August 1, 2003

Dog Days and Blurb Whores.

Welcome to August, a month where heat makes you do crazy things. This hasn't been a very wet or hot summer but it's definitely been American. Just a few little bits o' news and commentary today before I sign off for the week. David Hudson, if he survived his family vacation, will be back full-time next week.

Just a couple of things, then, before I sign off...

1.) Ewan MacGregor, in an interview in the Independent UK, declares his role in the upcoming in an interview in Young Adam is "possibly the most introverted and complicated part that I have ever played." He also sounds pretty tired of Star Wars (aren't we all?) and launches some shots at the British financiers who held up Young Adam. But the best part is sex, talking about his purportedly rowdy sex scene with Emily Mortimer, that is.

2) "Gigli" is making people giggle, unintentionally. Looks like the first true bomb of the Summer (which is impressive), a Glitter of '03. In the LA Times, Manhola Dargis calls it "nearly as unwatchable as it is unpronounceable" and that it would stink even without the two stars. Amusing, too, is the SF Weekly: "The best that can be said about it here is that it doesn't beat out The Ladies Man as the most abrasively awful film of the past five years, though whoever chose to greenlight a film about a mobster baby-sitting a retarded youngster who helps him to 'convert' a lesbian really should be fired." So, it's not good, is what you're saying?

3) Speaking of critics n' blurbs, this is nothing new but I've been thinking even more than usual lately about those people who for lack of a better term can rightly be called "blurb whores" -- pseudo-critics whose names and effusive quotes can be seen on every movie advertised on TV and in the papers. No matter how terrible the film obviously is, there they are, the Pat Collins and Jeff Craigs (does anyone actually listen to "Sixty Second Preview") and the Joe Schlabotnick of Spring Break Newsletter or whatever. People who make Gene Shalit look like Pauline Kael.
Anyway, here's an amusing summary of how the term "blurb whore" started.

And then I thought I'd open up a discussion -- what is the most ridiculous blurb-whore-blurb you've seen in recent times? I also like ads that take blurbs from reviews where the critic obviously didn't even like the film. "Interesting..." -- NY Times. (From a longer review, "The premise was interesting for about twenty minutes but then the whole film fell apart.") Here's a real one: "Completely over the top" -- aintitcoolnews.com, for Boat Trip. (Btw, is Cuba Gooding slumming or what?)

You can tell a blurb whore by how cutesey-catchy they try to be, summarizing their thoughts in dumbed-down sound bites. A good new example is: "This final sequel is icing on the wedding cake! You will love, honor and cherish 'American Wedding.'" --Amber Benson, WB-TV. Hey Amber, were you in my Russian Cinema film theory and criticism class at SF State?

Actually, since the arrival of Richard "I Like Everything" Roeper, "Two thumbs up!" sounds even more ludicrous.

So pick (on) your favorite blurb whore quote.

4) Courtesy AICN: The trailer for the new Woody Allen movie doesn't even feature Woody Allen, Sigourney, or any of the more adult stars of the film -- it focuses on Jason Biggs (from American Wedding to Woody) and Christina Ricci. Check it out.

5) Lastly, some other cool news: GreenCine's throwing its first ever Film Trivia Night, on August 7th in San Francisco. Sort of a celebration of our 1st anniversary, sort of an excuse for a party, sort of an excuse to give away some gifts, etc. It's at the Orbit Room, Market at Laguna, 7PMish. Here's the Craigslist announcement. Another one will appear on the GC site soon. I've been roped into hosting. Eek.



Bookmark and Share

Posted by cphillips at August 1, 2003 3:35 PM
Comments

*A good new example is: "This final sequel is icing on the wedding cake! You will love, honor and cherish 'American Wedding.'" --Amber Benson, WB-TV. Hey Amber, were you in my Russian Cinema film theory and criticism class at SF State?*

Is this a real blurb, not something you made up? Amber Benson is the actress who played Tara, Willow's lesbian lover in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer TV series. Willow, of course, was played by Alyson Hanigan, who as I understand it is the love interest in all the American pie movies. This must be some kind of weird in joke.

It's all over my head...

Posted by: Sara at August 2, 2003 7:44 AM

Oh man, I never made the connection! Yes, I wish I was clever enough to have made that up, but no, that was a real quote from her. How silly of me to have missed that. Yes, I think we can rule out a "critical impartiality" there, eh?

Hanigan, if you ask me, has always been the best thing in the American Pie movies. Certainly had the best line in the first one, which is the only halfway decent one of the "Pie Trilogy".

Anyway, thanks for pointing that out. I wonder how many other "critics" are along these lines.

Btw, since when did Larry King become a "film critic."

quotation-happy,
C

Posted by: Craig P at August 2, 2003 10:21 AM

my faves usually come from art movies, where the quote doesn't even end up saying, "it's good"...

director antonio serrano is a commanding filmmaker. - okay, so i don't want to be his waiter?

A KALEIDOSCOPIC GRUNGEFEST! - an eclectic bandana! three narcotic struts! well okay this has enthusiasm but doesn't this just scream "warning: i was stoned when i saw it"?

thrillingly cinematic. - "and by that i mean to devote the rest of my review to explaining what 'cinematic' means to me and only me."

i guess i feel like blurb whores can exist because other critics get a little loose with their lovin'.

Posted by: "chirp" at August 2, 2003 11:18 AM

Heh!

Yeah, there are those blurbs which sound like the author was tripping on acid when they wrote it.

It's true, there are more "legitimate critics" who fall into blurb-whore-dom, too. But then, perhaps there are very few legit critics these days. They've all been influenced by each other, feasting off the marketing-induced haze that dictates a large percentage of the releasing schedule these days.

I cracked up yesterday because I was reading the SF Chronicle's (sigh) sunday Movie pullout section (ugh) which features a new column by their lead critic, the pseudonymous Mick LaSalle. And in yesterday's "Ask the Critic" he answered the rather stupid question, "Why do your reviews seem to differ so much from other critics' consensus?" with (essentially) "Because most critics these days aren't legit critics at all." Hah. He's right in a way, of course, but then again, he's... Mick LaSalle!

Posted by: Craig P at August 4, 2003 10:45 AM

i respect mick's reviews. i figure if he really liked something, it's going to be engaging, and if he didn't, it's a lead weight. in between there i don't know what the hell he's talking about usually. but i think he tries to lay his thinking out for everybody and that's very professional, i like that.

Posted by: "chirp" at August 4, 2003 4:39 PM

WHAT IS THIS WEB SITE THAT I'VE STUMBLED ONTO?

Posted by: mick lasalle at September 6, 2003 1:05 PM