
Shorts, 9/10.
"Why would one attempt to cinematically recreate literary incoherence?" asks Ashley Allinson in his contribution to the Senses of Cinema "Great Directors" series. His subject is David Cronenberg, his question pointed at the case of Naked Lunch and the one possible answer he puts forward isn't particularly encouraging to those looking forward to the recently announced Criterion release on DVD: "One conclusion that can be drawn is that Cronenberg adapted a screenplay from the Burroughs mystique, not directly from his text, as many argue, a snuff pastiche enveloped within Cronenberg's 13 years of adaptation."
More from David Thompson:
David Cronenberg has described his "adaptation" of Burroughs' book as if he and the author had ventured into The Fly's telepod together and produced an unexpected hybrid. This is not any kind of direct transposition of an intangible and hallucinatory text, but a film on the act of writing itself, with fictional narcotics as a guiding factor and the biography of Burroughs as an anecdotal reference point... If its virtues lie in its vices, then the dangerous liason between Cronenberg's vices and Burroughs' was simply too much for any one feature film to contain.
Frankly, that's just the sort of review that has me anticipating the "unexpected hybrid" all the more.
More news via the DVD Talk newsletter: Francis Ford Coppola seems to be something of a Guest Star on the DVD that comes along with the latest issue of McSweeney's, described at Powell's as "[a]n instant classic of the DVDs-attached-to-literary-quarterlies genre." DVD Talk describes Coppola's "Director's Audio Commentary": "The result is HILARIOUS as Coppola comments on footage he's never seen with long tangential tales spawning off some of the most mundane aspects of the segment."
Also at DVD Talk: An interview with Neil Gaiman. And also at McSweeney's: Richie Chevat's "The Screenwriter's Vacation."
Back to Coppola for a moment and another DVD on the way. Yes, it's One From the Heart, the movie Coppola feels was "assassinated" before it ever had a chance. He tells the Toronto Star's Geoff Pevere why. Meanwhile, Armond White who, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse, never reads a film quite like anyone else, has this to say about Lost in Translation:
Although I defend Sofia Coppola's performance as Mary, the cosseted Italian-American princess in the criminally undervalued The Godfather, Part III, her recent turns at film directing suggest that she wasn't really acting. It's hard to think of other filmmakers who tried this hard to make a virtue of privileged-girl petulance or other films by women that so evidently bought into patriarchy and the male point of view.... My interpretation is not necessarily what Coppola intended... It's poignant proof of complex father-daughter dynamics that Sofia Coppola translates her personal family tension into Lost in Translation's very chaste girl-to-father-figure rapprochement.
Good Lord. After hiding out in Japan for eons (that's eons measured in blog time, of course), Roger Avary is suddenly posting up a storm. Five entries in as many days? And what entries.
Festival round-up? Let's go:
Two non-Toronto related interviews: Iranian director Jafar Panahi in the Independent and Ewan McGregor in the Observer on, among many other things, Young Adam (see also our recent chat with Tilda Swinton).
Intriguing news via Fimoculous: "Don DeLillo's White Noise has been adapted for the screen," reports Amy's Robot in an entry spiced up with other DeLillo-on-film tidbits.
In the run-up to 9/11/03, Danny Schechter lifts the hood off DC 9/11: Time of Crisis and peers deep inside for Alternet: "Laugh if you will - as are many of those familiar with all the deceptions and contradictions in the President's post 9/11 responses - but don't underestimate how a well-produced story technique can shape and 'embed' a pro-Bush narrative in our brains." Also: Ric Burns takes New York Times readers' questions concerning the WTC.
Also in the NYT, "A Star's Real Life Upstages His Films" is an appropriate headline over a piece on Tab Hunter; the news hook: With the help of Eddie Muller, he plans to have a book out in two years.
Along with its fall preview, the Village Voice this week runs a mad, mad interview with Guy Maddin, conducted by himself.
Online viewing tips. First, Four Minutes with Frank Chu. Second, Fensler Films, via SignalStation. Third, a trailer for the 10th Anniversary DVD Ninja Scroll DVD, via lots and lots of places.
Frank Chu was on the corner of New Montgomery & Market this morning. I noticed he has a newly printed sign. No single letter-sticker overlays on it yet. And the sponsor on the back of the sign has changed to some cafe that claims to have the "best crepes in all the 12 galaxies."
I'm glad we have Frank Chu around as it's always fun to spot him, but the fun wears off the closer you look. You notice his limp and wonder what drives him to walk his San Francisco route every day. His voice is low and hoarse. And anyone caught in a conversation with him, hoping for a few funny conspiracy theories, finds out that once he gets started, he won't stop.
And the more obvious his mental illness becomes, the more the kitsch wears thin. Still... it usually brightens my day to see him parading down the street, tourists' eyes widening as he stomps past them, heads turning to watch him disappear.
Posted by: M. Signalstation at September 10, 2003 9:21 AMI'm so excited at hearing about the release on DVD of Cronenberg's Naked Lunch I can hardly contain my urge to snort some bug powder.
Posted by: GEvans at September 10, 2003 10:40 AMIt took me several reads to parse the phrase, "has been tough-guy actor Danny Aiello."
Interestingly, Josh& co at Cyan began blogging from the set of ILYW, but with all the publicists and talent in the kitchen, they ran into political problems and suspended it for a while. Glad to see it hasn't slowed them down, though. Their own site's enlightening enough.
Posted by: greg.org at September 10, 2003 12:07 PMM, I definitely hear you. Some time back, Andrew Sullivan, one of GC's managing partners sent along this story in the SF Chron. Part of the problem, too, goes back to the Reagan era when institutions for those with mental illnesses were shut down and the patients chased out onto the streets - a catastrophic mistake that's never been corrected, even throughout the 8 years of the Clinton administration.
Seems odd to segue from that to Naked Lunch, but yes, GEvans, I'm looking forward to the release and all its extras as well. It's been too many years since I've seen the film - and that was on VHS.
Greg, I was going to point to the ILYW site but saw that it was pretty much on hold. Regardless, wouldn't it be enlightening if more companies were that open and generous.
Posted by: David Hudson at September 10, 2003 1:08 PMFrom some of the stories the Cyan guys have told me, it'll be a while before celebrity publicists will allow blog-level coverage.
They all fought to declare their talent off limits for blogging, literally leaving the hired bloggerwoman to cover the grips and the craft services truck guy.
Similarly, I've had a publicist at a party I threw come up after I chatted up some celeb guest tell me they have to give "double approval" of any posts or photos on my weblog. hi-larious.
Posted by: greg.org at September 11, 2003 7:24 AMIt is. And yet why am I not surprised. There's more coverage of celebs than ever (remember when a single interview with De Niro was all but unthinkable? And now...), but less and less of any interest precisely because handlers have raised the walls so high. But of course, I'm pounding away at a dead horse.
You saw a way of getting around that with Sofia Coppola: don't act like a reporter. Show ads on your laptop. Come up with something fresh, and then, do more than transcribe; set the scene.
But back to the subject at hand. Remember when the Baghdad blogger was anonymous? Someone within the industry could pull off something pretty interesting if it weren't mere gossip and if it were meaty enough and believable enough to be trustworthy.
That'd be a lousy thing to do, though, wouldn't it. How could I even think of such a thing.
[g]
Posted by: David Hudson at September 11, 2003 1:29 PMPatricia Highsmith published a grim story in her 1987 collection TALES OF NATURAL AND UNNATURAL CATASTROPHES about turning the mildly insane out onto the streets (entitled SWEET FREEDOM! AND A PICNIC ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN). The context is fiction but it reads rather prescient here in San Francisco.
Posted by: Jonathan Marlow at September 11, 2003 2:55 PMIn regards to dwhudson's September 10th 2003 commentary on David Cronenberg's "Naked Lunch". i was writing with the hopes that the crtierion release of "Naked Lunch" would not simply be vanilla, but would finally have a director's commentary for his adaptation. I think, and my colleagues agree, that without this commentary, the commentary of the academic is as interpretive as the adaptation itself. "Naked lunch", on DVD should work to clarify alot of the arguements pertaining the film that are coming out of academic ingroups.
Posted by: ashley allinson at April 1, 2004 8:07 AM







Subscribe to GreenCine Daily by email